Re: Alembic sticky memory properties

2016-12-13 Thread Morten Bartholdy
I ended up deleting it, so I could control it directly with overrrides - thanks 
for the tip :)

Morten



> Den 8. december 2016 klokken 20:14 skrev Steven Caron :
> 
> 
> Yes, its useful for animating visibility of an object. But it can confuse
> Softimage a bit when switching passes or overrides. Sometimes it just needs
> a refresh. ie. toggle the partition visibility. Of course if you don't need
> it, delete it.
> 
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Morten Bartholdy 
> wrote:
> 
> > Didn't know there could be alembic visibility ops but that was the culprit
> > it seems - thanks!
> >
> > Cheers
> > Morten
> >
> >
> --
> Softimage Mailing List.
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
> "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.


Re: Alembic sticky memory properties

2016-12-08 Thread Steven Caron
Yes, its useful for animating visibility of an object. But it can confuse
Softimage a bit when switching passes or overrides. Sometimes it just needs
a refresh. ie. toggle the partition visibility. Of course if you don't need
it, delete it.

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Morten Bartholdy 
wrote:

> Didn't know there could be alembic visibility ops but that was the culprit
> it seems - thanks!
>
> Cheers
> Morten
>
>
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.

Re: Alembic sticky memory properties

2016-12-07 Thread Morten Bartholdy
Didn't know there could be alembic visibility ops but that was the culprit it 
seems - thanks!

Cheers
Morten


> Den 1. december 2016 klokken 18:57 skrev Steven Caron :
> 
> 
> Are there alembic_visibility operators on the Visibility property?
> 
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Morten Bartholdy 
> wrote:
> 
> > I am setting up some passes with imported alembic geometry and experience
> > while overriding visibility and switching passes that if an alembic file
> > had a raytype or visibility overridden to off in the previous pass, it
> > stays that way in the alembics own visibility property even if the override
> > is no longer present.
> >
> > Have anyone here run into something like this, and is there a particular
> > workflow or way to fix this?
> >
> > Currently I have resorted to adding overrides to ensure visibility is on
> > where needed, but it doubles the override workload which kind of sucks.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Morten
> > --
> > Softimage Mailing List.
> > To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com
> > with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
> >
> --
> Softimage Mailing List.
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
> "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.


Re: Alembic sticky memory properties

2016-12-02 Thread Pierre Schiller
Are you working on si2015 sp2?
or Si 2014 sp2? maybe it's a shader thing. Does the log says something?
verbose at command prompt maybe?

On Dec 2, 2016 11:45 AM, "Morten Bartholdy"  wrote:

> Not at the office today so I will take a look on Monday. I have not used
> alembic a lot so I am still finding my way around it.
>
> MB
>
>
>
> > Den 1. december 2016 klokken 18:57 skrev Steven Caron  >:
> >
> >
> > Are there alembic_visibility operators on the Visibility property?
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Morten Bartholdy 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I am setting up some passes with imported alembic geometry and
> experience
> > > while overriding visibility and switching passes that if an alembic
> file
> > > had a raytype or visibility overridden to off in the previous pass, it
> > > stays that way in the alembics own visibility property even if the
> override
> > > is no longer present.
> > >
> > > Have anyone here run into something like this, and is there a
> particular
> > > workflow or way to fix this?
> > >
> > > Currently I have resorted to adding overrides to ensure visibility is
> on
> > > where needed, but it doubles the override workload which kind of sucks.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Morten
> > > --
> > > Softimage Mailing List.
> > > To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com
> > > with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
> > >
> > --
> > Softimage Mailing List.
> > To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com
> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
> --
> Softimage Mailing List.
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com
> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
>
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.

Re: Alembic sticky memory properties

2016-12-02 Thread Morten Bartholdy
Not at the office today so I will take a look on Monday. I have not used 
alembic a lot so I am still finding my way around it.

MB



> Den 1. december 2016 klokken 18:57 skrev Steven Caron :
> 
> 
> Are there alembic_visibility operators on the Visibility property?
> 
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Morten Bartholdy 
> wrote:
> 
> > I am setting up some passes with imported alembic geometry and experience
> > while overriding visibility and switching passes that if an alembic file
> > had a raytype or visibility overridden to off in the previous pass, it
> > stays that way in the alembics own visibility property even if the override
> > is no longer present.
> >
> > Have anyone here run into something like this, and is there a particular
> > workflow or way to fix this?
> >
> > Currently I have resorted to adding overrides to ensure visibility is on
> > where needed, but it doubles the override workload which kind of sucks.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Morten
> > --
> > Softimage Mailing List.
> > To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com
> > with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
> >
> --
> Softimage Mailing List.
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
> "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.


Re: Alembic sticky memory properties

2016-12-01 Thread Steven Caron
Are there alembic_visibility operators on the Visibility property?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Morten Bartholdy 
wrote:

> I am setting up some passes with imported alembic geometry and experience
> while overriding visibility and switching passes that if an alembic file
> had a raytype or visibility overridden to off in the previous pass, it
> stays that way in the alembics own visibility property even if the override
> is no longer present.
>
> Have anyone here run into something like this, and is there a particular
> workflow or way to fix this?
>
> Currently I have resorted to adding overrides to ensure visibility is on
> where needed, but it doubles the override workload which kind of sucks.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Morten
> --
> Softimage Mailing List.
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com
> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
>
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.

Alembic sticky memory properties

2016-12-01 Thread Morten Bartholdy
I am setting up some passes with imported alembic geometry and experience while 
overriding visibility and switching passes that if an alembic file had a 
raytype or visibility overridden to off in the previous pass, it stays that way 
in the alembics own visibility property even if the override is no longer 
present.

Have anyone here run into something like this, and is there a particular 
workflow or way to fix this?

Currently I have resorted to adding overrides to ensure visibility is on where 
needed, but it doubles the override workload which kind of sucks.

Thanks.

Morten
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with 
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.