Hi Alain all,
I support to adopt this a WG item. I believe 3GPP is also expecting to
see it progress.
Regards,
--
Hidetoshi
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest in GI
DS-lite, and
the recommendation was the IETF should take on its standardization.
There was
On May 7, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
(c) N:1
model: a single CGN serve a group of PGW/GGSN. Indeed, having +16M of
customers
is a valid case. **BUT** which Service Provider will accept to service this
huge
amount of UEs with the same node (if we suppose that a mega
Hi Fred,
Le 6 mai 2010 à 16:52, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Not sure whether any changes are necessary,
AKAIKT, ll changes that were agreed in Anaheim are now in the document, so that
it can proceed.
but in terms
of MTU the tunnel should try for more than 1280 if possible.
Right.
And this
Hi Remi,
-Original Message-
From: Rémi Després [mailto:remi.desp...@free.fr]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 9:20 AM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Mark Townsley; softwires
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action:draft-ietf-softwire-ipv6-6rd-09.txt
Hi Fred,
Le 6 mai 2010 à 16:52, Templin,
I support to adopt this as a WG item. This is also required for the IPv6
migration work currently underway in 3GPP.
Thanks,
Parviz
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
Le 7 mai 2010 à 18:51, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Remi,
-Original Message-
From: Rémi Després [mailto:remi.desp...@free.fr]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 9:20 AM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Mark Townsley; softwires
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D
Remi,
-Original Message-
From: Rémi Després [mailto:remi.desp...@free.fr]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 1:12 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Softwires
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action:draft-ietf-softwire-ipv6-6rd-09.txt
Le 7 mai 2010 à 18:51, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Remi,
(c) N:1
model: a single CGN serve a group of PGW/GGSN. Indeed,
having +16M of customers
is a valid case. **BUT** which Service
Provider will accept to service this huge
amount of UEs with the
same node (if we suppose that a mega centralised CGN
implementation
is found in the
