Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?

2010-05-12 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Dear Sri, Thank you for answers. Please see inline. Cheers, Med -Message d'origine- De : Sri Gundavelli [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] Envoyé : mardi 11 mai 2010 23:31 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP; Cameron Byrne Cc : softwires@ietf.org; BINET David NCPI/NAD/TIP Objet : Re:

Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?

2010-05-12 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Mohamed, Please see inline. Med: Since the request come from 3GPP, the applicability of the solution SHOULD NOT be beyond that scope. Furthermore, the draft should at least provide a background on the main recommendations of 3GPP SI: DS and IPv6-only and that the proposal can be used

Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?

2010-05-12 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Re-, Please see inline. Cheers; Med -Message d'origine- De : Sri Gundavelli [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] Envoyé : mercredi 12 mai 2010 09:12 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP Cc : softwires@ietf.org Objet : Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? Hi Mohamed, Please see

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action:draft-despres-softwire-sam-00.txt

2010-05-12 Thread Ruri Hiromi
Hello, Let me confirm about 2 description. 1) Section 2.5, Fragmentation Considerations For If the exterior locator family of a SAM domain is IPv4 case, you mentioned as having the Don't Fragment bit set to 1 may either be discarded (with appropriate ICMPv6 error message returned to the