Re: [Softwires] Closing draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation

2012-02-13 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Dear Cameron, Yes, I know it is tempting to have such section but it won't help in making a decision and, furthermore, it may maintain a tension between stateless and stateful camps. We tried in the document to be neutral as much as possible and avoid claiming stateless is superior to stateful

Re: [Softwires] Closing draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation

2012-02-13 Thread liu dapeng
2012/2/13, Ole Trøan otr...@employees.org: Cameron, RFC1958 gives the fundamental principles. search for state. Yes. But do you think it is achievable for pure stateless? BR, Dapeng cheers, Ole On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:02 , Cameron Byrne wrote: On Feb 12, 2012 7:14 PM, Satoru Matsushima

[Softwires] RFC 6519 on RADIUS Extensions for Dual-Stack Lite

2012-02-13 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6519 Title: RADIUS Extensions for Dual-Stack Lite Author: R. Maglione, A. Durand Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2012