Re: [Softwires] Result from the consensus call on Map vs 4rd-U and official way forward

2012-05-03 Thread Jacni Qin
Ole, On Thursday, May 03, 2012 2:58:35 PM, Ole Trøan wrote: Jacni, My concern is MAP isn't a single solution. Operators still need to make a choice between E and T because they are not compatible. would it alleviate your concerns if the documents had MUSTs for both? i.e. increasing the

Re: [Softwires] Result from the consensus call on Map vs 4rd-U and official way forward

2012-05-03 Thread Rémi Després
2012-05-03 à 10:38, Ole Trøan: ... let us accept that the requirements for translation and the requirements for encapsulation are mutually exclusive. Agreed: each of E or T doesn't cover by itself all expressed requirements for a stateless 4via6 solution. The question that remains, however,

[Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02.txt

2012-05-03 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. Title : Multicast Extensions to DS-Lite Technique in Broadband Deployments Author(s) : Jacni Qin

Re: [Softwires] Result from the consensus call on Map vs 4rd-U and official way forward

2012-05-03 Thread Jacni Qin
Ole, On 5/3/2012 Thursday 4:38 PM, Ole Trøan wrote: Jacni, My concern is MAP isn't a single solution. Operators still need to make a choice between E and T because they are not compatible. would it alleviate your concerns if the documents had MUSTs for both? i.e. increasing the probability