Ole,
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 2:58:35 PM, Ole Trøan wrote:
Jacni,
My concern is MAP isn't a single solution. Operators still need to make a
choice between E and T because they are not compatible.
would it alleviate your concerns if the documents had MUSTs for both? i.e.
increasing the probability that an implementation supported both, and making
this purely into an operational choice?
I'd rather prefer you pick one only.
Fully agree, and IMHO, there have been lots of compromise in the design of MAP
algorithm to accommodate both E and T.
examples?
Section 5.4, the BR address,
And the 6 about the design of IID, I'm not a fan of the statement like
"The encoding of the full IPv4 address into the interface identifier,
both for the source and destination IPv6 addresses have been shown to
be useful for troubleshooting. "
...
Cheers,
Jacni
cheers,
Ole
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
