Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

they are originally designed. MAP is not supposed to do the 1:1 mode in the beginning. Regards! Jiang Dong From: Satoru Matsushima Date: 2012-06-27 12:37 To: Peng Wu CC: softwires; ian.farrer Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOTreflect the consensus from the WG

be discussed, but this is not the right time to do this before a clear clarification is made. Regards! Jiang Dong From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva) Date: 2012-06-27 23:23 To: jiangdong345; Satoru Matsushima; Peng Wu CC: Softwires WG; ian.farrer Subject: RE: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00

Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

of original MAP. Since I cannot find any words in earlier MAP drafts talking about 1:1 mode, what I can imagine is that the two years hard works by the real 1:1 mapping guys are ignored in the new MAP draft. Best Regards! Jiang Dong From: Peng Wu Date: 2012-06-26 12:07 To: Wojciech Dec CC: softwires WG

Re: [Softwires] Comments about 6rd MIB

Hi Shishio, It seems the definition of 6rd MIB is more acceptable than the extension of IP tunnel MIB according to the Softwire meeting in Paris. Since the 6rd MIB draft itself is quite clear, a clarification of using one specific way would be helpful : ) Regards! Jiang Dong 2012-04-18 From

Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rdŠ

Hi Gang, Thanks for your reply. Please see in lines. Regards! Jiang Dong Tsinghua University 2012-03-28 From: GangChen Date: 2012-03-28 00:30 To: jiangdong345 CC: Kevin Y; Softwires WG Subject: Re: [Softwires]Path to move forward with 4rdŠ 2012/3/27, Jiang Dong jiangdong...@gmail.com: Hi Gang

[Softwires] questions about 4rd-u

+) deal with such a packet? Another comment: it would be better to understand the draft if you can put some complete data plan procedures in the example section. Regards! Jiang Dong Tsinghua University___ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org

[Softwires] Comments about 6rd MIB

the conformance part in the definition. 3) I'm not quite sure what's the sixRdIpv4MaskLen used for, can you explain it? Regards! Jiang Dong Tsinghua University___ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Softwires] Fw: New Version Notificationfordraft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite-04.txt

in the address pool? If it is, what's the mean by floor(i / p)? Or maybe I misunderstand the meaning... Best Regards! Jiang Dong Hello Peng, Some comments inline... On 11/3/11 5:12 AM, Peng Wu peng...@foxmail.com wrote: Hi Olivier, see inlines :) -- Peng Wu Hello, thanks

[Softwires] requesting comments about the Softwire mesh MIB

Hi,Softwirers, Since the Softwire Mesh MIB is also on the milestones, I think we need to do something to improve the progress about it. Following is the link about the mesh MIB draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-softwire-mesh-mib-02. This version intrduces the

Re: [Softwires] New working group documents

Hi, I support all of them to become WG drafts. Best Regards! Jiang Dong Hi folks, Following our rough concensus during Quebec City meeting and according to our charter/milestones, the chairs would like to ask the mailing list for the confirmation to adopt the following drafts: 1

Re: [Softwires] Softwire Interim Meeting in Beijing

Dear Chairs, +1, and we also hope to present the softwire mesh MIB Dear Chairs: Are there any plans to discuss the MIBs at the interim meeting? According to our softwire WG milestones, our MIBs also need more discussions. Best Regards Yu -Original Message- From: