Hi, authors of 6rd MIB,
I get some comments about 6rd MIB draft.
1) You mentioned the "tunnelIfXTable" in section 5.2. I think it is a good idea
to extend the tunnel MIB, some scenario cannot be included in RFC4087, such as
point to multi-point tunnel like softwire mesh.
2) It seems you miss the conformance part in the definition.
3) I'm not quite sure what's the "sixRdIpv4MaskLen " used for, can you explain
it?
Regards!
Jiang Dong
Tsinghua University
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
