t the document and re-edited the language
> and grammar.
[if - I’m still seeing some problems with the above two points. I’ll reply you
directly on these]
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mingwei
>
>
>
> 发件人: Ian Farrer
> 发送时间: 2016-04-20 03:53:13
> 收件人: draft
rammar checking throughout.
Answer: We have checked throughout the document and re-edited the language and
grammar.
Best regards,
Mingwei
发件人: Ian Farrer
发送时间: 2016-04-20 03:53:13
收件人: draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast; softwires
抄送:
主题: Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-softwire
is not required.
Cheers,
Med
De : Softwires [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Ian Farrer
Envoyé : mardi 19 avril 2016 21:53
À : draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multic...@ietf.org; softwires@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
Hi,
Here is my
('x' is any valid scope)
==
Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Softwires [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Ian
> Farrer
> Envoyé : jeudi 7 avril 2016 16:59
> À : softwires@ietf.org
> Objet : [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-
Hi, Ian,
Thank you very much! We will modify the draft according to your valuable
comments.
Mingwei
2016-04-20
Mingwei Xu
发件人: Ian Farrer
发送时间: 2016-04-20 03:53:13
收件人: draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast; softwires
抄送:
主题: Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-softwire
Hi,
Here is my review of the draft.
Best regards,
Ian
Pg 5 - states a 'dual-stack' router. The AFBR is not really dual-stack here. It
has two single stack interfaces and implements a transition technology. Suggest
removal of dual-stack.
Section 4.1
The translation between the IPv4 and IPv6
ires" <softwires-boun...@ietf.org>
>
> 2016/04/07 22:58
>
> 收件人
>
> softwires@ietf.org,
>
> 抄送
>
> 主题
>
> [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
>
> Hi,
>
> This document has been around for some time, but has no
Dear All,
I have reviewed the mesh multicast draft. In general, I think that this
document is mature enough to move forward.
Some minor mistakes of the draft:
1. In section 1 1. Introduction, there is no hyperlink for RFC4925;
2. In section 3.2 IPv6-over-IPv4, "IPv6 - to - IPv4 address
Are there any implementations of this?
Ole
> On 07 Apr 2016, at 16:58, Ian Farrer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This document has been around for some time, but has not received any
> substantive reviews. Can I ask for volunteers who are willing to provide
> reviews?
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi,
This document has been around for some time, but has not received any
substantive reviews. Can I ask for volunteers who are willing to provide
reviews?
Thanks,
Ian
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
10 matches
Mail list logo