Le 3 nov. 2011 à 09:50, Jacni Qin a écrit :
if the MAP just covers shared address with one single sharing ratio for
one domain,
the design will be greatly simplified?
Requiring ISPs to maintain IPv4 routing in their networks, just to serve the
few users that need to keep IPv4 prefixes,
Hi Rémi, all,
Since there is only an excerpt of e-mails, I lost the context.
Could you please clarify what is the issue discussed here? Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Rémi Després [mailto:despres.r...@laposte.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 novembre 2011 10:05
À : Jacni
Le 3 nov. 2011 à 10:14, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com a écrit :
Hi Rémi, all,
Since there is only an excerpt of e-mails, I lost the context.
Could you please clarify what is the issue discussed here? Thanks.
Sure.
Right or wrong, I understood that what Jacni
Le 3 nov. 2011 à 10:04, Ole Troan a écrit :
...
Requiring ISPs to maintain IPv4 routing in their networks, just to serve the
few users that need to keep IPv4 prefixes, seems to me a step backward.
can you clarify why this? I don't understand why IPv4 routing has to be
maintained just
2:23 AM
To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Cc: Softwires WG; Ole Troan
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Keeping support of CE IPv4 prefixes in the v4/v6
address mapping?
Le 3 nov. 2011 à 10:14, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com a écrit :
Hi Rémi, all,
Since there is only
hi Remi,
On 11/3/2011 5:04 PM, Rémi Després wrote:
Le 3 nov. 2011 à 09:50, Jacni Qin a écrit :
if the MAP just covers shared address with one single sharing ratio for one
domain,
the design will be greatly simplified?
Requiring ISPs to maintain IPv4 routing in their networks, just to serve
hi,
On 11/3/2011 5:24 PM, Rémi Després wrote:
Le 3 nov. 2011 à 10:04, Ole Troan a écrit :
...
Requiring ISPs to maintain IPv4 routing in their networks, just to serve the
few users that need to keep IPv4 prefixes, seems to me a step backward.
can you clarify why this? I don't understand why
