Joel,
allow me to ask you as an observer some questions:
1. If this WG is not for the WG members, of all cuts sizes, to work in
then what is it for?
2. If the chairs of this WG are unable to steer, form and then actually
measure consensus, and in due course also end up disenfranchising WG
I also believe the additional progress and the expert review on the draft will
make thing better than today. Everyone got the chance to develop himself. So
pls. keep to work on what you love. I meant the result of the last poll (73=2)
have you continue your own story. Right?
Best Regards,
If I may, it seems to me that several of these replies miss some
important points in the message from the chairs.
1) It became clear during the WG poll that the documents were not
complete. This is not a bad thing. We need to finish them.
2) The poll did indicate that there is interest in
the problems here are:
1. a lot of people were hurt by the chairs, IMHO, disparaging
language. wording like inflate generate noise is unfair and impolite.
2. it has been well known that documents were not complete. it was not
needed to make a poll to indicate it. they are not complete != they are
