10 novembre 2017 12:43
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN
Cc : Softwires list;
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-y...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-y...@ietf.org>
Objet : Re: [Softwires] Work Group Last call for
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-07 - Ends 9th Nov
Hi Med,
Model comments:
m1. v
R Mohamed IMT/OLN
> Cc : Softwires list; draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-y...@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [Softwires] Work Group Last call for
> draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-07 - Ends 9th Nov
>
> Hi Med,
>
>
>
> Model comments:
> m1. v6-v4-dscp-preservation -
Group Last call for
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-07 - Ends 9th Nov
Hi Med,
Model comments:
m1. v6-v4-dscp-preservation - deals with whether the DCSP of the incoming
packet will be copied to the header of the outgoing packet or not.
Would this be better implemented as a feature in the model
Hi Med,
>>
>> Model comments:
>> m1. v6-v4-dscp-preservation - deals with whether the DCSP of the incoming
>> packet will be copied to the header of the outgoing packet or not.
>> Would this be better implemented as a feature in the model, as this would
>> allow the use in the mapping entry to
art de Ian
> Farrer
> Envoyé : vendredi 10 novembre 2017 10:16
> À : Softwires list
> Cc : draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-y...@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [Softwires] Work Group Last call for draft-ietf-softwire-
> dslite-yang-07 - Ends 9th Nov
>
> Hi,
>
> Here’s my review of
Hi,
Here’s my review of v07 of the draft.
Cheers,
Ian
Overall comments:
o1. There is a lot of duplication of text between the descriptions given in
Section 2 and the YANG model’s description fields. This makes the document less
readable, and I don’t see it adds anything.
As much of the text
Hi,
The authors believe that draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-07 is now ready for
advancement. This email marks the start of a 2 week work group last call for
the draft.
Please send your comments, either for or against, to the softwire WG mailing
list. The WGLC will end on Nov. 9, 2017.