Hi Satoru-san,
Thank you for your question.
Answer below.
Le 14 sept. 2011 à 05:28, Satoru Matsushima a écrit :
Hi Remi-san, I have one question.
On 2011/09/14, at 2:42, Rémi Després wrote:
Le 13 sept. 2011 à 18:08, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com a écrit :
Hi Rémi,
Thank
Hi Med,
Le 14 sept. 2011 à 07:40, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com a écrit :
...
I didn't get my answer yet. I'm looking for the explanation about the
behaviour of an 6/4 interconnection node receiving IPv4 packets destined to
CPEs assigned with port sets of different sizes. What is the
Remi-san,
On 2011/09/14, at 15:20, Rémi Després wrote:
...
Let's take the example of sec. 6 (A), namely:
+++-+
| Domain IPv4 prefix | Domain IPv6 prefix | AFTR IPv6 subnet (e.g.) |
Med,
On 2011/09/14, at 14:40, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Hi Rémi,
I didn't get my answer yet. I'm looking for the explanation about the
behaviour of an 6/4 interconnection node receiving IPv4 packets destined to
CPEs assigned with port sets of different sizes. What is
Hi Behcet,
This property aims to assess if the proposed algorithms:
1. Preserve the port parity as discussed in Section 4.2.2 of
[RFC4787].
and
2. Preserve port contiguity as discussed in Section 4.2.3 of
[RFC4787] (i.e., RTCP=RTP+1).
An elaboration is also provided in:
