On Mar 17, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Qi Sun wrote:
Hi Med,
I've read through the draft-penno-* and IMHO it is reasonable in the
view of deployment. By configuring the profile (i.e. the per-subscriber
mapping table) in the AFTRs, the SPs can achieve an explicit binding between
the IPv4
Hi folks,
The WG chairs have discussed the agenda based on the presentation requests
and main tasks in our wg. Because we received a lot of requests and only
have limited time for presentation, some of the requests cannot be
scheduled this time.
The agenda has been published at ietf 83 site:
Today, if a user generates a packet using an illegal IPv4 source address,
what would we do? We could drop the packet silently by doing
source-verify. So, tomorrow if a user use illegal port, IMHO AFTR should
drop the packet silently.
On 3/20/12 9:06 AM, Alain Durand adur...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi Yiu,
Sending back an ICMP message when receiving a port out of range should be
configurable IMHO.
When receiving a port out of range, the behaviour of REQ#12 (A, B and C) of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05#section-3 can
be followed by the AFTR.
No need to
On 3/9/2012 9:30 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
+1
I may be against adoption. This DHCPv6 option is needed, but it has
nothing to do with ds-lite, and I'm not sure if this is the appropriate
working group. This option has larger applicability than just
encapsulation. If it is done here, it need to
Dear Chairs,
The authors have asked a slot for
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tsou-softwire-port-set-algorithms-analysis/
before.
It has been referenceed a lot in the heated discussion.
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 20, 2012, at 6:50 AM, Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn wrote:
Hi folks,
Dear Chairs,
I would like to ask a presentation slot for SA46T interoperability test
report again.
I understand the agenda of softwire wg already full, so I ask add this
report to the last of the agenda, and If the agenda finished early,
please give the chance for presentation.
This test
