Dear Stig,
For sure mboned will had the opportunity to review it. No matter where the
document is specified if a piece of work is needed.
This is the kind of cross-WG documents that would require some flexibility form
the IETF to make progress.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De :
Dear Washam,
This is an issue common to all stateless solutions, including deterministic NAT
with (anaycast) IPv4 address pool.
FWIW, we recorded this issue here:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dec-stateless-4v6-04#section-5.15.2.
As a solution to this issue, we proposed to implement the
The Independent Stream Editor has received a request to publish
draft-tsou-softwire-gwinit-6rd-06 as an Independent Submission Informational
RFC. Before the document is published, the IESG needs to determine the
relationship of this document to work in any IETF working groups, as described
in
Hi, Alain, Yong and Ralph,
The newly posted agenda does not match the consensus as you mentioned on
6 Oct 2011, that “multiple address and port mapping technologies could
and should converge” and you formally announced “the creation of the MAP
(Mapping of Addresses and Ports) design team”, a
