Hi all,
This draft is useful for dynamic provisioning of IPv4 addresses and port
sets in lw4o6 scenario.
I support the adoption.
Cheers
Yu
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Yong Cui
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 9:
> As you may know, we are going to close the wg soon.
> So before we close it, we would like to ask the wg to see if you are
> interested in advancing the draft as an Informational doc:
> Dynamic IPv4 Provisioning for Lightweight 4over6
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-softwire-lw4ove
Hi Ole,
2016-12-01 16:59 GMT+08:00 :
> > As you may know, we are going to close the wg soon.
> > So before we close it, we would like to ask the wg to see if you are
> interested in advancing the draft as an Informational doc:
> > Dynamic IPv4 Provisioning for Lightweight 4over6
> > https://datat
At Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:37:21 +0900,
Ian Farrer wrote:
> [if - RFC7227 defines an IPv6 prefix option as being variable length with
> padding to the nearest octet, so yes it would be truncated in your example. I
> will improve the text to clear this point up.
>
> This is an interesting interpreta
