Re: XSS in Solr admin interface

2008-06-20 Thread Nicob
Le jeudi 19 juin 2008 à 19:21 -0700, Mike Klaas a écrit : Fixed in r669766. I checked the patch and it's correctly patching this XSS. Thanks to the dev team ! Regards, Nicob

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-506) Enabling HTTP Cache headers should be configurable on a per-handler basis

2008-06-20 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-506: --- Attachment: SOLR-506.patch With this patch the default behavior is to send cache

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-538) CopyField maxLength property

2008-06-20 Thread Georgios Stamatis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Georgios Stamatis updated SOLR-538: --- Attachment: CopyFieldMaxLength.patch Updated for latest trunk (tested on revision 669140)

Re: Use method chaining in SolrQuery

2008-06-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
+1 On Jun 20, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote: SolrQuery has umpteen no:of setter methods and one needs to invoke a lot of them before sending the query. Can we make the 'setter' methods return 'this' so that users can chain the method calls and make the client code

[jira] Created: (SOLR-602) Method chaining in SolrQuery

2008-06-20 Thread Noble Paul (JIRA)
Method chaining in SolrQuery Key: SOLR-602 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-602 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: clients - java Affects Versions: 1.3

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-602) Method chaining in SolrQuery

2008-06-20 Thread Noble Paul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Noble Paul updated SOLR-602: Attachment: SOLR-602.patch all setter/add methods do a return this Method chaining in SolrQuery

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-572) Spell Checker as a Search Component

2008-06-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606719#action_12606719 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-572: -- Because of the stupid way it gets initialized as

Re: [jira] Updated: (SOLR-502) Add search time out support

2008-06-20 Thread Sean Timm
With the latest patch (Yonik's suggestion to have the flag in the response header) there is no change to the writers, so there is no compatibility issue. -Sean Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote: If the patch is going in immediately it may not be necessary. --Noble On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:37

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-502) Add search time out support

2008-06-20 Thread Sean Timm (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606798#action_12606798 ] Sean Timm commented on SOLR-502: Are you thinking the command pattern would be the preferred

[jira] Created: (SOLR-603) Support Partial Optimizes

2008-06-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
Support Partial Optimizes - Key: SOLR-603 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-603 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Grant Ingersoll Assignee: Grant Ingersoll

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-502) Add search time out support

2008-06-20 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606810#action_12606810 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-502: --- bq. I think that makes sense, but seems to be a big

DirectUpdateHandler vs DUH2

2008-06-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll
What's the point of the DirectUpdateHandler? Why would I ever pick it when I could have the High performance DUH2? More pointedly, if I am adding a feature (SOLR-603) that touches DUH2, and DUH also could implement the feature, do I need to add it to DUH as well? The naming of the DUH2

Re: DirectUpdateHandler vs DUH2

2008-06-20 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the point of the DirectUpdateHandler? Why would I ever pick it when I could have the High performance DUH2? History: at one point in time (a relatively short point in time before even Hoss knew about Solr), DUH

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-603) Support Partial Optimizes

2008-06-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-603: - Attachment: SOLR-603.patch Adds capability to do optimize maxOptimizeSegments=5/ which means that

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-443) POST queries don't declare its charset

2008-06-20 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606886#action_12606886 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-443: --- You're right Lars, setting the URIEncoding didn't work

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-603) Support Partial Optimizes

2008-06-20 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606888#action_12606888 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-603: --- nit: maxOptimizeSegments seems a bit wordy... how

Re: XSS in Solr admin interface

2008-06-20 Thread Mike Klaas
On 19-Jun-08, at 11:17 PM, Nicob wrote: Le jeudi 19 juin 2008 à 19:21 -0700, Mike Klaas a écrit : Fixed in r669766. I checked the patch and it's correctly patching this XSS. Thanks to the dev team ! Thanks for the report! -Mike

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-236) Field collapsing

2008-06-20 Thread JList (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606953#action_12606953 ] JList commented on SOLR-236: Although field collpasing worked fine in my brief testing, when I