Le jeudi 19 juin 2008 à 19:21 -0700, Mike Klaas a écrit :
Fixed in r669766.
I checked the patch and it's correctly patching this XSS.
Thanks to the dev team !
Regards,
Nicob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-506:
---
Attachment: SOLR-506.patch
With this patch the default behavior is to send cache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Georgios Stamatis updated SOLR-538:
---
Attachment: CopyFieldMaxLength.patch
Updated for latest trunk (tested on revision 669140)
+1
On Jun 20, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
SolrQuery has umpteen no:of setter methods and one needs to invoke a
lot of them before sending the query. Can we make the 'setter' methods
return 'this' so that users can chain the method calls and make the
client code
Method chaining in SolrQuery
Key: SOLR-602
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-602
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: clients - java
Affects Versions: 1.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-602:
Attachment: SOLR-602.patch
all setter/add methods do a return this
Method chaining in SolrQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606719#action_12606719
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-572:
--
Because of the stupid way it gets initialized as
With the latest patch (Yonik's suggestion to have the flag in the
response header) there is no change to the writers, so there is no
compatibility issue.
-Sean
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
If the patch is going in immediately it may not be necessary.
--Noble
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:37
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606798#action_12606798
]
Sean Timm commented on SOLR-502:
Are you thinking the command pattern would be the preferred
Support Partial Optimizes
-
Key: SOLR-603
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-603
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606810#action_12606810
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-502:
---
bq. I think that makes sense, but seems to be a big
What's the point of the DirectUpdateHandler? Why would I ever pick it
when I could have the High performance DUH2? More pointedly, if I
am adding a feature (SOLR-603) that touches DUH2, and DUH also could
implement the feature, do I need to add it to DUH as well?
The naming of the DUH2
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point of the DirectUpdateHandler? Why would I ever pick it when
I could have the High performance DUH2?
History: at one point in time (a relatively short point in time before
even Hoss knew about Solr), DUH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-603:
-
Attachment: SOLR-603.patch
Adds capability to do optimize maxOptimizeSegments=5/ which means that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606886#action_12606886
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-443:
---
You're right Lars, setting the URIEncoding didn't work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606888#action_12606888
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-603:
---
nit: maxOptimizeSegments seems a bit wordy... how
On 19-Jun-08, at 11:17 PM, Nicob wrote:
Le jeudi 19 juin 2008 à 19:21 -0700, Mike Klaas a écrit :
Fixed in r669766.
I checked the patch and it's correctly patching this XSS.
Thanks to the dev team !
Thanks for the report!
-Mike
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606953#action_12606953
]
JList commented on SOLR-236:
Although field collpasing worked fine in my brief testing, when I
18 matches
Mail list logo