[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1470:
Attachment: SOLR-1470.patch
# Sets useCompoundFile after setting merge policy
#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1433:
Attachment: SOLR-1433-1.patch
Fixes #1 by changing the excludes attribute from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1433:
Attachment: SOLR-1433-1-2.patch
Fixes 1 and 2.
files included in release that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760190#action_12760190
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1433:
-
Committed revision 819478.
On Sep 27, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: On S-1294, the SolrJS patch, I yet again have concerns about
even including
: this, given the lack of activity (from Matthias, the original
author and
...
: true for others too. At a minimum, I think S-1294 should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760229#action_12760229
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1314:
---
This patch seems to be some binary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760236#action_12760236
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1469:
I just committed the fix for the assertion failure
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Yes, but no committers have stepped up and said whether the patch is any
good.
The last thing I saw about the last actual patch:
this patch should enable the usage of IE8 with solrjs
Tho, I didn't get it working with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760237#action_12760237
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1314:
---
OK, I think I've got the necessary libs, just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760238#action_12760238
]
Stanislaw Osinski commented on SOLR-1314:
-
The required change is right at the end
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-1314.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 819527.
Upgrade Carrot2 to version 3.1.0
Hello,
Anybody knows why we have two sections (indexDefaults and mainIndex) for
configuring Index Writers?
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
We DO have a multi-value field Drug-Name on the paper index.
Unfortunately, we can NOT combine these two distinct indexes into one
BIG index, as you suggested, to fully de-normalize them. A drug has TOO
MANY properties which one can query against and a paper might contain
TOO MANY drugs.
In a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1433:
Attachment: SOLR-1433-3.patch
Fix for 3. I'll commit this shortly.
files included
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760246#action_12760246
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1167:
---
Patch looks fine, just not sure that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760247#action_12760247
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1433:
-
Committed revision 819538.
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/?q=indexDefaults+vs+mainIndex
There's even a JIRA to remove it.
On Sep 28, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Hello,
Anybody knows why we have two sections (indexDefaults and mainIndex)
for
configuring Index Writers?
--
Regards,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/?q=indexDefaults+vs+mainIndex
There's even a JIRA to remove it.
Shall we deprecate it in 1.4 itself? Log a warning if indexDefaults is
present and remove all traces of it from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760254#action_12760254
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1433:
-
Regarding 4, 5 and 6, I believe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-1409.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 819544.
Solr Powered By Logo
So the QParserPlugin can create multiple threads with each one of them
holding a query?
I am not familiar with how Solr uses lucene to do the search.
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:09
Hi guys,
My search result is Gilmore Girls
If I search on Gilmore, it gives me result Gilmore Girls in the output as
desired.
However, if I search on string gilmore* or gilm , it does not work whereas
we want it to work.
Any help highly appreciated.
Thanks!
Hi guys,
My search result is Gilmore Girls
If I search on Gilmore, it gives me result Gilmore Girls in the output as
desired.
However, if I search on string gilmore* or gilm , it does not work whereas
we want it to work.
Any help highly appreciated.
Thanks!
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/?q=indexDefaults+vs+mainIndex
There's even a JIRA to remove it.
Shall we deprecate it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-1300.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I just did a clean package and it seems like these are now taken care of on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760287#action_12760287
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1433:
-
bq. I think the libs were done
Forwarded with permission from Peter Wolanin on a private thread.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peter Wolanin peter.wola...@acquia.com
Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT
To: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4
I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760303#action_12760303
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1433:
---
Seems fine by me as long as it doesn't break
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760305#action_12760305
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1461:
Maybe we can show all memory usage in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760309#action_12760309
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1301:
We need to include the schema.xml in the
StatsComponent
---
Key: SOLR-1471
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1471
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: James Miller
The StatsComponent always returns a missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Miller updated SOLR-1471:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1471.patch
Here is a patch and unit test for single value field that counts missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760325#action_12760325
]
Artem Russakovskii commented on SOLR-1458:
--
Is the fix included in the latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated SOLR-1457:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1457.patch
Updated patch
Deploy shards from HDFS into local cores
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760354#action_12760354
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1458:
bq. Is the fix included in the latest nightly?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1470:
Attachment: SOLR-1470.patch
setUseCompoundFile can only be invoked if the merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar reopened SOLR-1300:
-
I can still see the downloaded libs making their way into the release.
need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1433:
Attachment: SOLR-1433-4-5.patch
Prevents extraction/lib and clustering/lib from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar resolved SOLR-1433.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar (was: Grant Ingersoll)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12760374#action_12760374
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1300:
---
Did you clean everything out?
need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar resolved SOLR-1300.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Sorry, false alarm. I did a clean checkout and yes, these libs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Miller updated SOLR-1471:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.4
Summary: StatsComponent does not calculate number missing for facets
I just discussed this off-line with Matthias. It does not look like
he has the time to give this much attention now. (nor do I)
We agreed that the best steps forward are to:
1. Support the Drupal guys GPL port
2. Archive the solrjs code to solrstuff.org
3. Yank solrjs from apache svn (and 1.4
Yes. We need to make more than one commit in the same second sometimes. It
sounds like we can only hack it to make only one commit in one second.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Au [mailto:bill.w...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 5:09 PM
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sounds very reasonable to me. I hate to see the release of 1.4 being hold
up by Javascript browsers compatibility issues.
Bill
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
I just discussed this off-line with Matthias. It does not look like
he has the time to give
Moving to GPL doesn't seem like a good solution to me, but I don't
know what else to propose. Why don't we just hold it from this
release, but keep it in trunk and encourage the Drupal guys and others
to submit their changes? Perhaps by then Matthias or you or someone
else will have
can we leave it in svn, but drop it from the release? logistically,
what is the best way to do this? Make a branch now, remove it from
/trunk, after release copy it from the branch back into /trunk?
That seems like the best way to kick the can down the road. I agree
an off-the-shelf apache
I'm getting a test error now... is it related to this?
build:
[jar] Building jar: c:\code\solr\dist\apache-solr-velocity-1.4-dev.jar
BUILD FAILED
c:\code\solr\common-build.xml:345: The following error occurred while
executing this line:
c:\code\solr\common-build.xml:216: The following
Dropping it completely from 1.4 seems a little too drastic to me, since the
problem is with IE8 only.
Bill
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
can we leave it in svn, but drop it from the release? logistically,
what is the best way to do this? Make a
I got that earlier tonight too - oddly not on distance, but just on
running test.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Sep 28, 2009, at 9:55 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
wrote:
I'm getting a test error now... is it related to this?
build:
[jar]
I created the /dist directory manually, and ant test worked (minus the clean).
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
I got that earlier tonight too - oddly not on distance, but just on running
test.
- Mark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-1472:
Summary: upgrade maven poms to reference lucene 2.9 artifacts rather than
solr-lucene artifacts
upgrade maven poms to reference lucene 2.9 artifacts rather then solr-lucene
artifacts
--
Key: SOLR-1472
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1472
53 matches
Mail list logo
