init-forrest-entities:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/web
compile-solrj:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solrj
[javac] Compiling 87 source files to /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solrj
Allow query parameters passed to Schema Browser
---
Key: SOLR-1507
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1507
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: web gui
OK, so we are in code freeze right now.
I'm going to follow the Release process at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToRelease
I will put up an RC now, then people can try it out, etc. I would
then like to have a goal of putting up an official set of artifacts to
be voted on next Monday.
+1, let's get that RC out there!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
OK, so we are in code freeze right now.
I'm going to follow the Release process at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToRelease
I will put up an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765076#action_12765076
]
Aytek Ekici commented on SOLR-236:
--
Hi all,
Just applied field-collapse-5.patch and i guess
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
OK, so we are in code freeze right now.
I'm going to follow the Release process at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToRelease
I will put up an RC now, then people can try it out, etc. I would
then like to have a goal of putting up an official set of artifacts to
be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765076#action_12765076
]
Aytek Ekici edited comment on SOLR-236 at 10/13/09 6:46 AM:
Hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765076#action_12765076
]
Aytek Ekici edited comment on SOLR-236 at 10/13/09 6:48 AM:
Hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-1499:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1499.patch
Attached new patch. Reformats code, removing tabs. Adjusts the
Not sure what's up with the failures below - looks like SolrJ got an
error from Solr reporting a failure instantiating a lazy request
handler... but there's no matching exception in the Solr logs.
Running this test by hand worked fine too. I just kicked off another
nightly by hand.
-Yonik
init-forrest-entities:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/web
compile-solrj:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solrj
[javac] Compiling 87 source files to /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solrj
init-forrest-entities:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/web
compile-solrj:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solrj
[javac] Compiling 87 source files to /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solrj
init-forrest-entities:
compile-solrj:
compile:
[javac] Compiling 1 source file to /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solr
[javac] Note:
/tmp/apache-solr-nightly/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/DocSetHitCollector.java
uses or overrides a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with
Ah, of course.
This consistently fails:
ant test -Dversion=nightly -Dtestcase=SolrExampleEmbeddedTest
It's because the version nightly makes the regex not match! We
should probably relax the expressions.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Yonik Seeley
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated SOLR-398:
---
Attachment: fieldable.patch
Patch updated to current trunk. One concrete use case where this
Use field cache when creating response, if available and configured.
Key: SOLR-1508
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1508
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765159#action_12765159
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1508:
We're not going to be updating Lucene as much as we
OK, the nightly now passes latest here:
http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/nightly/
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Ah, of course.
This consistently fails:
ant test -Dversion=nightly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765165#action_12765165
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1499:
One issue, the iteration isn't stopping when it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765166#action_12765166
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1508:
Agreed with Yonik - would like to see this wired
Admin UI display of schema.xml can't find schema file
-
Key: SOLR-1509
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1509
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.4
: fix nightly: be more flexible about solr-cell regex matching jar
...if we're going to change this, we should change it in all the example
solrconfig.xml files to be consistent. But perhaps instead we should
change the nightly build to use a more informative version? like
1.4-dev-nightly ?
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:15:52 -0400
Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
OK, so we are in code freeze right now.
I'm going to follow the Release process at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToRelease
I will put up an RC now, then people can try it out, etc. I
would then like to have a
Thanks... I was just about to go fix nightly version to start with a number.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:59 PM, hoss...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hossman
Date: Tue Oct 13 18:58:59 2009
New Revision: 824882
URL:
: Thanks... I was just about to go fix nightly version to start with a number.
FWIW: I still think that would be a good idea, independent of this feature
(does anyone remember why the nightly build uses -Dversion=nightly
instead of just getting the X.Y-dev version from the build.xml?)
-Hoss
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Thanks... I was just about to go fix nightly version to start with a number.
FWIW: I still think that would be a good idea, independent of this feature
(does anyone remember why the nightly build uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765196#action_12765196
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-236:
Hi Aytek,
How I understand filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765214#action_12765214
]
Tom Hill commented on SOLR-1508:
The key thing I was trying to achieve here was to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-1499:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1499.patch
This patch changes the iterator to throw NoSuchElementException, adjusts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765228#action_12765228
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1508:
IndexReader has getSequentialSubreaders(), and I
http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0-RC/
I have not signed these artifacts yet. I have to generate a stronger
key b/c mine is only 2048. Am working through that now.
This is awesome!
Thanks to all who made this possible.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0-RC/http://people.apache.org/%7Egsingers/solr/1.4.0-RC/
I have not signed these artifacts yet. I have to generate a
This *was* the place where jetty config was described, right?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: This *was* the place where jetty config was described, right?
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty
yes. you can see links to it from SolrInstall, MultipleIndexes, etc...
Some of the glitches that seemed to have resulted from the MoinMOin
upgrade are fucking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765248#action_12765248
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1509:
The only bug here is the confusing error message.
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1509:
---
Description:
When a user attempts to use the ShowFileRequestHandler (ie: /admin/file ) to
access a file
Edits to the SolrJetty page as archived on apache.org:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22update+of+solrjetty%22+site%3Amail-archives.apache.org
Looks like four edits have been made since May 2008:
8/4/2008:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1505.
Resolution: Invalid
There's no bug here ... this is the expected behavior of the standard
QueryParser --
Hi All,
I am trying to install solr nightly build into Eclipse IDE and facing lot of
issues while importing the zip file. The build path, libs and various source
files are scattered. It took me lot of tine to configure and make it run.
What development environment are being used and is there
: Some of the glitches that seemed to have resulted from the MoinMOin
: upgrade are fucking absurd.
I've located what appears to be a backup of the wiki prior to the upgrade,
but the files are only readable by the backup users. I've requested
acess to them so we can try to assess/repair the
: Subject: deploy solr in Eclipse IDE
: In-Reply-To: 4ad4f2c2.8080...@lucidimagination.com
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh
: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0-RC/
I suspect we're going to want to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - particularly
because of LUCENE-1974.
As far as i can tell we don't ever call setAllowDocsOutOfOrder(false) in
Solr so this bug could bite us.
-Hoss
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0-RC/
I suspect we're going to want to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - particularly
because of LUCENE-1974.
I know I was lobbying for not using non-released versions of
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0-RC/
I suspect we're going to want to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - particularly
because
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0-RC/
I suspect we're going to want to wait for Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765392#action_12765392
]
Alex Baranov commented on SOLR-1505:
{quote}In the future: if you see behavior that you
46 matches
Mail list logo
