[jira] Created: (SOLR-1798) Memory leak in FastLUCache

Memory leak in FastLUCache -- Key: SOLR-1798 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1798 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Components: search Affects Versions: 1.4, 1.5 Reporter: Laxman

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1798) Memory leak in FastLUCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Laxman updated SOLR-1798: - Description: Every time a commit happens two Stats instances

Upgrading Lucene jars to 2.9.2 artifacts

Any objections? -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1798) Memory leak in FastLUCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839251#action_12839251 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1798: Thanks Laxman, that does look incorrect. Noble -

Re: Upgrading Lucene jars to 2.9.2 artifacts

On 02/27/2010 05:53 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: Any objections? Didn't rc2 (that we are on) end up being the final release? -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1798) Memory leak in FastLUCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839253#action_12839253 ] Laxman commented on SOLR-1798: -- Thanks for quick reponse Yonik. Following is our analysis so

Re: Upgrading Lucene jars to 2.9.2 artifacts

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/27/2010 05:53 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: Any objections? Didn't rc2 (that we are on) end up being the final release? Hmm, I didn't know that. But the lucene contrib jars checked in trunk are different

Re: Upgrading Lucene jars to 2.9.2 artifacts

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/27/2010 05:53 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: Any objections? Didn't rc2 (that we are on) end up being the final release? Yep - I just updated CHANGES.txt -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com

Re: Upgrading Lucene jars to 2.9.2 artifacts

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: But the lucene contrib jars checked in trunk are different from the ones on Maven. The revision number is same but the date/time of the build is different. For example, the lucene-analyzers-2.9.2.jar: Maven

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1798) Memory leak in FastLRUCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Laxman updated SOLR-1798: - Summary: Memory leak in FastLRUCache (was: Memory leak in FastLUCache) Memory leak in FastLRUCache

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1799) enable matching of CamelCase with camelcase in WordDelimiterFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Darroch updated SOLR-1799: Attachment: SOLR-1799.patch enable matching of CamelCase with camelcase in WordDelimiterFilter

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1775) Replication of 300MB stops indexing for 5 seconds when syncing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839318#action_12839318 ] Bill Bell commented on SOLR-1775: - I agree it is i/o bound. But when we sync using Java

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1568) Implement Spatial Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1568: -- Attachment: SOLR-1568.patch More progress. Don't think it even compiles, but putting it up for

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-64) strict hierarchical facets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839361#action_12839361 ] Jayendra Patil commented on SOLR-64: Facing the Same Issue ... Tried to debug it further