Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1163) Solr Explorer - A generic GWT client for Solr

Option 3 is very flexible, can be configured to any core like QA box or integration box. Pradeep. --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Uri Boness (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: From: Uri Boness (JIRA) j...@apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1163) Solr Explorer - A generic GWT client for Solr To:

Solr nightly build failure

set-fsdir: init-forrest-entities: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/solr/build [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/solr/build/web compile-lucene: [echo] Building analyzers... Trying to override old definition of task m2-deploy Trying to override old definition

Hudson build is back to normal : Solr-trunk #1110

See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1110/changes

[jira] Created: (SOLR-1868) Cutover to flex APIs

Cutover to flex APIs Key: SOLR-1868 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1868 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Michael McCandless Fix For: 3.1 We need to fix Solr to use flex

Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1163) Solr Explorer - A generic GWT client for Solr

Thanks for the feedback. You'll be able to connect to any solr box in all 3 options. In the first option you'll connect to it directly as it will part of the solr runtime (just like the admin pages). In the second option, you'll still be able to configure different cores but at runtime via a

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1163) Solr Explorer - A generic GWT client for Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854494#action_12854494 ] Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1163: I vote for separate .war that can be installed with

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1240) Numerical Range faceting

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gijs Kunze updated SOLR-1240: - Attachment: SOLR-1240.patch Solr 1.4 version of Numerical Range Faceting attached. Works (only) on

Nightly Builds of 1.5?

Hello, I noticed awhile ago that nightly builds stopped at 2/27/10 - that was fine, because that build was working fine for me. However, sometime between late afternoon yesterday and this morning, all nightly builds have disappeared: http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/nightly/ Is this

Re: Nightly Builds of 1.5?

Hmmm, interesting. A few hours ago I deleted them all because they were stale, and put a readme that pointed to the hudson built downloads... but that readme doesn't look like it's being picked up. http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/solr/dist/

Re: Nightly Builds of 1.5?

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Hmmm, interesting.  A few hours ago I deleted them all because they were stale, and put a readme that pointed to the hudson built downloads... but that readme doesn't look like it's being picked up. OK, I changed

[jira] Created: (SOLR-1869) RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour

RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour - Key: SOLR-1869 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1869) RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Calderon updated SOLR-1869: --- Attachment: SOLR-1869.patch RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1163) Solr Explorer - A generic GWT client for Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854648#action_12854648 ] Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1163: -- yeah... I'm leaning toward that option as well. First,

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1163) Solr Explorer - A generic GWT client for Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854658#action_12854658 ] Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1163: - +1 on a separate war file. Solr Explorer is a

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1163) Solr Explorer - A generic GWT client for Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854664#action_12854664 ] Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1163: -- The only downside to this is that it requires extra

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1869) RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854676#action_12854676 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1869: --- Joe, the initialization is the same. I simply prefer

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1869) RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated SOLR-1869: -- Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug) RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-141) Errors/Exceptions should be formated by ResponseWriter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854690#action_12854690 ] Frank Wesemann commented on SOLR-141: - {quote} 1) more smarts in

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1869) RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854700#action_12854700 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-1869: - bq. the RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter seems broken

Re: Making a 'isPartialResults' getter for ResponseBuilder / SolrQueryResponse

Kaktu Chakarabati schrieb: Does anyone else think it might be useful to add a 'isPartialResults()' method to ResponseBuilder / QueryResponse? this can be set e.g in ResponseBuilder.setResult() I'd like to have it on the QueryResponse. -- mit freundlichem Gruß, Frank Wesemann Fotofinder

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1869) RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilter doest have expected behaviour

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854712#action_12854712 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1869: --- bq. The CharArrayMap is more performant in lookup,

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1867) CachedSQLentity processor is using unbounded hashmap

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854729#action_12854729 ] Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1867: - Possibly it is from using ThreadLocal. All

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1870) Binary Update Request (javabin) fails when the field type of a multivalued SolrInputDocument field is a Set (or any type that is identified as an instance of iterable)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasanna Ranganathan updated SOLR-1870: --- Summary: Binary Update Request (javabin) fails when the field type of a multivalued

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-1867) CachedSQLentity processor is using unbounded hashmap

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854729#action_12854729 ] Lance Norskog edited comment on SOLR-1867 at 4/8/10 1:30 AM: -

Re: HTTP Authentication for shards

Distributed Search, down at the bottom, uses SolrJ. This problem should be in SolrJ in the CommonsHttpSolrServer. The Apache Commons HTTP stuff handles authentication: http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/authentication.html You can create the HttpClient and ConnectionManager yourself when using

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1861) HTTP Authentication for sharded queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854775#action_12854775 ] Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1861: - If this was implemented inside SolrJ, then all

Re: Document level security in Apache Solr

For automated testing, a mock implementation of the authentication APIs is usually the approach. The DataImportHandler tests use a mock database and a mock solr index. On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anders- see comments below... Two weeks ago I

Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1801) Delete record by id which is inserted using dedupe processor

If you declare the signature field as stored, all documents can be returned with their generated unique ID. Right? On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Hoss Man (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:    [

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-860) moreLikeThis Debug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854784#action_12854784 ] Lance Norskog edited comment on SOLR-860 at 4/8/10 3:17 AM: +1.