Have you looked at UninvertedField? Not sure if it is what you are after,
but it is essentially multivalued FC.
Yeah, not that much is public in UnInvertedField-
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Feb 18, 2010, at 1:54 PM, patrick o'leary wrote
, but they do support loading via a ValueSource.
Is there something specific you are looking to do?
-Grant
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:12 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
Quick question:
Can poly fields be accessed through fieldCache ?
Quick question:
Can poly fields be accessed through fieldCache ?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12799430#action_12799430
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1698:
---
How does this work with search domains
Hey Brian
The fl issue is something I've seen just this week, I'll dig into it more,
gut feeling is that if it works for the xml writer then it might be
something in the json / python writers and using SolrDocuments vs DocList.
Send me over the patch for defType, I know it's applied on a patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797774#action_12797774
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1680:
---
We've just done something like this recently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796524#action_12796524
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1568:
---
bq. A smart spatial filter, at a minimum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795907#action_12795907
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1602:
---
I've been writing plugin's for solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795932#action_12795932
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1602:
---
1) I agree that Solr needs shorter release
Hmm, so it's faster to do 2 range searches than use the TermEnumerator to
find maybe 4-6 individual CartesianTier id's?
I had similar approaches in the past like 2 years ago, that just weren't
fast enough, and I've even published comparisons with Trie data types, and
find CartesianTier id's
ratio as you change the density and/or distances?
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 8:25 PM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
Hmm, so it's faster to do 2 range searches than use the TermEnumerator to
find maybe 4-6 individual CartesianTier id's?
I had similar approaches in the past like 2 years
, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Chris Male gento...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 8:41 PM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
Afraid I just took a sample set of data that was available to me at my
last
job, and ran the test.
It kind of matched my expectations in terms
gsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 29, 2009, at 3:24 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
I'm also going to include tools to visualize this stuff on a map, that's
been one of the things that's slowed me down a lot in the past, it was
hard
to verify what I was doing
but recent google map contributions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795014#action_12795014
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1568:
---
I would be concerned that this starts making
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795016#action_12795016
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1602:
---
total +1
Makes it a pain to have to use find
Howdy
Couple of things about the ValueSourceParser
#1 Change documentation of
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#ValueSourceParser to say extends
ValueSourceParser rather than implements.
#2 There's an AbstractMethodError when you extend ValueSourceParser and
don't override the
, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:01 AM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
#2 There's an AbstractMethodError when you extend ValueSourceParser and
don't override the init(NamedList args) method
because SolrCore:~439
: 891117
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: koji
Last Changed Rev: 890798
Last Changed Date: 2009-12-15 06:13:59 -0800 (Tue, 15 Dec 2009)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:32 AM, patrick
Rather than subject the list to code, it's pasted here
http://www.pasteyourcode.com/13969
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:58 AM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
SEVERE: java.lang.AbstractMethodError
solrconfig.xml
The parse method only gets called at query time
2009/12/15 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@corp.aol.com
it does not have the code for SocialValueSource..
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:18 PM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
Rather than subject the list to code, it's pasted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789770#action_12789770
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1650:
---
Can we ensure that function queries have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787663#action_12787663
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
You can certainly implement a fuzzy scoring
Got a google alert from a very interesting / confusing page,
http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene/
Anyone know who these guys are?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785369#action_12785369
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1277:
---
b.q. I've been thinking about the idea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785369#action_12785369
]
patrick o'leary edited comment on SOLR-1277 at 12/3/09 3:58 PM
Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:44 AM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
Got a google alert from a very interesting / confusing page,
http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene/
Yep, looks like they have their own spatial
projects.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com
wrote:
What spatial contributions have been contributed from this?
I'm only seeing some query parsing / multi
markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
patrick o'leary wrote:
Someone pulling an Al Gore (inventing the internet) on this isn't my
concern, heck you can just google for some of the class names of
locallucene and see how far spread it is,
Then whats this about:
but it's giving significant
in it, I would not be pushing as hard as I am to
ensure it is added to Solr
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
patrick o'leary wrote:
Think we crossed lines somewhere on the first part of the discussion.
But your doing that yourself at source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785170#action_12785170
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
I will be making some updates that fix a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781143#action_12781143
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
It's important to realize that localsolr is just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781152#action_12781152
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Yeah, this has become a big re-arch of solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781317#action_12781317
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Already added, someone mailed me earlier about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781094#action_12781094
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
11/21/09 21:00 PDT
patrick o'leary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779219#action_12779219
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-1432:
---
Shouldn't ValueSource simply be updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12751994#action_12751994
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
I'm holding off updating localsolr on SF until
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12747477#action_12747477
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Chris / Padraic
I have to disagree -
A patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12723088#action_12723088
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
This is a dash and run comment, as I'm heading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12720866#action_12720866
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
It's in lucene trunk under contrib/spatial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12720995#action_12720995
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
That comes from this patch-
This was an older
, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com
wrote:
Just using the apache-solr example directory, it seems to have gotten
a
bit
big
e.g.
$ du -sh *
13M apache-solr-1.3.0
92M apache-solr-1.4.0
The biggest space user being example-DIH
apache-solr-1.4.0/example
$ du -sh *
4.0KREADME.txt
Just using the apache-solr example directory, it seems to have gotten a bit
big
e.g.
$ du -sh *
13M apache-solr-1.3.0
92M apache-solr-1.4.0
The biggest space user being example-DIH
apache-solr-1.4.0/example
$ du -sh *
4.0KREADME.txt
5.5Mclustering
80K etc
*32M
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708605#action_12708605
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Sorry for not getting into this sooner-
Lets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708679#action_12708679
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Misread positionIncrementGap as precisionStep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708688#action_12708688
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
On 1.2 LocalSolr has suffered from not being
for mergeFactors ?
--
Patrick O'Leary
AOL Local Search Technologies
Phone: + 1 703 265 8763
You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles.
Do you understand this?
And radio operates exactly the same way: you send
Quick question-
What is the purpose of having fetching the fsv when using shards?
when the shard-ed request already sends the fl parameter with the sort
fields
Just thinking it would decouple the need for components to implement
their own fsv code.
--
Patrick O'Leary
AOL Local Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated SOLR-773:
-
Attachment: SOLR-773.patch
This fixes the query parsing issue, it defaults to the use the default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12699346#action_12699346
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
GeoHash can be incorporated to reduce memory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12698496#action_12698496
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Thanks Ryan, I've also updated local / spatial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660384#action_12660384
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Lucene uses a static sort comparator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660389#action_12660389
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
It's because of the FieldSortedHitQueue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated SOLR-773:
-
Attachment: spatial-solr.tar.gz
Port of LocalSolr to spatial-solr for inclusion in solr's contrib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12652158#action_12652158
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-850:
--
When not defined, it defaults to no timeout
Versions: 1.3
Reporter: patrick o'leary
Fix For: 1.3
Include configurable socket timeout and connection timeout settings for
distributed searching.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated SOLR-850:
-
Attachment: SOLR-850.patch
Patches solr-1.3.0 release
Allows for 2 timeout settings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12632239#action_12632239
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Hey guys
Placing both lat and long in the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12632327#action_12632327
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
I believe you guys are using a branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12632358#action_12632358
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-773:
--
Yep agree
Incorporate Local Lucene/Solr
nse (a class of it's own) would
resolve this issue. What do you think about it?
Thanks,
Georgios Stamatis
--
Patrick O'Leary
AOL Local Search Technologies
Phone: + 1 703 265 8763
You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613370#action_12613370
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-565:
--
Been tied up with work recently
The objective
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604276#action_12604276
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-469:
--
With the arow, I noticed by nulling it, that CMS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603662#action_12603662
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-469:
--
There's a slight problem using Connector/J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12598664#action_12598664
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-565:
--
There's one change I was going to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12598495#action_12598495
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-565:
--
That's a different aspect, where you either have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12598071#action_12598071
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-565:
--
I think I see where your going, so if you wanted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12594988#action_12594988
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-565:
--
There are 2 main differences
1) This provides
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated SOLR-565:
-
Attachment: distributor_component.patch
Attaching patch for a DistributorComponent
Provides
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593634#action_12593634
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-502:
--
Has this had any traction in the solr core yet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585702#action_12585702
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-527:
--
I guess there's a couple of questions I'd have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567953#action_12567953
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-303:
--
It looks pretty good, I really need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12565571#action_12565571
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-470:
--
It's a little iffy but what if you just default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12565637#action_12565637
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-470:
--
parseMath returns a Date object that's formated
Reporter: patrick o'leary
A correct iso 8601 date 2006-01-01T12:01:00Z throws an error.
Unparseable date: 2006-01-01T12:01:00Z at
org.apache.solr.schema.DateField.toObject(DateField.java:173) at
org.apache.solr.schema.DateField.toObject(DateField.java:83)
The ThreadLocalDateFormat requires
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561924#action_12561924
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-457:
--
An idea I've been thinking about is to change
Versions: 1.3
Reporter: patrick o'leary
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.3
Provide a multi threaded implementation of CommonsHttpSolrServer
For usage with distributed searching in solr-303
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated SOLR-457:
-
Attachment: multithreaded-solrj.patch
Provides a multi-threaded implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated SOLR-303:
-
Attachment: distributed_pjaol.patch
Hey Yonik
Needed to make a couple of updates to ShardDoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557324#action_12557324
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-303:
--
Small thing but if you update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated SOLR-303:
-
Attachment: distributed_trunk.patch
This might help, merged the distributed federated patchs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557012#action_12557012
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-303:
--
Was missing a file from an svn add, so the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated SOLR-303:
-
Attachment: (was: distributed_trunk.patch)
Distributed Search over HTTP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12556644#action_12556644
]
patrick o'leary commented on SOLR-303:
--
Hey Yonik
Are you applying the federated search
IndexSchema.
see discussion: http://www.nabble.com/QueryParsing.SortSpec-tf4840762.html
--
Patrick O'Leary
You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles.
Do you understand this?
And radio operates exactly
Hey
Is there a reason that QueryParsing.SortSpec has private constructors?
It's preventing me from having a custom sort parser for the
ResponseBuilder
without a patch for solr.
Thanks
P
--
Patrick O'Leary
You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New
is specified.
if we're going to keep it, let's at least put some mutators on it ... and
maybe consider changing the name.
If we change the name, we should also move it to a top-level class
(from a static inner).
Any suggestions?
-Yonik
--
Patrick O'Leary
You see, wire
h shards in parallel threads
-Http connection Keep-Alive ?
-Cache global numDocs and docFreqs
-Cache Query objects in handlers ??
Would appreciate feedback on my approach. I understand that there would be lot things I might have over-looked.
--
Patrick O'Leary
You see, wire tel
87 matches
Mail list logo
