but it seems like things are progressing.
Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1?
If we go
w/
the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for
them.
Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely
removed
so
as to make it a little easier to restore.
-Grant
On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it:
1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2
Yes, ASAP please :-)
2. Commence vote on 1.4.0
3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it:
>
> 1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2
Yes, ASAP please :-)
> 2. Commence vote on 1.4.0
> 3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in Solr and generate final artifacts
If the lucen
t work and haven't been able to
address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing.
Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1?
If we go
w/
the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for
them.
Hopefully, that stuff was just commented o
n able to
address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing.
Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1?
If we go
w/
the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for
them.
Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely
remove
: I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can
: avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest tomcat,
: resin, or other popular servlet containers?
I've done some basic testing on apache-tomcat-6.0.20 -- nothing strenuous,
but basic functionality all seemed to
; On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll >>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are we ready for a release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>&
gination.com
I got busy at work and haven't been able to
address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing.
Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1?
If we go
w/
the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for
them.
Hopefully, t
t;>
>>> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the
>>> version, immediately call a VOTE).
>>>
>>> -Yonik
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>>
>>>> I got busy at work and haven't been able to
>
sion, and there's little point in pushing things off yet
> >> another week.
> >>
> >> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the
> >> version, immediately call a VOTE).
> >>
> >> -Yonik
> >> http://www.luci
27;s little point in pushing things off yet
>> another week.
>>
>> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the
>> version, immediately call a VOTE).
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>> I got busy
there's little point in pushing things off yet
>> another week.
>>
>> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the
>> version, immediately call a VOTE).
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>> I got
Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
I got busy at work and haven't been able to
address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing.
Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If
we go w/
the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them.
Hopefu
eal* one (i.e. no RC label in the
version, immediately call a VOTE).
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
> I got busy at work and haven't been able to
> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing.
>
> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lu
Are we ready for a release? I got busy at work and haven't been able
to address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing.
Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we
go w/ the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for
15 matches
Mail list logo
