Sure. Henri. I'll raise an issue and we can decide as to where to keep it
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Henrib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
I am not much worried about where we store it. CoreContainer just
occurred me as an easy place . The problem we are
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a part of requirement for SOLR-561 . It will be a very nice
feature to have the admin console of the master show details of the
slaves also. To do so The master must know about the slaves. The
slaves
Might be irrelevant but do we have to store this information in the
CoreContainer ?
Couldn't we use core-container (master) core properties (slave) to store
that information ?
These would be filled from the servlet filter (on the master side) in the
core-container properties.
To make them
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Henrib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might be irrelevant but do we have to store this information in the
CoreContainer ?
I am not much worried about where we store it. CoreContainer just
occurred me as an easy place . The problem we are trying to solve is
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
I am not much worried about where we store it. CoreContainer just
occurred me as an easy place . The problem we are trying to solve is
non-availability of this information anywhere .
We are in no functional disagreement and I'm merely trying to point an
