: This was changed on rev 510689. Mostly just wondering what the intent is for
: the tag. Are we planning on getting rid of it?
makes sense as a "property of the schema" ... ie: a
person designing a schema, without any notion of how that schema might be
used, should still be able to convey
On May 8, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
This was changed on rev 510689. Mostly just wondering what the
intent is for the tag. Are we planning on
getting rid of it?
Seems like we should get rid of it. It's query parser specific
whether a default field even makes sense. May
