Except... the only reason (I think) that the Lucene build failed was
because I had switched the back-compat test to check out an https://
URL instead of http:// (the build got hung asking whether you trust
that host because its cert was suspect) so I switched it back...
and I'm not su
+1
I think appropriate selection of defaults, biasing for performance in
this
case, is extremely important yet often overlooked.
The out-of-the-box first-impression experience that people see, with
Solr
or Lucene, often decides whether Solr or Lucene should be considered
for an applicatio
This is LUCENE-1573 (properly responding to Thread.interrupt()), which
is new in 2.9.
Do you know what would have interrupted the thread in your context?
Mike
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> thanks! I'm not sure this is related to 2.9, but I have not seen this
> before
Welcome aboard Mark and Noble!
Mike
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Mark Miller and Noble Paul have accepted
> invitations to become Solr committers!
> Welcome Mark & Noble, and thanks for all your great work on Solr!
>
> -Yonik
>
> ps: followi
Team,
For those Lucene fanatics not in Oakland this week for ApacheCon US,
don't miss the FREE live video streaming, starting today:
http://streaming.linux-magazin.de/en/program-apachecon-us-2009.htm
Note that there are many talks available, covering Apache Hadoop,
Apache HTTPD, Lucene, as wel
Otis, yes, I think so, eventually. But that's gonna take much more discussion.
I don't think this initial cutover should try to "solve" how modules
will be organized, yet... we'll get there, eventually.
Mike
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Check out the dir s
Git, Maven, Hg, etc., all sound great for the future, but let's focus
now on the baby step (how to re-org svn), today, so we can land the
Solr upgrade work now being done on a branch...
Hoss's side-by-side proposal sounds great... and his concrete steps
"that could be done today" look good (I'm ho
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> I think the concern is what happens if Solr migrates a bunch of stuff into
> Lucene, ceding control over crucial functionality, and then Solr wants to
> release but Lucene does not. That would pose a problem for Solr, no?
But, I don't th
Ahh, OK.
Meaning Solr will have to remove deprecated support, which means
Solr's next released version would be a major release? Ie 2.0?
Mike
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>> On versio
All tests pass for me :)
Mike
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Alight, so we have implemented Hoss' suggestion here on the lucene/solr
> merged dev branch at lucene/solr/branches/newtrunk.
>
> Feel free to check it out and give some feedback.
>
> We also roughly have Solr r
Welcome Uwe!!
Mike
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to add Uwe Schindler to
> the PMC. Uwe has been doing a lot of work in Lucene and Solr, including
> several of the last releases in Lucene.
>
> Please join me in e
7 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
>> Cutover to flex APIs
>>
>>
>> Key: SOLR-1868
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1868
>> Project: Solr
>>
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 11/15/06, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any objections to sync'ing solr with lucene trunk? It might be nice
from an impact perspective to do so before lockless commits are
committed.
+1, my thoughts as well.
Hi! Should I hold off on committing lockless until
Manuel Albela Miranda wrote:
Hello everybody,
I wanted to know what can i do to make solr manage the new index format
that comes with last svn version of Lucene, i mean, now there are not a
segments file but segments_1, segments_2 and so on, and a segments.gen
file. I have tried to compile sol
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 11/28/06, Manuel Albela Miranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your answer. Yes, i'm using Sun's JDK 1.5.0 too. Can you tell
me the step you followed to get solr running with the lockless commits?.
I compile the latest java lucene and then put the jar files generate
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Ah, I hadn't realized that they might not be supported everywhere... I
I'm just trusting the javadoc for NativeFSLockFactory ... i have no idea
if it's accurate or not.
Hi! I had added the caveat about native locks based on my dicey
experience getting them working ove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720285#action_12720285
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-1221:
--
+1 ;) Solr's defaults are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12723975#action_12723975
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-940:
-
Shalin I think that exception you go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12724080#action_12724080
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-940:
-
OK I just committed a fix for LUCENE-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12724255#action_12724255
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-940:
-
Sigh. I'll go reopen LU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12724286#action_12724286
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-940:
-
OK try again? Maybe 3rd time's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569525#action_12569525
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-342:
-
Will, did you create a new index in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569845#action_12569845
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-342:
-
Will, one more thing to try is t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12570327#action_12570327
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-342:
-
Super, I'm glad to hear tha
Cutover to flex APIs
Key: SOLR-1868
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1868
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Fix For: 3.1
We need to fix Solr to use flex
25 matches
Mail list logo
