: Now we come to another question: why doesn't X OR -X select the entire
: index?
you really can't mix the AND/OR syntax with the +/- syntax ... AND and OR
just apply options to the clauses on either side... X OR -X is the same
thing as X -X ... debugQuery=true will show you this in the
: A query with highlighting and requireFieldMatch like so:
: .../select?q=%22U2%22hl=truehl.fl=content
: hl.requireFieldMatch=truehl.fragsize=500hl.snippets=5hl.simple.pre=
: %3Cspan%3Ehl.simple.post=%3C/span%3E
:
: does not return highlighting for this document (it is returned as a query
:
I'm developing against solr trunk and I wanted to start using the
newSearcher ans firstSearcher functionality.
However I'm getting a nullpointer exception when I startup my solr
instance .
Stacktrace:
INFO: QuerySenderListener sending requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] main
Mar 21, 2008 4:31:20 PM
Hello Nocolas,
This has been in the back of my mind for a time.
Can you make a patch for it? I'd like to use it.
Thank you,
Koji
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a new property on copy fields that limit the number
of characters that are copied.
The use
To Solr users:
I'm curious: do you store everything in a database and just use Solr
for indexing/searching, or do you store everything in Solr so that
your search results come back with context? Or something in between?
(I know if you want highlighting you have to store those fields.)
At the
We store all needed fields in Solr, but we have only 20 stored fields out of
100+ indexed. Our requirements is to show 20 fields after searching, and when
clients are happy with the result (usually after several searches), we append
all others from DB. Of course it takes a while, because our DB
As always, it depends.
Just from a complexity perspective, my first choice is to store everything
in
one repository.
If I can store everything in Lucene, I'm a happy camper. If I *must* use a
database, I'd prefer to store everything there if possible. I only use both
if I can't avoid it because
Am I correct that if I index with stop words: to, be, or and not
then phrase query to be or not to be will not retrieve any documents?
Is there any documentation that discusses the interaction of stop words
and phrase queries? Thanks.
Phil
: b) the need for a solr home directory and what that is for / what that means
There is some info aboutthis on the general SolrInstall page...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrInstall
which referes to example/solr (where a README.txtfile goes into more
details)
If you (coming from the
Yes. Our in-house example is the movie title The Sound Of Music. Given in
quotes as a phrase this will pull up anystopword Sound anystopword Music.
For example, A Sound With Music. Your example is also a test case of ours.
For some Lucenicious reason six stopwords in a row does not find anything.
We do a similar thing with a no stopword, no stemming field.
There are a surprising number of movie titles that are entirely
stopwords. Being There was the first one I noticed, but
To be and to have wins the prize for being all-stopwords
in two languages.
See my list, here:
unsubscribe
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:01 PM, xunzhang huang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, everyone
After I add a Analyzer to solr, there is a exception ClassCaseException
error and solr cannot be started. the detail is:
environment: solr 1.2, jdk 1.6.03, ubuntu linux 7.10, and a chinese
Hi All:
I have a simple question :
How can we re-use an existing lucene index file (.cfs)
in Solr and search on it in solr?
I need to do this as the index is created on one
machine(client) to be used by solr server for
searching. The solr server will refer to this index
file by some http url. We
13 matches
Mail list logo
