: Thanks for the response, but how would make recency a factor on
: scoring documents with the standard request handler.
: The query (title:iphone OR bodytext:iphone OR title:firmware OR
: bodytext:firmware) AND _val_:ord(dateCreated)^0.1
: seems to do something very similar to just sorting
Hi all,
I used the sample code given below and tried to run with all the relevant
jars. I receive the exception written below.
package test.general;
import org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServer;
import org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException;
import
Hi all,
I used the sample code given below and tried to run with all the relevant
jars. I receive the exception written below.
package test.general;
import org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServer;
import org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException;
import
has anyone experienced this problem?
Can't find an explanation...
Thanks in advance
Marc Sturlese wrote:
Hey there,
1.- I am trying to use date facets but I am facing a trouble. I want to
use the same field to do 2 facet classification. I want to show the count
of the docs of the last
which version of the server are you using? SolrJ documenttaion says
that the binary format works only with Solr1.3
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Sajith Vimukthi saji...@zone24x7.com wrote:
Hi all,
I used the sample code given below and tried to run with all the relevant
jars. I receive
Hi,
I'm using SolrJ to index a couple of documents. I do this in batches of
50 docs to safe some machine memory. I call SolrServer#add(Collection)
for each batch.
For some reason, I get the following exception:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: missing content stream
at
Hi,
I am prototyping lanuage search using solr 1.3 .I have 3 fields in the
schema -id,content and language.
I am indexing 3 pdf files ,the languages are foroyo,chinese and japanese.
I use xpdf to convert the content of pdf to text and push the text to solr
in the content field.
What is the
are you sure the Collection is not empty?
what version are you running?
what do the server logs say when you get this error on the client?
On Dec 18, 2008, at 6:42 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SolrJ to index a couple of documents. I do this in batches
of
50 docs to safe some
Hi,
I am using SolrJ client to connect to the Solr 1.3 server and the whole POC
(doing a feasibility study ) reside in Tomcat web server. If any change I am
making in the synonym.txt file to add the synonym in the file to make it
reflect I have to restart the tomcat server. The synonym
Sagar Khetkade wrote:
Hi,
I am using SolrJ client to connect to the Solr 1.3 server and the whole POC (doing a feasibility study ) reside in Tomcat web server. If any change I am making in the synonym.txt file to add the synonym in the file to make it reflect I have to restart the tomcat
I think I'd pin the user down and have him give me the real-world
use-cases that require this, then see if there's a more reasonable
way to satisfy that use-case. Do they want type-ahead? What
is the user of the system going to see? Because, for instance,
a drop-down of 10,000 terms is totally
Hi everyone,
it seems that I've run into another problem with my Solr setup. :/ The
highlighter just won't highlight anything, no matter which fragmenter or
config params I use.
Here's an example, taken straight out of the example solrconfig.xml:
requestHandler name=dismax
Alright, I pinned it down, I think...
The cause of the error seems to be the features field, which has
termVectors=true, termPositions=true and termOffsets=true. The other 2
fields (name and text) work, they have the same type but lack the
term*-attributes. When you overwrite the default hl.fl
Hello,
I can see from a thread dump that Solr opens a lot of threads.
How does Solr use these threads? Does exist more than one thread for search
in Solr? Does Solr use any type of workManager or are the threads simple
java.lang.Thread ? How many concurrent threads does Solr create? How does it
I think you are facing this problem:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-925
I'm just looking the issue to solve it, I'm not sure that I can fix it
in my time, though...
Koji
Steffen B. wrote:
Hi everyone,
it seems that I've run into another problem with my Solr setup. :/ The
Hi
I have upgraded from solr lucene 1.2 to solr lucene 1.3. I have coppied
all the fieldtype tags in types tag of schema.xml from the
solr 1.2 to solr 1.3 it gives an error..
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid Date in Date Math
String:'2006-Oct-10T10:06:13Z'
can you
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim
alexander.ramos.jar...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see from a thread dump that Solr opens a lot of threads.
How does Solr use these threads? Does exist more than one thread for search
in Solr? Does Solr use any type of workManager or are the
Hi,
One of things we are looking for is to Autofill the keywords when people
start typing. (e.g. Google autofill)
Currently we are using the RangeQuery. I read about the PrefixQuery and feel
that it might be appropriate for this kind of implementation.
Has anyone implemented the autofill
Hi Sujatha.
I've developed a search system for 6 different languages and as it was
implemented on Solr 1.2 all those languages are part of the same index,
using different fields for each so I can have different analyzers for
each one.
Like:
content_chinese
content_english
content_russian
lots of options out there
Rather then doing a slow query like Prefix, i think its best to index
the ngrams so the autocomplete is a fast query.
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg06776.html
On Dec 18, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Kashyap, Raghu wrote:
Hi,
One of
: Subject: looking for multilanguage indexing best practice/hint
: References: 49483388.8030...@drun.net
: 502b8706-828b-4eaa-886d-af0dccf37...@stylesight.com
: 8c0c601f0812170825j766cf005i9546b2604a19f...@mail.gmail.com
: In-Reply-To:
: Subject: Solr and Autocompletion
: References: 49483388.8030...@drun.net
: 502b8706-828b-4eaa-886d-af0dccf37...@stylesight.com
: 8c0c601f0812170825j766cf005i9546b2604a19f...@mail.gmail.com
: 4949537a.3050...@drun.net
:
Good choice!
Mathijs Homminga
Chris Hostetter wrote:
(replies to solr-user please)
On behalf of the Solr Committers, I'm happy to announce that we the
Solr Logo Contest is officially concluded. (Woot!)
And the Winner Is...
Erick,
Thanks for the answer, let me clarify the thing, we would like to have a
combobox with the terms to guide the user in the search i mean, if a have
thousands of documents and want to tell them how many documents in the base
have the particular word, how can i do that?
thanks
On Thu, Dec
Just curious - if we have an approximate target release date for 1.4 /
list of milestones / feature sets for the same.
looks cool :), how about a talking mascot as
Jeryl Cook
twoenc...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Mathijs Homminga
mathijs.hommi...@knowlogy.nl wrote:
Good choice!
Mathijs Homminga
Chris Hostetter wrote:
(replies to solr-user please)
On behalf of the Solr Committers, I'm
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Kay Kay kaykay.uni...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious - if we have an approximate target release date for 1.4 / list
of milestones / feature sets for the same.
Mid January.
Issues included: case-by-case analysis of how ready they are (and
obviously affected by
Thanks Erick,
I think I will go with different language fields as I want to give
different stop words, analyzers etc.
I might also consider scheme per language so scaling is more flexible as
I was already advised but this will really make sense if I have more
than one server I guess, else just all
I'm seeing a weird effect with a '*' field. In the example
schema.xml, there is a commented out sample:
!-- uncomment the following to ignore any fields that don't
already match an existing
field name or dynamic field, rather than reporting them as an error.
alternately,
Looks like it's a bug in the schema browser (i.e. just this display,
no the inner workings of Solr).
Could you open a JIRA issue for this?
-Yonik
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Peter Wolanin peter.wola...@acquia.com wrote:
I'm seeing a weird effect with a '*' field. In the example
It's more related to how much memory you have on your boxes, how
resource intensive your queries are, how many fields you are trying to
facet on, what acceptable response times are, etc.
Anyway... a single box is normally good for between 5M and 50M docs,
but can fall out of that range (both up
How do you get the word in the first place? If the combobox
is for all words in your index, it's probably completely useless
to provide this information because there is too much data to
guide the user at all. I mean a list of 10,000 words with some sort
of document frequency seems to me to
Hello,
I amusing Solr 1.4 (solr-2008-11-19) with Lucene 2.4 dropped in instead of 2.9
I am indexing 500k records using the JDBC Data Import Request Handler.
Config:
Linux openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64)
Dual core dual core 64bit Xeon 3GHz Dell blade 8GB RAM
java version 1.6.0_07
Java(TM) SE Runtime
created issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-929
-Peter
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like it's a bug in the schema browser (i.e. just this display,
no the inner workings of Solr).
Could you open a JIRA issue for this?
-Yonik
hi,
I've successfully added fields to my schema.xml before, and been able to
incrementally keep indexing documents with just the new ones picking up the
fields. This appears to be similar to the case of not including certain
fields in certain documents, as the other documents simply don't have
But i am using CommonsHttpSolrServer for Solr server configuation as it is
accepts the url. So here how can i reload the core.
-Sagar Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:55:02 -0500 From: markrmil...@gmail.com To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Change in config file (synonym.txt)
requires
On Dec 18, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Aleksander M. Stensby wrote:
Hello everyone, I've started to look at TermVectorComponent and I'm
experimenting with the use of the component in a sort of top terms
setting for a given query...
Was also looking at mlt and the interestingTerms, but I would like
On Dec 18, 2008, at 6:25 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
Hi,
I am prototyping lanuage search using solr 1.3 .I have 3 fields in
the
schema -id,content and language.
I am indexing 3 pdf files ,the languages are foroyo,chinese and
japanese.
I use xpdf to convert the content of pdf to text and
DIH does not maintain any state between two runs. So if there is a
perf degradation
it could be because
- Solr Indexing is taking longer after you do a delete *:*
- Your RAM is insufficient (your machine is swapping)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Glen Newton glen.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note that a core reload will also stop Solr from serving any search
requests in the time it reloads.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Sagar Khetkade
sagar.khetk...@hotmail.comwrote:
But i am using CommonsHttpSolrServer for Solr server configuation as it is
accepts the url. So here how
: This bothers me too. I find it really strange that Solr's entry-point
: is a servlet filter instead of a servlet.
it traces back to the need for it to decide when to handle a request and
when to let it pass through (to a later filter, a servlet or a JSP)
this is the only way legacy support
Hi,
I am planning to use Solr's distributed searching for my project. But while
going through http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch, i found a few
limitations with it. Can anyone please explain the 2nd and 3rd points in the
limitations sections on the page. The points are:
-
When
42 matches
Mail list logo
