yeah, finally I did it by modifying the required solrDocumentList and using
it instead of DocList object as in Solr 1.2
Thanks
Pooja
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
you have
Did you add the uniqueKey to schema.xml after indexing? If not, you need to
re-index after changing the schema.
Solr/Lucene do not duplicate documents by itself. How are you indexing
documents to Solr? Did the example setup shipping with Solr work correctly
for you?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:27
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:28 AM, wojtekpia wojte...@hotmail.com wrote:
What happens if I overlap the execution of my cron jobs? Do any of these
scripts detect that another instance is already executing?
No, they don't.
--
View this message in context:
Hi all,
I am using CommonsHttpSolrServer to add documents to Solr. Instead
of explicitly calling commit for every document I have configured
autocommit in solrconfig.xml. But how do we ensure that the document
added is successfully indexed/committed on Solr side. Is there any
callback
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Qingdi qin...@nextbio.com wrote:
Hi,
I use solr 1.3 and I have two questions about spellcheck.
1) if my index docs are like:
doc
str name=NAMEuniversity1/str
str name=TYPEUNIVERSITY/str
/doc
doc
str name=NAMEstreet1, city1/str
str
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Gargate, Siddharth sgarg...@ptc.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am using CommonsHttpSolrServer to add documents to Solr. Instead
of explicitly calling commit for every document I have configured
autocommit in solrconfig.xml. But how do we ensure that the document
Rohit, I'd guess you don't have uniqueKey set to id in schema.xml.
Erik
On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:57 AM, rohit arora wrote:
Hi,
I have add one document only single time but the out put provided by
lucene give me
the same document multiple times..
If i specify rows=2 in out put same
On Jan 9, 2009, at 12:28 AM, smock wrote:
I'm using 1.3 - are the nightly builds stable enough to use in
production?
Testing always recommended, and no official guarantees are made of
course, but trunk is vastly superior to 1.3 in faceting performance.
I'd use trunk (in fact I am) in
Thanks Shalin for the reply.
I am working with the remote Solr server. I am using autocommit instead
of commit method call because I observed significant performance
improvement with autocommit.
Just wanted to make sure that callback functionality is currently not
available in Solr.
Thanks,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Gargate, Siddharth sgarg...@ptc.com wrote:
Thanks Shalin for the reply.
I am working with the remote Solr server. I am using autocommit instead
of commit method call because I observed significant performance
improvement with autocommit.
Just wanted to make
2009/1/8 Otis Gospodnetic otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com
Hello Mark,
As for assigning different weight to fields, have a look at DisMax request
handler -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#head-af452050ee272a1c88e2ff89dc0012049e69e180
Field boosting should solve this issue too,
How do we set the maxDocs or maxTime for commit from the application?
Thanks,
Siddharth
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:34 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ensuring documents indexed by
Sorry, for the previous question. What I meant was whether we can set
the configuration from the code. But what you were suggesting is that I
should call commit only after some time or after few number of
documents, right?
-Original Message-
From: Gargate, Siddharth
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Gargate, Siddharth sgarg...@ptc.com wrote:
But what you were suggesting is that I
should call commit only after some time or after few number of
documents, right?
Correct. If you are using Solrj client for indexing data, you can use the
Shalin,
Just to remember that with he is indexing more documents that he has memory
avaiable, it is a good thing to have autocommit set.
2009/1/9 Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Gargate, Siddharth sgarg...@ptc.com
wrote:
But what you were
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Alexander Ramos Jardim
alexander.ramos.jar...@gmail.com wrote:
Shalin,
Just to remember that with he is indexing more documents that he has memory
avaiable, it is a good thing to have autocommit set.
Yes, sorry, I had assumed that he has enough memory on the
Can you sample us the query you are doing and how you are indexing
documents?
2009/1/9 rohit arora rohitarora...@yahoo.com
Hi,
I have add one document only single time but the out put provided by lucene
give me
the same document multiple times..
If i specify rows=2 in out put same
Hey there,
I am stack in this problem sine 3 days ago and no idea how to sort it.
I am using the nighlty from a week ago, mysql and this driver and url:
driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
url=jdbc:mysql://localhost/my_db
I can use deduplication patch with indexs of 200.000 docs and no problem.
When I
Thanks again for your inputs.
But then I am still stuck on the question that how do we ensure that
document is successfully indexed. One option I see is search for every
document sent to solr. Or do we assume that autocommit always indexes
all the documents successfully?
Thanks,
Siddharth
Can you put the full log (as short as possibly demonstrates the
problem) somewhere where I can take a look? Likewise, can you share
your schema?
Also, does the spelling index exist under SOLR HOME/data/index? If
you open it w/ Luke, does it have entries?
Thanks,
Grant
On Jan 8, 2009,
I can't imagine why dedupe would have anything to do with this, other
than what was said, it perhaps is taking a bit longer to get a document
to the db, and it times out (maybe a long signature calculation?). Have
you tried changing your MySql settings to allow for a longer timeout?
(sorry,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:18 AM, smock harish.agar...@gmail.com wrote:
In some ways I have a 'small index' (~8 million documents at the moment).
However, I have a lot of attributes (currently about 30, but I'm expecting
that number to keep growing) and am interested in faceting across all of
Paul
I have looked at those, but want to learn how to do the easy things
first - as I posted below I can import example data and then search
against it. Data that I've tried to import seems to import, but I
can't search/find it, I want to know how to do this first, so if you
have any idea, I
Otis
Thanks for your reply, I wrote out a long email explaining the steps I
took, and the results, but it was returned by the Solr-user email
server stamped as spam. I've put my note on pastebin, you can see it
here: http://pastebin.cryer.us/pastebin.php?show=m359e2e47
I'd appreciate any
You do a commit in step 1 after the update, right? So if you configure Solr
on the indexer to invoke snapshooter after a commit and optimize, then you
would not need to invoke snapshooter explicitly using cron. snappuller
doesn't do anything unless there is a new snapshot on the indexer.
Bill
hey there,
I hadn't autoCommit set to true but I have it sorted! The error stopped
appearing after setting the property maxBufferedDocs in solrconfig.xml. I
can't exactly undersand why but it just worked.
Anyway, maxBufferedDocs is deprecaded, would ramBufferSizeMB do the same?
Thanks
Marc
Hi,
I am using solr admin page with index.jsp from
%-- $Id: index.jsp 686780 2008-08-18 15:08:28Z yonik $ --%
I am getting these errors. Any insight will be helpful.
HTTP Status 500 - javax.servlet.ServletException:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: config org.apache.jasper.JasperException:
You were searching for 1899 which is the value of the date field in the
document you added. You need to specify q=date:1899 to search on the date
field.
You can also use the defaultSearchField element in schema.xml to specify
the field on which you'd like to search if no field name is specified
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Marc Sturlese marc.sturl...@gmail.comwrote:
hey there,
I hadn't autoCommit set to true but I have it sorted! The error stopped
appearing after setting the property maxBufferedDocs in solrconfig.xml. I
can't exactly undersand why but it just worked.
Hey Shalin,
In the begining (when the error was appearing) i had
ramBufferSizeMB32/ramBufferSizeMB
and no maxBufferedDocs set
Now I have:
ramBufferSizeMB32/ramBufferSizeMB
maxBufferedDocs50/maxBufferedDocs
I think taht setting maxBufferedDocs to 50 I am forcing more disk writting
than I would
Your basically writing segments more often now, and somehow avoiding a
longer merge I think. Also, likely, deduplication is probably adding
enough extra data to your index to hit a sweet spot where a merge is too
long. Or something to that effect - MySql is especially sensitive to
timeouts
hi,
I'm looking through the list archives and the documentation on boost
queries, and I don't see anything that matches this case.
I have an index of documents, some of which are very similar but not
identical. Therefore the scores are very close and the ordering is affected
by somewhat
Hey Mark,
Sorry I was not enough especific, I wanted to mean that I have and I always
had autoCommit=false.
I will do some more traces and test. Will post if I have any new important
thing to mention.
Thanks.
Marc Sturlese wrote:
Hey Shalin,
In the begining (when the error was appearing)
On Jan 9, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Eric Kilby wrote:
Each document has a multivalued field, with 1-n values in it (as
many as
20). The actual values don't matter to me, but the number of values
is a
rough proxy for the quality of a record. I'd like to apply a very
small
boost based on the
On Jan 8, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Yevgeniy Belman wrote:
the response i get when executing only the following, produces no
facet
counts. It could be a bug.
facet.query=[price:[* TO 500], price:[500 TO *]
That's an invalid query. If you want two ranges, use two facet.query
parameters.
Hi,
Thanks for the help.
If i'm understanding you correctly, you modified the MoreLikeThis class to
include your new clause (using those two lines above) correct?
Yes.
The time field is a long and so is the range variables, so the
problem should not be related to that. If I construct the query
Please bear with me. I am new to Solr. I have searched all the existing posts
about this and could not find an answer. I wanted to know how do I go about
creating a
SolrServer using EmbeddedSolrServer. I tried to initialize this several ways
but was unsuccesful. I do not have multi-core. I am
: Thanks again for your inputs.
: But then I am still stuck on the question that how do we ensure that
: document is successfully indexed. One option I see is search for every
Have faith.
If the add completes successfully then the data made it to solr, was
indexed, and now lives in the index
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-442
Haven't used Nutch. Can the Nutch-generated index be reverse-engineered into
a Solr schema? In that case, you can just copy the Lucene index files away
from Nutch and run them under Solr.
Thanks Lance! I have no idea whether the Nuth-generated index could be
converted to Solr schema. I wonder what people are using this NUTCH-442 for
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-442).
So what crawler do you use to generate index for Solr? Thanks a lot!!
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:04
The UUID field type is not documented on the Wiki.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-308
The ExtractingRequestHandler creates its own UUID instead of using the UUID
field type.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-284
I don't know about the Nutch format - Solr schema idea either. The
NUTCH-442 system uses Solr for both indexing and searching, and uses Nutch
for only crawling.
At my last job we had a custom scripting system that crawled the front page
of over 5000 sites. Each site had a configured script. Yes,
On Jan 9, 2009, at 8:12 PM, qp19 wrote:
Please bear with me. I am new to Solr. I have searched all the
existing posts
about this and could not find an answer. I wanted to know how do I
go about
creating a
SolrServer using EmbeddedSolrServer. I tried to initialize this
several ways
43 matches
Mail list logo
