Thank you for your reply. You were right, I could run the targets from
build.xml :working:.
All the best,
Viorel
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:31 PM, viorelhojda viorelho...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hello. I've downloaded SOLR using the SVN and Eclipse IDE. After
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Bernadette Houghton
bernadette.hough...@deakin.edu.au wrote:
Am very new to SOLR, so this question may seem overly basic -
In schema.xml, I have a date field type -
fieldType name=date class=solr.DateField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=true/
used by
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Avlesh Singh avl...@gmail.com wrote:
However the RuntimeException that Solr throws has a misleading error
message
- ... but it's impossible to sort on tokenized fields. The field in this
case is untokenized.
The error is thrown by Lucene. Actually, multi
The error is thrown by Lucene. Actually, multi valued fields are not very
different from tokenized fields. Multiple values are indexed with their
respective token positions differing by the positionIncrementGap value as
specified in schema.
I truly understand that. But I guess, that is
Hello,
I need to sort my hits according to a rate of popularity which
dynamically and periodically changes. Thus, I can't store this
popularity in the index and I have to get it, from memory, at query-time.
Is it possible with Solr ? Thank you.
Fabrice
Rahul R schrieb:
I tried using a profiling tool - Yourkit. The trial version was free for 15
days. But I couldn't find anything of significance.
You should try to generate heap dumps and analyze the heap using a tool
like the Eclipse Memory Analyzer. Maybe it helps spotting a group of
objects
Searches would be for documents (rooms) that don't have certain dates in
their multi-valued fields for the a particular month.
E.g if you wanted to find out rooms available on 15th, 16th and 17th of
August, the query could be:
q=!(+reserved_dates_August:15 +reserved_dates_August:16
Hi all,
I am having a solr single instance.Now i just want to use Solr Multi Core.
So for this i just change solr.xml -
solr persistent=true
cores adminPath=/admin/cores persistent=true
core name=core0
instanceDir=C:\PointCross\WIP\DevBuild\trunk\Orchestra Product\Search\solr
Hi,
This seems like a bit of an unconventional suggestion but it just might
work.
I'd have to add the year because things might end up reserved far ahead, or
they might be reserved again on the same day next year.
I do have 2 questions:
1) Wouldn't it be terribly inefficient when I have
On Aug 11, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Bill Au wrote:
It looks like things have changed a bit since this subject was last
brought
up here. I see that there are support in Solr/Lucene for indexing
payload
data (DelimitedPayloadTokenFilterFactory and
DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter).
Overriding the
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Constantijn Visinescu
baeli...@gmail.comwrote:
doc
str name=nameRoom1/str
date name=reserved_from_112000-08-01T00:00:00Z/date
date
I'd have to add the year because things might end up reserved far ahead, or
they might be reserved again on the same day next year.
If that is the case, then yes you'll have to take year into account too.
Wouldn't it be terribly inefficient when I have 10million+ documents in my
index and i
Is it possible with Solr ?
My understanding says, No.
I am waiting to be surprised.
Cheers
Avlesh
2009/8/12 Fabrice Estiévenart fabrice.estieven...@cetic.be
Hello,
I need to sort my hits according to a rate of popularity which
dynamically and periodically changes. Thus, I can't store
Hello. I'm trying to do some speed tests on the SOLR server (Average Response
Time, etc). I tried all kinds of tool and software but I didn't manage
because at one point some errors appeared. The *:* query works just fine,
but when I try to test another query the tool complains that the
Hmm .. I looked up the transformer class and that should work, thanks for
the tip :)
Thinking about it a bit more, wouldn't it be easier to just add a field like
field name=reserved_date type=sint indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true /
And use a function in the transformer to converts the
It somehow looks that the solr is started as a single core. are you
sure the solr.solr.home points to a directory which contains the
solr.xml
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:00 PM, deepak agrawaldk.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am having a solr single instance.Now i just want to use Solr Multi
field name=reserved_date type=sint indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true /
I think this should be good enough with the number of days since ... kind
of data.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Constantijn Visinescu
baeli...@gmail.comwrote:
Hmm .. I looked up the transformer
Ok, i'm going to go and implement this solution then. Thanks for the help :)
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Avlesh Singh avl...@gmail.com wrote:
field name=reserved_date type=sint indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true /
I think this should be good enough with the number of days
2009/8/12 Fabrice Estiévenart fabrice.estieven...@cetic.be
Hello,
I need to sort my hits according to a rate of popularity which
dynamically and periodically changes. Thus, I can't store this popularity in
the index and I have to get it, from memory, at query-time.
Is it possible with Solr
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:07 PM, viorelhojda viorelho...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello. I'm trying to do some speed tests on the SOLR server (Average
Response
Time, etc). I tried all kinds of tool and software but I didn't manage
because at one point some errors appeared. The *:* query works just
yaa it points the directory contains solr.xml.
But Solr Folder having the conf and bin folder.
for multicore any other thing is required.
2009/8/12 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@corp.aol.com
It somehow looks that the solr is started as a single core. are you
sure the solr.solr.home
Thank you for your suggestions. Since my initial email, I have
found/guessed two other indications :
- The CustomScoreQuery of Lucene :
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/search/function/package-summary.html
- To create a temporary index, at query-time, containing the
Some thoughts below, sorry for the late reply...
On Aug 6, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Mark Bennett wrote:
I'm investigating a problem I bet some of you have hit before, and
exploring
several options to address it. I suspect that this specific IDF
scenario is
common enough that it even has a name,
Forwarding the ApacheCon announcement. Also note we have a lot of
Lucene ecosystem talks and a meetup scheduled, as well as training on
both Lucene and Solr, so I hope you will join us.
Cheers,
Grant
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org
Date: August 7, 2009
Hi Grant,
Looks like I temporarily solved the problem with not-so-obvious settings:
ramBufferSizeMB=8192
mergeFactor=10
Starting from scratch on a different hardware (with much more RAM and CPU;
regular SATA) I have added/updated 30 millions docs within 3 hours...
without any merge yet! Index
Thank a lot Jason!
I'll go into depths with MergePolicy;
I use temporarily ramBufferSizeMB=8192 mergeFactor=10 and looks like I
have constantly few thousands docs per second with very rare merge (already
3 hours, 8Gb index size, 30 mlns docs)
I don't do delete; I execute SOLR /update and I
First thing I see (and it may be it) is that nextDoc must also set the
doc - not just return it.
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Stephen Duncan Jr stephen.dun...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is with trunk for Solr
Doesn't that happen with the call to
this.termDocs.next()
? Since I'm essentially delegating the tracking to the TermDocs object?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
First thing I see (and it may be it) is that nextDoc must also set the doc
- not just
Hi everyone,
I'm using some faceting on a solr index containing ~ 160K documents.
I perform facets on multivalued string fields. The number of possible
different values is quite large.
Enabling facets degrades the performance by a factor 3.
Because I'm using solr 1.3, I guess the facetting
Jerome,
Yes you need to increase the filterCache size to something close to
unique number of facet elements. But also consider the RAM required to
accommodate the increase.
I did see a significant performance gain by increasing the filterCache size
Thanks,
Kalyan Manepalli
Hi
I am using Solr 1.3 ( official released version) and JDk1.5. My company is
moving towards upgrading all systems to JDK1.6. is it safe to upgrade to JDK1.6
with Solr 1.3 wars? Are there any compatible issues with JDK1.6?
Thanks
Vaibhav
Hey,
I noticed in recent SVN versions the example/solr/bin dir has been empty.
I understand the various snappulling scripts are basically deprecated since
replication is now handled in-process, however I was wondering what is the
state of the
optimize script, i.e how do I control optimization
Hi,
I'm running solr 1.3 with java -version java version 1.6... .
No problem to report.
Cheers.
J
2009/8/12 vaibhav joshi callvaib...@hotmail.com:
Hi
I am using Solr 1.3 ( official released version) and JDk1.5. My company is
moving towards upgrading all systems to JDK1.6. is it safe to
A script isn't really needed for something as simple as a commit:
curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/update?commit=true'
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:27 PM, KaktuChakarabatijimmoe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I noticed in recent SVN versions the example/solr/bin
Then replace commit with optimize?
curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/update?optimize=true'
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:43 PM, KaktuChakarabatijimmoe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Yonik,
Thanks for the quick reply, However my first question was more specific:
We have been using solr 1.3 with jdk1.6 for quite sometime in production, no
issues yet
Thanks,
Kalyan Manepalli
-Original Message-
From: vaibhav joshi [mailto:callvaib...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1:21 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 1.3 and JDK1.6
Same works with optimize... /solr/update?optimize=true
Erik
On Aug 12, 2009, at 2:43 PM, KaktuChakarabati wrote:
Hey Yonik,
Thanks for the quick reply, However my first question was more
specific:
* I'm not worried about a commit but about the *optimize* operation
which I
might
I am currently faceting on tokenized multi-valued field at
http://www.tokenizer.org (25 mlns simple docs)
It uses some home-made quick fixes similar to SOLR-475 (SOLR-711) and
non-synchronized cache (similar to LingPipe's FastCache, SOLR-665, SOLR-667)
Average faceting on query results: 0.2 -
Oracle JRockit (Mission Control 1.3) latest-greatest (Java 6), -server, AMD64,
SLES 10
Solr 1.3/1.4
Tomcat 6.0.20, APR
No any problem. But you need licensing for production.
JRockit seems to be at least 20 times faster than SUN's JVM.
P.S.
I only had constant problems with latest Apache
Hey Yonik,
Thanks for the quick reply, However my first question was more specific:
* I'm not worried about a commit but about the *optimize* operation which I
might want to run very infrequently
in respect to commits ( e.g I can commit every 15 minutes but optimize
once a day )
Yonik
Yes, increasing the filterCache size will help with Solr 1.3
performance.
Do note that trunk (soon Solr 1.4) has dramatically improved faceting
performance.
Erik
On Aug 12, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jérôme Etévé wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm using some faceting on a solr index containing ~
Is there a way to do this via a URL?
Hi,
Does the latest version of Solr 1.4 dev (including DIH) take advantage of
Lucene's Near Realtime Search features? I've read several past postings
about providing near-real time search using a small and large index and was
wondering if that will still be necessary when Solr 1.4 releases.
: I noticed in recent SVN versions the example/solr/bin dir has been empty.
FYI: example/solr/bin is empty, because thescripts aren't part of the
example anymore ... but the scripts themselves are still included in the
releases (src/scripts)
-Hoss
Hmmm...perhaps my original note was a bit TLTR. Trying again:
The v1.3 docs say that one can pass one's own parameters in to DIH via
the HTTP request:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#head-520f8e527d9da55e8ed1e274e29709c8805c8eae
SO if I have a URL like the following to
Hi Alan,
Solr 1.4 does not contain near realtime search capabilities and
it could be variously detrimental to call commit too often as
indexing and searches could precipitously degrade. That being
said, most of the NRT functionality is not too difficult to add,
except for per segment caching
For your fields with many terms you may want to try Bobo
http://code.google.com/p/bobo-browse/ which could work well with your
case.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Fuad Efendif...@efendi.ca wrote:
I am currently faceting on tokenized multi-valued field at
http://www.tokenizer.org (25 mlns
I believe it will be, but am not sure of the procedure for
distributing. I think if you register, but don't show, you will get a
notification.
-Grant
On Aug 10, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Lucas F. A. Teixeira wrote:
Hello Grant,
Will the webinar be recorded and available to download later
As of right now when I installed and configure the Solr, I will get example
dir ( like /opt/apache-solr-1.3.0/example ).
How can I change that to something else, because example to me is not real?
Thanks
Francis
My hunch, though I'll try to make some time to test this out
thoroughly, is that the entity is parsed initially with variables
resolved, but not per request. Variables/expressions do get expanded
for fields of course, but perhaps not for other high-level attributes?
Erik
On Aug
Is there a way to do this currently? If a shard takes an
inordinate amount of time compared to the other shards, it's useful
to see the various qtimes per shard, with the aggregated results.
Hello,
We have Solr running with the defaultOperator set to AND. Am not
able to get any results for queries like q=( Ferrari AND ( 599 GTB
Fiorano OR 612 Scaglietti OR F430 )) , which contain ( for
grouping. Anyone have any ideas for a workaround ?
Thanks
madhu
Note that depending on the profile of your field (full text and how many
unique terms on average per document), the improvements from 1.4 may not
apply, as you may exceed the limits of the new faceting technique in Solr
1.4.
-Stephen
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Erik Hatcher
Any one has any inputs for this? I really appreciated.
Thanks
Francis
-Original Message-
From: Francis Yakin [mailto:fya...@liquid.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:39 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: Example dir
As of right now when I installed and configure the
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty#head-5663a826c263727cad83bc58cac0cb02f53d6a80
SolrJetty
and others
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrInstall#head-ec97d15a70656e9c0308009db70d71af3efc7cd2
2009/8/13 Francis Yakin fya...@liquid.com
Any one has any inputs for this? I really appreciated.
*You should try to generate heap dumps and analyze the heap using a tool
like the Eclipse Memory Analyzer. Maybe it helps spotting a group of
objects holding a large amount of memory*
The tool that I used also allows to capture heap snap shots. Eclipse had a
lot of pre-requisites. You need to
56 matches
Mail list logo
