Sixten Otto wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
- changed to SOLR branch_3x. Installs fine, runs fine, luke works fine but
the extraction with /update/extract (ExtractingRequestHandler) only replies
the metadata but not the content.
Hi,
I wanted to try out field collapsing for a requirement. i went through
the wiki and solr-236. but there are lot of patch files. and the comments
below left me confused.
i tried applyin the patch file on 1.4.0 release but ended up with many
compile errors.
i even downloaded the latest
Dear Solr gurus,
I am still currently running a script which says that the Solr software is still
commiting the data:
==
INFO: [] Registered new searcher searc...@3b48a17a main
Jun 16, 2010 12:56:58 PM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher close
INFO: Closing
Hello again Nabble :D
TermsComponent works fine so far, but how can i get the same result for the
typing:
harry pot - harry potter AND
potter harr - harry potter
i try ReversedWildcardFilterFactory, but i dont want the reversed Word. i
want the reversed sentence. ^^
thx
--
View this
hello all,
I wanna know that how can we access terms vectors in lucene.. actually i making
a project where i need tf idf values of all the terms in the documents.. but i
m unable to get any reference eg where it shows how to use these term vectors
to get the tf idf values of ALL the terms in
Hello,
Yes, this looks like it's working correctly - it looks like the docs are
getting committed.
You should see some logging messages about the searcher being reloaded after
the commit. When that happens you will see your changes in the index.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/
Bernd,
Not everything has to be bundled in one package. :)
Luke is a separate project. It also depends on some software that makes it
unsuitable for bundling with Lucene/Solr for licensing reasons.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search ::
Hi,
Look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-795?focusedCommentId=12642870page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12642870
Look for buildOn string in various example solrconfigs.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene -
Lutz,
Look at this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Passing_commit_parameters_as_part_of_the_URL
You should be able to do this with your spellchecker index, too.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search ::
Hello,
The closest thing to this with Solr is a Repeater:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Setting_up_a_Repeater
A Repeater is an instance that acts as both the master and slave at the same
time.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem
Hi Rakhi,
You are supposed to get the code for solr 1.4 from SVN here:
http:/svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/tags/
Then apply the path to it and comppile. It should work.
However, you will probably get an error at run time saying some java
class is missing. I haven't been able to figure
Frank,
Is the following what you are after:
Here is a query for my last name, but misspelled:
http://search-lucene.com/?q=gospodneticc
But if you look above the results, you will see this text:
Search results for gospodnetic :
... and the search results are indeed for the auto-corrected
Hello,
Thank you for your help.
Q1: Do I have to wait until all the data is fully committed before querying?
Q2: I put '*:*' (without quotes) in the admin query box. Is that the correct
syntax for a search?
Q3: Why did it come back with no results if the data is being committed?
Again, any help
Hello,
A1: you can search and commit concurrently. Sounds like you are using 1 box
with Solr to both index and search. Solr is typically deployed a multi-node
cluster where 1 of those nodes is a master that does all indexing, and 1 or
more slaves perform searches.
A2: *:* is correct
A3:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your response.
My issue now is that the response header is not at all consistent.
Sometimes the response header is in this format,
- responseHeader
status0/status
QTime/QTime
- lst name=params
str name=qcredit/str
/lst
/responseHeader
sometimes its in
Hi,
I am facing issues in getting back the response header correctly in
different OS (Windows / Linux).
I could see that in windows OS, the version of response handler is set to
2.2 by default and even without specifying the version in the query I am
getting the proper response header.
In
BB,
You can set the versoin param default in solrconfig.xml. Here is a snippet:
requestHandler name=standard class=solr.SearchHandler
default=true
!-- default values for query parameters --
lst name=defaults
str
name=echoParamsexplicit/str
int
name=rows10/int
Dean,
In general, you'll get more help about Nutch with Solr on the Nutch list than
on the Solr one.
Here it the info:
http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/RunningNutchAndSolr
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
Hello community,
from several discussions about Solr and Nutch, I got some questions for a
virtual web-search-engine.
I know I've posted this message to the mailing list a few days ago, but the
thread got injected and at least I did not get any more postings about the
topic and so I try to
My quick feedback would be:
Try using Nutch first, because it is a more complete platform. From what I
know, Droids is just the crawler with an in-memory queue + link extractor. We
did use it for crawling Lucene project sites (for the index on
http://search-lucene.com/ ), but that is because
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dean,
In general, you'll get more help about Nutch with Solr on the Nutch list
than on the Solr one.
Here it the info:
http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/RunningNutchAndSolr
Otis
Sematext ::
Actually I take that back. I am just as lost as you. I wish there was
a tutorial on how to do this (although I get the feeling that once I
know how to do it I will go ohh... I can't believe I couldn't figure
that out)
- Moazzam
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Moazzam Khan moazz...@gmail.com
I've had the best luck checking out the newest Solr/Lucene (so the 1.5-line)
from SVN, then just doing patch -p0 SOLR-236-trunk.patch from inside the
trunk directory. I just did it against the newest checkout and it works fine
still.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Moazzam Khan
Thank you for the feedback, Otis.
Yes, I thought that such an approach is usefull if the number of pages to
crawl is relatively low.
However, what about using solr + nutch?
Exists the problem that this would not scale, if the index becomes too
large, up to now?
What about extending nutch with
Mitch,
I think you really have 2 distinct questions there:
One question is Nutch vs. Droids.
The other one is Solr vs. Nutch for search.
My suggestions:
* Use Nutch, not Droids, if scaling is important
* Use Solr, not Nutch's search webapp
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr -
Vitaliy:
Check http://blog.sematext.com/2010/06/01/hbase-digest-may-2010/ and
http://twitter.com/otisg/status/16320594923
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Vitaliy
Thanks, that really helps to find the right beginning for such a journey. :-)
* Use Solr, not Nutch's search webapp
As far as I have read, Solr can't scale, if the index gets too large for one
Server
The setup explained here has one significant caveat you also need to keep
in mind:
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermVectorComponent YOu might also be
interested in the TermsComponent: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:47 AM, sarfaraz masood wrote:
hello all,
I wanna know that how can we access terms vectors in lucene.. actually i
Hi Mitch,
Solr can do distributed search, so it can definitely handle indices that can't
fit on a single server without sharding. What I think *might* be the case that
the Nutch indexer that sends docs to Solr might not be capable of sending
documents to multiple Solr cores/shards. If that
So using LocalParams with dollar-sign references to other parameters.
In LocalParams in general, you can use single-quotes for values that
have spaces in them:
{!dismax qf='field^5 field2^10'}= no problem
And even if the value does not have spaces, you can use single quotes
too, why
Nutch does not, at this moment, support some form of consistent hashing to
select an appropriate shard. It would be nice if someone could file an issue in
Nutch' Jira to add sharding support to it, perhaps someone with a better
understanding and more experience with Solr's distributed search
Well, it's not that Nutch doesn't support it. Solr itself doesn't support it.
Indexing applications need to know which shard they want to send documents to.
This may be a good case for a new wish issue in Solr JIRA?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene
You're right. Currently clients need to take care of this, in this case, Nutch
would be the client but it cannot be configured as such. It would, indeed, be
more appropriate for Solr to take care of this. We can already query any server
with a set of shard hosts specified, so it would make
Hi,
I have SOLR instances running in both Linux / windows server (same version /
same index data). Search performance is good in windows box compared to
Linux box.
Some queries takes more than 10 seconds in Linux box but takes just a second
in windows box. Have anyone encountered this kind of
So just to throw the idea out there, what would happen if I shutdown and
created a new solrServer on reindex? We only reindex daily. Will that
force the reread of all lucene files?
John
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:47 PM, John Ament my.repr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I wrote a small app using
I did the same thing. And, the code compiles without the patch but
when I apply the patch I get these errors:
[javac] C:\svn\solr\src\java\org\apache\solr\search\fieldcollapse\collector\
FieldValueCountCollapseCollectorFactory.java:127: class, interface, or enum expe
cted
[javac] import
BB,
Could it be that you are comparing apples and oranges?
* Is the hardware identical?
* Are indices identical?
* Are JVM versions the same?
* Are JVM arguments identical?
* Are the two boxes equally idle when Solr is not running?
* etc.
In general, no, there is no reason why Windows would
Thats a good note.
I get this kind of question a lot.
Most of the time, the reason is because there are database servers (MySQL)
and Webservers (Apache) and other processes running on the Linux box.
Try to verify that the load, number of processors/cores as well as other
environment settings
I got the code from trunk again and now I get this error:
[javac] symbol : class StringIndex
[javac] location: interface org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache
[javac] private final MapString, FieldCache.StringIndex fieldCaches =
new HashMapString, FieldCache.StringIndex();
: My issue now is that the response header is not at all consistent.
:
: Sometimes the response header is in this format,
...
: sometimes its in this format (for same query)
same query differnet solr instance, or same query same server?
please be specific .. show us URLs, show us
: Can someone please explain what the inform method should accomplish? Thanks
whatever you want it to acomplish ... it's just a hook that (some types
of) plugins can use to finish their initialize themselves after init() has
been called on the SolrCore and all of the other plugins.
(it's a
: Can someone explain how to register a SolrEventListener?
*typically* it's done using the listener syntax as noted on the wiki
page you linked to However...
: I am actually interested in using the SpellCheckerListener and it appears
...that listener is designed to be registred for you
Blargy?
I produced a patched version of Solr 1.4 and released it into the maven central
repository under our DSpace groupid as a dependency for our applications. Your
welcome to test it out and use our code for examples. Although, it is not the
most recent patch of Field Collapsing, it has
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
{!dismax qf=$some_qf} = no problem, and debugQuery reveals it is indeed
using the qf I desire.
{!dismax qf='$some_qf'} = Solr throws undefined field $some_qf.
Is this a bug in Solr?
Nope, it's by design.
Parameter
This is the tool in Solr for indexing various kinds of content. After
you learn the basics of indexing (see solr/example/exampledocs for
samples), the ExtractingRequestHandler will make sense:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:35 AM, seesiddharth
I have lecture transcripts with start and stop times for each word. The time
codes allow us to search the transcripts, and show the part of the lecture
video that contain the search results. I want to structure the index so that I
can search the transcripts for phrases, and have the search
With last night's build of solr, I am trying to use the MailEntityProcessor
to index an email account. However, when I call my dataimport url, I
receive a class cast exception:
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/dataimport params={command=full-import} status=0
QTime=44
Jun 16, 2010 8:16:03 PM
Is it generally wiser to build the dictionary from the existing index? Search
Log? Other?
For Did you mean does one usually just use collate=true and then return
that string?
Should I be using a separate spellchecker handler to should I just always
include spellcheck=true in my original search
There is a 1-[0,1] relationship between Person and Address with address_id
being the nullable foreign key.
I think you should be good with single query/entity then (no need for
nested entities)
entity name=person query=select person.id, person.name,
person.address_id, address.zipcode from
Follow up question.
How can I influence the scoring of results that comeback either through
term frequency (if i build of an index) or through # of search results
returned (if using a search log)?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
Im trying to apply this via the command line patch -p0 SOLR-1316.patch.
When patching against trunk I get the following errors.
~/workspace $ patch -p0 SOLR-1316.patch
patching file
dev/trunk/solr/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/SpellCheckComponent.java
Hunk #2 succeeded at 575
Good morning!
Great feedback from you all. This really helped a lot to get an impression
of what is possible and what is not.
What is interesting to me are some detail questions.
Let's assume Solr is possible to work on his own with distributed indexing,
so that the client does not need to
52 matches
Mail list logo
