Hi,
Can anybody help me to sort out an issue of forward slash in solr search .
I've a category combo box and I'm searching based on the category.
Everything working fine except forward slash
My category is Computer / IT and its not showing the result.
But when I removed the leading and
First you have to check that your indexing process can cause of removing the
whitespace
-
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/forward-slash-not-working-in-my-solr-search-tp2204326p2204336.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
On 1/6/2011 1:37 PM, Grijesh.singh wrote:
First you have to check that your indexing process can cause of removing the
whitespace
-
Grijesh
While indexing to server I added the category as 'Computer / IT', but
when I search with same keyword I am not getting any result.
But when I changed
By SUBTRACT you mean:
Add those docs that apply to fq1 or fq2 but not to fq1 AND fq2 (those, that
apply to one of these fqs but not to both)?
Lance Norskog-2 wrote:
AND/OR/NOT/SUBTRACT combinations for filters would certainly be a
useful feature.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Em
check with debugQuery=on and also with analysis.jsp ,what happening with your
query term and indexed terms.
-
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/forward-slash-not-working-in-my-solr-search-tp2204326p2204436.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
add parameter fl=*,score with your query url,
It will return all fields with score of every document
-
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/get-score-value-tp2204353p2204458.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 1/6/2011 2:06 PM, Grijesh.singh wrote:
check with debugQuery=on and also with analysis.jsp ,what happening with your
query term and indexed terms.
-
Grijesh
When I debug the query, I got the parsedquery as category:Computer
Here is debugged output
lst name=debug
str
use as pharase it will work like Computer / IT for you
Here IT is a stopword when you are trying query as
category:Computer / IT
parsed as category:Computer default-search-field:IT
but IT is a stopword for default search field what you have selected
so second query removed and only
I think 3.1 will be next, but I don't see a date yet. I would hope sometime
soon, but I haven't checked the outstanding issues recently.
On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Adam Estrada wrote:
I know this is a bit premature but does anyone have an anticipated release
date for Solr4.0? I looked at
Did you try adding the parameter group.sort=popularity+desc to the URL? I
think that's what you want, according to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing.
Good luck
Juan Grande
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Andy angelf...@yahoo.com wrote:
I want to group my results by a field named
@iorixxx:
I ran: http://localhost:8983/solr/db/update/?optimize=true
This is the response:
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime58/int
/lst
/response
Then I ran:
Thanks Grant! Ridiculous question #2. What is the difference between 3.1 and
4.0? I am very confused about this...
Adam
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I think 3.1 will be next, but I don't see a date yet. I would hope sometime
Disclaimer: I am not actually familiar with the solr code, all of the below is
extrapolation from being pretty familiar with Solr's behavior.
Yeah, it would be nice, but it would be a lot harder to code for solr. Right
now, the thing putting and retrieving entries into/from the filter cache
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Estrada Groups
estrada.adam.gro...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Grant! Ridiculous question #2. What is the difference between 3.1 and
4.0? I am very confused about this...
Hopefully this will help:
3.1 is a minor release from Lucene 3.0. It contains new features
You have a problem with the analysis chain. When you do a query, the
EnglishPorterFilter is cutting off the last part of your word, but you're
not doing the same when indexing. I think that removing that filter from the
chain will solve your problem.
Remember that there are two different analysis
That was it! thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-similar-values-for-same-field-results-in-different-results-tp2199269p2206087.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm completely new to this but I've managed to set up a Solr instance that is
pulling data from a MySql database. The records are artists (e.g. bands,
performers, musicians, etc) with the following schema:
fields
field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true
required=true /
field
Hey Adam,
The Solr/Lucene people decided that with versions post the Solr/Lucene merge
that they would sync the Solr version with the Lucene version (meaning there is
no 1.5 release or plans for it, which IMHO as I noted before is confusing).
Here's a pointer to a former discussion thread
Hi all,
I'm configuring solr to index some documents.
I index these fields:
aaa/1.0/sample-1
When I search for 'aaa/1.0/sample-1word' or 'wordaaa/1.0/sample-1'
solr doesn't find any document.
If I search for 'aaa/1.0/sample-1' or a substring of 'aaa/1.0/sample-1'
I obviously
Jonathan I think you are right.
A parser should not know anything about internal caching etc.
However, I can imagine that this could probably become a SearchComponent (as
far as I know SearchComponents can use the filterCache) that manages its own
filterCache.
With an own component we may
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to define your own function query
(like a plugin, instead of the already defined ones in
herehttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery)
that I could later on use as insde bf? If so which is the class That I am
supposed to extend?
thank you,
Dante
I would like to know if it is possible to
define your own function query
(like a plugin, instead of the already defined ones in
herehttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery)
that I could later on use as insde bf? If so which is the
class That I am
supposed to extend?
Hi,
if i search for a german umlaut like ä or ö i get something like weird
conversions from latin to utf in query response. The encoding of the result is
ok,
but not the you queried for this part. There is my ä wrong encoded. There
it seems like it had been interpreted from latin to utf 8.
--- On Thu, 1/6/11, Amdebirhan, Samson, VF-Group
samson.amdebir...@vodafone.com wrote:
From: Amdebirhan, Samson, VF-Group samson.amdebir...@vodafone.com
Subject: search terms as substring of query
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thursday, January 6, 2011, 5:41 PM
Hi all,
I'm
I want to place the schema.xml in a place other than conf folder. Is it
possible?
This is as part of master and slave configuration. I want to place all the
files which will be common between master and slave in a particular
location.
Can anyone help me on this?
--
View this message in context:
--- On Thu, 1/6/11, lazymanc moorhouse.p...@gmail.com wrote:
From: lazymanc moorhouse.p...@gmail.com
Subject: Fuzzy search and field weighting/boosting
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thursday, January 6, 2011, 5:12 PM
I'm completely new to this but I've managed to set up a
Solr
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Julian Hille julian.hi...@netimpact.de wrote:
Hi,
if i search for a german umlaut like ä or ö i get something like weird
conversions from latin to utf in query response. The encoding of the result
is ok,
but not the you queried for this part. There is my ä
Wow, a fast response and exactly what I needed, much appreciated!
No doubt they'll be more questions to follow over the coming weeks, cheers
:)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Fuzzy-search-and-field-weighting-boosting-tp2206091p2206738.html
Sent from the
Solr/lucene newbie here ..
We would like searches against a solr/lucene index to immediately be able to
view data that was added. I stress small amount of new data given that
any significant amount would require excessive latency.
Looking around, i'm wondering if the direction would be a
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Stephen Boesch java...@gmail.com wrote:
Solr/lucene newbie here ..
We would like searches against a solr/lucene index to immediately be able to
view data that was added. I stress small amount of new data given that
any significant amount would require
Thanks
thats the bottle neck i am strugging with. i have configured the jndi lookup
for solr home many times on my pc no issues, but just a bit clueless on how
to go with a remote machine. here is te exact snipped i have in my web.xml
please have a look and tell me is there something wrong with
Thanks Yonik,
Using a stable release of Solr what would you suggest to do - given
MultiSearch's demise and the other work is still ongoing?
2011/1/6 Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Stephen Boesch java...@gmail.com wrote:
Solr/lucene newbie here ..
Ok got it
The problem was very simple, thanks to post i just have to comment the
following line in solrconfig.xml
dataDir${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}/dataDir
and that seems to do the trick
Thanks guys
--
View this message in context:
I want to group my results by a field named group_id.
However, some of my documents don't contain the field group_id. But I still
want these documents to be returned as part of the results as long as they
match the main query q.
Do I need to do anything to tell Solr that I want those
Hi,
our index files have been created using Lucene 2.9.3 and solr 1.4.1.
I am trying to use a patched version of the current trunk (solr 1.5.0 ? ).
The patched version works fine with newly generated index data but
not with our existing data:
After adjusting the solrconfig.xml - I added the
What if you put in a default value for the group_id field in the solr schema -
would that work for you? e.g. something like 'unknown' Then you'll get all
those with no original group_id value still grouped together, and you can
figure out at display time what you want to do with them.
Bob
So by default Solr will not return documents that don't contain the specified
group.field?
--- On Thu, 1/6/11, Bob Sandiford bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com wrote:
From: Bob Sandiford bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
Subject: RE: Will Result Grouping return documents that don't contain the
String type is unanalyzed. So what you put in the index better be exactly
what you query for, capitalization, spaces (internal and leading and
trailing etc).
So you are NOT searching the exact same thing, the spaces are different.
String
type is quite literal, and exact means exact.
You really
Why do you want to do this? What is the use case? There is already a
provision
for copying modified slave configurations from the master and renaming it in
the
process, would that suffice?
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Shanmugavel SRD
srdshanmuga...@gmail.comwrote:
I want to
Correct. Given the fact that Solr only requires fields in documents where
required=true, how could it? The behavior of just put everything in a
bucket that doesn't have field X would produce some interesting
results
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andy angelf...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there anyway to configure Solr such that:
1) Documents that contain the specified group.field will be returned and
grouped by group.field,
AND
2) Documents that don't contain the specified group.field will just be
returned as normal search results without any grouping
Any way to achieve
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andy angelf...@yahoo.com wrote:
So by default Solr will not return documents that don't contain the specified
group.field?
Solr will. Documents without a value for that field should be grouped
under the null value.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Erick,
Thanks for your response. Our production environment is a read only file
system. It is not allowing to modify or create new files under conf folder
at runtime. So copy config through replication is not working for us.
Thanks,
SRD
--
View this message in context:
Concat doesn't work as expected.
Doing SELECT concat('blog-',id) as uuid instead of template
transformer the uuid in the index would be something like
str name=uuid[...@d760bb/str
instead of
str name=uuidblog-1/str
I haven't tested if DIH can perform delete when using concat but at
least
Forgot to mention that delete works fine with TemplateTransformer when
you are using it to create unique values for uniqueid field in solr
and that same field is defined as pk in data config.
schema.xml
field name=uuid type=string indexed=true stored=true required=true /
..
Hello list,
is it possible to load only selected documents with XPathEntityProcessor?
While loading docs I want to drop/skip/ignore documents with missing URL.
Example:
documents
document
titlefirst title/title
ididentifier_01/id
46 matches
Mail list logo
