You are right, i misread. Fields a copied first, then analyzed and then behave
like other fields and pass the same way through the update processor.
Cheers,
Markus,
I searched but I couldn't find a definite answer, so I posted this
question.
The article you quoted talks about implementing
Hi,
I am working on a setup where we will need fault tolerant indexing. This seems
not to be supported by Solr per default, and I wonder what the options are.
My plan is to:
* Use 2 separate, self-contained Solr nodes (no master-slave config in Solr)
* Use a hot standby failover setup in front
I created 2 tomcat instances. With respective folders tomcat0
tomcat1
And server xml edited with the different port numbers respecitvely(all the 3
ports).
Now when I am tryin to connect .. http://localhost:8090/ or
http://localhost:8091/
webpage failed to open in both the cases. Is
This is how I've got it:
A document first passes through the UpdateChain (processors), which is document
centric.
Then copyFields are processed
And finally the analysis in fieldTypes are processed
So you cannot use copyField before UpdateProcessors nor after Analysis :(
--
Jan Høydahl, search
Hi,
This is what we're aiming for SolrCloud and ZooKeeper to handle for us.
It does not currently do that, but the vision is that ZK will keep track of the
state of each node, and do master election and everything. Contributions
welcome :)
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud
--
Jan Høydahl,
Maybe copy fields should be refactored to happen in a new, core, update
processor, so there is nothing special/awkward about them? It seems they fit
as part of what an update processor is all about, augmenting/modifying incoming
documents.
Erik
On Feb 23, 2011, at 04:40 , Jan Høydahl
Hi,
I'm trying to reduce results from facets. (by category with my schema)
My category field is String type in my schema.xml.
The problem i've got is when the category value has space or special
caracter it doen't work?
Example:
?q=homefq=category:Appartement --- works fine
Hello,
you could try wrapping your fq terms in double quotes as in:
?q=homefq=category:Appartement Sale
On 23 February 2011 13:25, Rosa (Anuncios) rosaemailanunc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to reduce results from facets. (by category with my schema)
My category field is String
Try -
fq={!field f=category}insert value, URL encoded of course, here
You can also try surrounding with quotes, but that gets tricky and you'll need
to escape things possibly. Or you could simply backslash escape the whitespace
(and colon, etc) characters.
Erik
On Feb 23, 2011, at
Hi Eric,
could you please let us know where can we find more info about this notation
( fq={!field f=category})? What is it called, how to use it etc? Is there a
wiki page?
Thanks,
- Savvas
On 23 February 2011 14:17, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Try -
fq={!field
Savvas, have a look here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Eric,
could you please let us know where can we find more info about this notation
( fq={!field f=category})? What is
On Feb 23, 2011, at 09:25 , Savvas-Andreas Moysidis wrote:
Hi Eric,
could you please let us know where can we find more info about this notation
( fq={!field f=category})? What is it called, how to use it etc? Is there a
wiki page?
There's some details of this here:
Hi Jan,
I appreciate you attention.
I've tried to answer your questions to the best of my knowledge.
2011/2/22 Jan Høydahl / Cominvent [via Lucene]
ml-node+2551500-1071759141-363...@n3.nabble.com
Hi,
Please explain some more.
a) What version of Solr?
Solr version 1.4
b) Are you
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
There's some details of this here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
Oh yes, i'm wrong - just ignore my post .. got confused from the
similar syntax, i'm sorry.
Thanks Erik,
this works well.
the only thing, but i'm not sure is comes from there is with the accents:
q=memoire+sdfq={!field f=category}Electronique++Cartes+mémoires
any tricks for that?
I've noticed that i've got the same issue in a normal simple query?
Le 23/02/2011 15:17, Erik Hatcher
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:06 , Rosa (Anuncios) wrote:
Thanks Erik,
this works well.
the only thing, but i'm not sure is comes from there is with the accents:
q=memoire+sdfq={!field f=category}Electronique++Cartes+mémoires
any tricks for that?
Hard to say what the problem is. Maybe it
I've got it, the problem was from php-solr-client... for some reason the
php urlencode function does not work in this script? So the accent are
not converted.
Thanks anyway
Le 23/02/2011 16:11, Erik Hatcher a écrit :
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:06 , Rosa (Anuncios) wrote:
Thanks Erik,
this
Double quotes should work as well.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Feb 23, 2011, at 7:17 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Try -
fq={!field f=category}insert value, URL encoded of course, here
You can also try surrounding with quotes, but that gets tricky and you'll
need
Certain Utf characters are not valid and need to be stripped. BOT etc.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:29 AM, jayronsoares jayronsoa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jan,
I appreciate you attention.
I've tried to answer your questions to the best of my knowledge.
2011/2/22 Jan
That would improve things for recent documents, but documents that were
close to each other, but a long time from NOW, would still have very small
differences that would be susceptible to rounding errors that can cause
results to get shuffled.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Tue,
Thank you, that clarifies it. Good catch on -DAY. I had noticed it after
submitting but as -1DAY causes the same ParseException, I didn't amend the
question.
Andreas
From: Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue,
I'm really confused now. Is this page completely out of date -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting - as it seems to imply that
solr-792 is a form of hierarchical faceting. There are currently two
similar, non-competing, approaches to generating tree/hierarchical facets
from Solr:
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Jon Drukman j...@cluttered.com wrote:
From: Jon Drukman j...@cluttered.com
Subject: Sorting - bad performance
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 9:44 PM
The performance factors wiki says:
If you do a lot of field based sorting, it is
Hi guys,
I'm having some issues when trying to use the DataImportHandler on Solr
4.0.
I've downloaded the latest nightly build of Solr 4.0 and configured normally
(on the example folder) solrconfig.xml file like this:
requestHandler name=/dataimport
When you are working with full-imports in Solr you have to send over the net
all your index to your slaves, with the correspondent loss of time and
resources in some cases.
Is it a way to get the differences between two indexes and send only the
differences?
--
View this message in context:
Raimon,
You want to use incremental indexing instead of full reindexing. Look for
deltaQuery mentions on DIH Wiki page.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: raimon.bosch
Hi Greg,
I think you simply need to ID the language (e.g. Using Lang ID like
http://sematext.com/products/language-identifier/index.html ) and then
analyze/index it appropriately.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search ::
Hi,
What do you mean by this doesn't work fine? Does it not work correctly or is
it slow or ...
I was going to suggest you look at Surround QP, but it looks like you already
did that. Wouldn't it be better to get Surround QP to work?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr -
right now when I search for 'brake a leg', solr returns valid results with
no indication of misspelling, which is understandable since all of those
terms are valid words and are probably found in a few pieces of our content.
My question is:
is there any way for it to recognize that the phase
Hi Isha,
The patch is out of date. You need to look at the patch and rejection and
update your local copy of the code to match the logic from the patch, if it's
still applicable to the version of Solr source code you have.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hi Praveen,
I know this is not your original question, but if you have a product search
system, you should really look into adding auto-completion of queries to it.
Concretely, you probably want to start with auto-suggesting product names.
People like this, know how to use it, and it allows
Date Math is great.
NOW/MONTH, NOW/DAY are all working and very useful, so naively I tried
NOW/WEEK,
which failed.
Digging into the source code of DateMathParser.java, i found the following
comment:
99 // NOTE: consciously choosing not to support WEEK at this time,
100 //
Hi Otis,
The problem is that we are using hadoop for batch index building. So in this
case we are not capable to do incremental indexing by now. It will be cool
if we could simulate incremental indexing only for the index uploads.
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
This seems to be a tricky issue judging from the other replies. I'm just
thinking out of the box now and the following options come to mind:
1) can you store the timestamp in the session in your middleware for each
user? This way it stays fixed and doesn't change the order between
Jan,
So you are implying that the fields made by copyField are not processed by
UpdateProcessors, right?
Erik,
Logically this makes sense but then copyField operations must move to
solrconfig.xml?
Editing solrconfig.xml is more challenging than schema.xml, I feel.
Kuro
On 2/23/11 2:09 AM, Erik
Hi,
I may have misread it all but SolrJ is the Java client and you don't need it
for a pretty AJAX interface.
Cheers,
Hello list,
I'm in the process of trying to implement Ajax within my Solr-backed webapp
I have been reading both the Solrj wiki as well as the tutorial provided
via the
Hi guys,
I'm having some issues when trying to use the DataImportHandler on Solr 4.0.
I've downloaded the latest nightly build of Solr 4.0 and configured normally
(on the example folder) solrconfig.xml file like this:
requestHandler name=/dataimport
Hi,
The params you have suggest you're planning to use SweetSpotSimilarity. There
already is a factory you can use in Jira.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365
Cheers,
Hi,
I'm trying to use a CustomSimilarityFactory and pass in per-field
options from the schema.xml, like so:
Hi,
Scaling might be required. How large is the index going to be in number of
documents, fields and bytes and what hardware do you have? Powerful CPU's and a
lot of RAM will help. And, how many queries per second do you expect? And how
many updates per minute?
Depending on average document
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe copy fields should be refactored to happen in a new, core, update
processor, so there is nothing special/awkward about them? It seems they fit
as part of what an update processor is all about,
Hi,
I'd guess a non-200 HTTP response code would be more appropriate indeed but
it's just a detail.
A successful replication will change a few things on the slave:
- increment of generation value
- updated indexVersion value
- lastReplication will have a new timestamp
You can also check for a
Hi,
I am new to Solr, without any Java knowledge.
I downloaded and run Solr under Tomcat. At the other hand I have a working
IMAP server on the same machine. I want to index Date, From, To, Cc, Bcc,
Subject, Body.
How can I set up Solr to do this? Could you write a small guide to help me?
Cool!
On 2/23/11, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All, I'm happy to announce a new release of SolrMeter, an open source
stress test tool for Solr.
You can obtain the code or executable jar from the google code page at:
http://code.google.com/p/solrmeter
There have
I assume you found this?: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MailEntityProcessor
You don't provide enough information to get assistance when you simply say I
couldn't get it working.
(disclaimer: I haven't used DIH's mail feature)
~ David
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Husrev Yilmaz wrote:
Hi,
I am
The DIH is no longer supplied embedded in the Solr war file. You need to get
it on the classpath somehow. You could add another lib... statement to
solrconfig.xml to resolve this.
~ David Smiley
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:11 PM,
: fq={!field f=category}insert value, URL encoded of course, here
There are subtle nuanced cases where field won't work properly, which is
why i usually recommend raw, but there are also subtle nuanced cases
where raw won't work either (although in my opinion those cases are much
less
Curious...why was this feature removed?
Adam
On Feb 23, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
The DIH is no longer supplied embedded in the Solr war file. You need to get
it on the classpath somehow. You could add another lib... statement to
solrconfig.xml to resolve
Nice! will definitely give it a try! :)
On 23 February 2011 22:55, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool!
On 2/23/11, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All, I'm happy to announce a new release of SolrMeter, an open source
stress test tool for Solr.
You can
It is a contrib module. But the example solrconfig should have the lib set.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Estrada Groups estrada.adam.gro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Curious...why was this feature removed?
Adam
On Feb 23, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Smiley, David W.
The DIH config does not mention port numbers, or security options. I
recently wrote a custom app to download and index mail- there were
several complexities (the above problems, attachments, calculating
mail threads).
I think your best bet is to find a utility that downloads mail into
mbox files.
: Curious...why was this feature removed?
it hasn't been removed, it still ships with the solr releases as a contrib
jar the same way it always did.
what changed is that in the past it was mistakenly/foolishly/inexplicable
also included in the solr.war -- even though it didn't need to be.
I got it working by building the DIH from the contrib folder and made a
change on the lib statements to map the folder that contains the .jar files.
Thanks!
Alexandre
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
The DIH is no longer supplied embedded in the Solr
: Maybe copy fields should be refactored to happen in a new, core,
: update processor, so there is nothing special/awkward about them? It
: seems they fit as part of what an update processor is all about,
: augmenting/modifying incoming documents.
:
: Seems reasonable.
: By default, the
: I have many taxonomies and each document can apply to some of them. I dont
: know how many taxonomies they are, so i cant define a field in the schema
: for each taxonomy (one field per each taxonomy).
:
: I want to use these feature but i need to know if i can handle the context
: where each
Hi,
- Original Message
From: Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com
Subject: disable replication in a persistent way
Hello,
solr/replication?command=disablepoll disables replication on slave(s).
However
it is not persistent. After solr/tomcat restart, slave(s) will continue
I'm required to provide a handler with some specialized query string inputs.
I'd like to translate the query inputs to a lucene/solr query and delegate the
request to the existing lucene/dismax handler.
What's the best way to do this?
Do I implement SolrRequestHandler, or a QParser? Do I
Hi
It didn't search.. (means no results found even results exist) one
observation is that it works well even in the long phrases but when the long
phrases contain stop words and same stop word exist two or more time in the
phrase then, solr can't search with query parsed in this way.
On Wed,
Trying to answer my own question.. seems like it would be a good idea to create
a SearchComponent and add this to the list of existing components.
My component just converts query parameters to something that the solr
QueryComponent understands.
One good way of doing it?
On Feb 23, 2011, at
Hi
I have faced the same problem and I solved it by adding double quotes
dhanesh s.r
On 2/23/2011 7:47 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Try -
fq={!field f=category}insert value, URL encoded of course, here
You can also try surrounding with quotes, but that gets tricky and you'll need
to escape
59 matches
Mail list logo
