I'm entering only a query parameter.
I posted a bug description there - http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=22634
2011/4/8 Israel Ekpo israele...@gmail.com
Hi,
Could you send the enter list of parameters you are ending to solr via the
SolrClient and SolrQuery object?
Please open a bug
Hi All,
I was able to set the cookie value to the Stream_url connection, i was
able to pass the cookie value upto contentstreamBase.URLStream class and i
added
conn.setRequestProperty(Cookie,cookie[0].name=cookie[0].value) in the
connection setup.. and it is working fine now...
Regards,
Ephraim, I still can't view the document.
Don't know if I'm doing something wrong, but I downloaded it and It
appears to be empty.
Albert
On 7 April 2011 09:32, Ephraim Ofir ephra...@icq.com wrote:
You can't view it online, but you should be able to download it from:
On 4/7/11 10:16 PM, Mark wrote:
Andrezej,
Thanks for the info. I have a question regarding stability though. How
are you able to guarantee the stability of this release when 4.0 is
still a work in progress? I believe the last version Lucid released was
1.4 so why did you choose to release a 4.x
is it possible to use StreamingUpdateSolrServer with a php application ?
-
--- System
One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 7 Cores,
1 Core with 31 Million Documents other Cores 100.000
- Solr1 for Search-Requests -
Hi Mark,
thanks for your interest!!! That's a feature we haven't had the the
time to work on (yet ;))
As workaround, what I can suggest you is modifying the
tomcat-users.xml file inside the produced tomcat, once unzipped.
HTH, please let me know!!!
Have a nice day,
Simo
It seems that tokens are sorted by frequencies :
...
Collections.sort(profile, new TokenComparator());
...
and
private static class TokenComparator implements ComparatorToken {
public int compare(Token t1, Token t2) {
return t2.cnt - t1.cnt;
}
and cnt is the token count.
Hi.
Yes, I manage to create a stable comparator in c# for profile.
The problem is before that on:
...
tokens.put(s, tok);
...
Imagine you have 2 tokens with the same frequency, on the stable sort
comparator for profile it will maintain the original order.
The problem is that the original
Couldn't you extend the TextProfileSignature and modify the TokenComparator
class to use lexical order when token have the same frequency ?
Ludovic.
2011/4/8 Frederico Azeiteiro [via Lucene]
ml-node+2794604-1683988626-383...@n3.nabble.com
Hi.
Yes, I manage to create a stable comparator in
Yes, i guess that could be an option, but I'm not very experienced with Java
development and SOLR modifications.
As my main goal was to create a similar sig in C#, I just use the c# method to
create the sig myself before indexing instead of SOLR Deduplicate function.
That way, when searching I
Pete
Surely the default sort order for facets is by descending count order. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters. If your results are
really sorted in ascending order can't you sort them externally eg Java?
Hope that helps.
Shaun
Hi Jay,
you should be able to do so by simply removing the OpenCalaisAnnotator from
the execution pipeline commenting the line 124 of the file:
solr/contrib/uima/src/main/resources/org/apache/uima/desc/OverridingParamsExtServicesAE.xml
Hope this helps,
Tommaso
2011/4/7 Jay Luker
Hi Erick,
Thank you for the Reply.
Now I am able to index the PDF files and search.
I am left with couple of questions:
1. Can I add custom field to Search Response XML (Ex: Need to as description
which gives brief description about the PDF file).
2. Currently Solr runs as a separate
You might also want to look at the heritrix crawler too:
http://crawler.archive.org/
I have written three crawlers in the past, all for RSS feeds, it is not easy.
Happy to provide tips and help if you want to go down that route.
François
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Andrea Campi wrote:
solrj has a dependency on wstx-asl. I've successfully used Solr 1.4
maven artifacts for a while and the wstx-asl dependency had the wrong
groupId so it's always been missing in my application, but it has
still worked fine. Is wstx-asl really needed? Is it only needed in
certain circumstances? Is
Hello.
i want to change my full-imports from DIH to use of Java and
StreamingUpdateSolrServer ...
is in the wiki a little how to or something similar ?
-
--- System
One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 7 Cores,
1
I can't view the document either -- it showed up empty.
Has anyone succeeded in viewing it?
Andy
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Albert Vila a...@imente.com wrote:
From: Albert Vila a...@imente.com
Subject: Re: Very very large scale Solr Deployment = how to do (Expert
Question)?
To:
Yes, It won't work if you are using OpenOffice. However it works fine
with Microsoft Word.
Hope it helps.
Albert
On 8 April 2011 14:55, Andy angelf...@yahoo.com wrote:
I can't view the document either -- it showed up empty.
Has anyone succeeded in viewing it?
Andy
--- On Fri, 4/8/11,
I've looked at both wiki pages and none really clarify the difference
between these two. If I copy and paste an existing index value for field and
do an mlt search, it shows up under match but not results. What is the
difference between these two?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Brian Lamb
Could anyone please post a version of the document in pdf or openoffice format?
I'm on Linux so there's no way for me to use MS Word.
Thanks.
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Albert Vila a...@imente.com wrote:
From: Albert Vila a...@imente.com
Subject: Re: Very very large scale Solr Deployment = how to
I dit put a pdf version here:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=explorerchrome=truesrcid=0B02DHBZQYYT_MmRkZTY0YjQtODJmZS00Mzg0LWJiNTEtOWJjNzViNmNjZjdhhl=enauthkey=CL2Fq_QG
Zoom it to get a better view.
Pascal
2011/4/8 Andy angelf...@yahoo.com
Could anyone please post a version of the
Hello Everyone,
I am getting my integer field data from xml. Some docs fail because of a
newline character at the end of the string. I am attempting to strip spaces
and new line characters as follows:
The above still results in a numberformatexception.
Is this the right
I had some time to do some research into the problems. From what I can tell,
it appears Solr is tripping up over the filename. These are strictly examples,
but, Solr handles this filename fine:
32-130-A0-84-african_activist_archive-a0a6s3-b_12419.pdf
However, it fails with either a parsing
Perfect. Thank you very much.
Andy
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Pascal Coupet pcou...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Pascal Coupet pcou...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Very very large scale Solr Deployment = how to do (Expert
Question)?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, April 8, 2011, 10:20 AM
I
OmniTI is pleased to announce that the CFP deadline for Surge 2011, the
Scalability and Performance Conference, (Baltimore: Sept 28-30, 2011) has
been extended to 23:59:59 EDT, April 17, 2011. The event focuses upon case
studies that demonstrate successes (and failures) in Web applications and
Doesn't look like you allow new members to post questions in that forum.
I have just one last question ;)
We are deciding whether to upgrade our 1.4 production environment to 4.x
or 3.1. What were you decisions when deciding to release 4.x over 3.1?
Thanks again
On 4/8/11 1:13 AM, Andrzej
Hi,
I have to jump into this topic.
I can not find the mentioned replies, Markus but I still noticed that
problem, too.
What could be the cause?
Regards,
Em
Markus Jelsma-2 wrote:
You opened the same thread this monday and got two replies.
Hi,
Has anyone indexed the data with Trade
Maybe those files are created with a different Adobe Format version...
See this:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PDF-parser-exception-td644885.html
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Brandon Waterloo
brandon.water...@matrix.msu.edu wrote:
A second test has revealed that it is something to do
Ohh sorry... didn't realize that they already sent you that link :P
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Ezequiel Calderara ezech...@gmail.comwrote:
Maybe those files are created with a different Adobe Format version...
See this:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-data-with-Trade-Mark-Symbol-
td2774421.html
Hi,
I have to jump into this topic.
I can not find the mentioned replies, Markus but I still noticed that
problem, too.
What could be the cause?
Regards,
Em
Markus Jelsma-2 wrote:
You opened
Hi,
I have a field named productName in my schema which uses the standard
text field type. And one of my product name is star/bit. When I search
for star/bit (without quotes) using the dismax request hander, NO results
was found.
After some research, looks like during indexing, star/bit was
I think I've finally found the problem. The files that work are PDF version
1.6. The files that do NOT work are PDF version 1.4. I'll look into updating
all the old documents to PDF 1.6.
Thanks everyone!
~Brandon Waterloo
From: Ezequiel Calderara
Hi there
TikaEntityProcessor is available as part of DIH-extras*.jar in 3.x and 4.0
Hi again
what you are missing is field mapping
field column=id name=id /
no need for TikaEntityProcessor since you are not accessing pdf files
Your schema stuff didn't come through, possibly your mail server is removing
it.
But two things come to mind. First, Solr has a trimfilterfactory, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.TrimFilterFactory
Unless you need the goodies in 4.x, I'd go with 3.1, just on the
principle that 4.x is more fluid than 3.1, and I'd go with more
static code. 4.x gets whatever patches the committers decide are good
whereas 3.1 (or 3.2 if that comes out) will have a smaller set of
changes.
Both are well tested,
This works fine for me. Tack on debugQuery=on to your URL
and post that please unless the stuff below helps
But note a couple of things
1 productName isn't part of the default dismax configuration in your
solrconfig.xml file, so unless you put it there it's not being searched
on. Try putting
Thanks for the note, Shaun, but the documentation indicates that the sorting is
only in ascending order :-(
facet.sort
This param determines the ordering of the facet field constraints.
• count - sort the constraints by count (highest count first)
• index - to return the
I have tried to change to plain text format and reword my question several
times. Weird and annoying. Here is my question, maybe it'll somehow go
through
this time:
In my master/slave setup, my slaves are polling the master every minute. My
indexes are getting large, to the point where I
Is there any compatible KStemmer
(com.lucidimagination.solrworks.analysis.LucidKStemFilterFactory) or
equivalent that works well with 3.1?
If not, what would be a decent alternative?
Thanks
Hi Hoss,
I realize I'm reviving a really old thread, but I have the same need, and
SpanNumericRangeQuery sounds like a good solution for me. Can you give me
some guidance on how to implement that?
Thanks,
Wojtek
--
View this message in context:
Thanks Erick. Here is the Solr response with debug on. The productName IS in
the qf parameter in dismax. I have also pasted my dismax definition and the
text field type definition:
−
0
47
−
on
on
0
bit/star
dismax
10
2.2
−
−
bit/star
bit/star
bit/star
−
On 4/8/11 4:58 PM, Mark wrote:
Doesn't look like you allow new members to post questions in that forum.
There's a Create new account link there, you simply need to register
and log in.
I have just one last question ;)
We are deciding whether to upgrade our 1.4 production environment to
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Andrzej Bialecki a...@getopt.org wrote:
:) If you don't need the new functionality in 4.x, you don't
need the performance improvements,
What performance improvements does 4.x have over 3.1?
reindexing cycles are long (indexes tend to stay around)
then 3.1 is a safer
I'm having real trouble with the formatting. Either Google has changed or
somehow
all the markup is getting stripped on your end. Could you send as plain text
and
see if that works?
But from what I can make out, we're doing *something* different. Because I
get
parsed queries like below, and
Hi all,
We're using the solr-236 (field collapsing) patch on solr 1.4.1 and wish to
upgrade to 3.1
Has anyone applied this patch to 3.1, successfully or unsuccessfully?
[ftr, Solr 4.x includes field collapsing; 3.1 does not ]
The issue has several patch files, including some for 1.4.1
LucidKStemmer ( LucidGaze) are LGPL licensed -- I just verified this with the
NOTICE.txt in the download. I wish Lucid's site was more clear on this -- I
checked their first but found no information on the license terms.
I don't know why you want an alternative. If you insist I suppose you
On 4/8/11 9:55 PM, Andy wrote:
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Andrzej Bialeckia...@getopt.org wrote:
:) If you don't need the new functionality in 4.x, you don't
need the performance improvements,
What performance improvements does 4.x have over 3.1?
Ah... well, many - take a look at the
The query below results in an array out of bounds exception:
select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=0facet=truefacet.field=topicStr
Here is the exception:
Exception during facet.field of
topicStr:java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1931149
at
Thank you, that worked.
For the record, my objection to the OpenCalais service is that their
ToS states that they will retain a copy of the metadata submitted by
you, and that by submitting data to the service you grant Thomson
Reuters a non-exclusive perpetual, sublicensable, royalty-free
I only want an alternative if it is not compatible with 3.1.
On 4/8/11 1:26 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
LucidKStemmer ( LucidGaze) are LGPL licensed -- I just verified this with the
NOTICE.txt in the download. I wish Lucid's site was more clear on this -- I checked
their first but found no
And by alternatives I meant if it was not 3.1 compatible what are other
stemmers that behave/perform closely.
thanks
On 4/8/11 1:59 PM, Mark wrote:
I only want an alternative if it is not compatible with 3.1.
On 4/8/11 1:26 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
LucidKStemmer ( LucidGaze) are LGPL
I am using Nabble to view the thread, and the format seems to be ok:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=replynode=2796849
1 what version of Solr.
Solr 1.4
2 have you looked in your index (admin page and/or luke) to see if what you
have indexed there is what you
Sorry wrong link to the thread, here is the correct one:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Special-characters-during-indexing-and-searching-td2795914.html
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Special-characters-during-indexing-and-searching-tp2795914p2797158.html
How come this new version is bundled with rails and why is there no .war
output format?
I wanted a simple drop in replacement for my current war :(
On 4/8/11 1:27 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
On 4/8/11 9:55 PM, Andy wrote:
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Andrzej Bialeckia...@getopt.org wrote:
:) If
On Apr 8, 2011, at 17:32 , Mark wrote:
How come this new version is bundled with rails and why is there no .war
output format?
Rails, via JRuby, is used in LucidWorks Enterprise for both the admin and
search interfaces. (and also powers the Alerts REST API).
I wanted a simple drop in
I see no reason why it would not be compatible.
-
Author: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/KStemmer-for-Solr-3-x-tp2796594p2798213.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
57 matches
Mail list logo
