Hi
This happened because the there are 2 jars - apache-solr-solrj-3.3.0.jar and
apache-solr-solrj-1.3.0.jar in the Apache Solr distribution. After I removed
the apache-solr-solrj-1.3.0.jar file, the code is working fine.
Thank you for your pointers!!
Best Regards,
Tejas Bavishi
-Original
Hi, I'm using an repeater .As you know ,sometimes the repeater will get a
version from master, I wonder when this synchronize finished ,is this two
indexes have same version number ?
Any suggestions will be appreciate. Thanks so much.
Hi lucene/solr-folk,
Issue:
Our documents are stable except for two fields which are used for linking
between the docs. So we like to update this two fields in a batch once a month
(possible once a week).
We can not reindex all docs once a month, because we are using XeLDA in some
fields for
Hi g,
ok, I understand your problem, now. (Sorry for answering that late.)
I don't think PlainTextEntityProcessor can help you. It does not take a
regex. LineEntityProcessor does but your record elements probably do not
come on their own line each and you wouldn't want to depend on that,
anyway.
On 8/1/2011 6:17 AM, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
If you are looking for a config-only solution - i'm not sure that there
is one. Someone else might be able to comment on that?
You might want to take a look at SOLR-2597; it has a patch for
XmlStripCharFilter, which will strip tags from XML for
thanks for the reply. This is tomcat log files on my Solr Server:
I found that : if the server returns status=0 and QTime=0, the SolrPhpClient
will throughs an Exception. But the same query String will not always return
status=0 and QTime=0. The Query String is valid, I have tested them in Solr
Thanks for the answers!
This was the solution! :) (my fault was that I tried to use the on value
instead of true - don't know why..)
Gyuri
2011/7/30 Michael Sokolov soko...@ifactory.com
On 7/30/2011 3:46 AM, Orosz György wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the answer!
I am doing some logging about
Hi,
i need to order by function like:
sort=sum(field1,field2,field3)+desc
but solr gives me this error:
Missing sort order.
why is this possible? i read that is possible to order by function, from
version 1.3
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Sort_By_Function)
i use version 1.4
Hi Zili,
Master, Slave and Repeater all of these nodes will be at same index version
after replication. You can check it with replication?command=indexversion
command.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, ZiLi dangld...@163.com wrote:
Hi, I'm using an repeater .As you know ,sometimes the repeater
A customer has an interesting problem: some documents will have multiple
versions. In search results, only the most recent version of a given
document should be shown. The trick is that each user has access to a
different set of document versions, and each user should see only the
most recent
I've never tried but could it be sort=sum(field1,field2,field3)%20desc
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Gastone Penzo gastone.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i need to order by function like:
sort=sum(field1,field2,field3)+desc
but solr gives me this error:
Missing sort order.
why is this
Hi Michael, I guess this could be solved using grouping as you said.
Documents inside a group can be sorted on a field (in your case, the version
field, see parameter group.sort), and you can show only the first one. It
will be more complex to show facets (post grouping faceting is work in
Thanks, Tomas. Yes we are planning to keep a current flag in the most
current document. But there are cases where, for a given user, the most
current document is not that one, because they only have access to some
older documents.
I took a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
Hi Mike, how many docs and groups do you have in your index?
I think the group.sort option fits your requirements.
If I remember correctly group.ngroup=true adds something like 30% extra time
on top of the search request with grouping,
but that was on my local test dataset (~30M docs, ~8000
I think a 30% increase is acceptable. Yes, I think we'll try it.
Although our case is more like # groups ~ # documents / N, where N is a
smallish number (~1-5?). We are planning for a variety of different
index sizes, but aiming for a sweet spot around a few M docs.
-Mike
On 08/01/2011
We have around 10million documents that are in our index and about 10%
of them have some extra statistics that are calculated on a daily
basis which are then index and used in our function queries. This
reindexing comes at the expense of doing multiple joins in DIH so I am
thinking it may be
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Mark static.void@gmail.com wrote:
We have around 10million documents that are in our index and about 10% of
them have some extra statistics that are calculated on a daily basis which
are then index and used in our function queries. This reindexing comes at
Hi,
we have several entries in our database our customer would like to find when
using a not exactly matching search string. The Problem is kind of related
to spelling correction and synonyms. But instead of single entries in
synonyms.txt we would like a automatic solution for this group of
I'd try solr.PhoneticFilterFactory, it usually converts these slight
differences... schmidt, smith and schmid will be something like XMDT
2011/8/1 thomas tom.erfu...@googlemail.com
Hi,
we have several entries in our database our customer would like to find
when
using a not exactly matching
Thomas,
an alternative would be to use the Kölner phonetic factory.
A recent discussion happened about it.
But all this needs some programming.
paul
Le 1 août 2011 à 17:41, Alexei Martchenko a écrit :
I'd try solr.PhoneticFilterFactory, it usually converts these slight
differences...
Thanks Alexei,
Thanks Paul,
I played with the solr.PhoneticFilterFactory. Analysing my query in solr
admin backend showed me how and that it is working. My major problem is,
that this filter needs to be applied to the index chain as well as to the
query chain to generate matches for our search.
Any changes you make related to stemming or normalization are likely
going to require a re-index, just how it goes, just how solr/lucene
works. What you can do just by normalizing at query time is limited,
almost any good solution to this type of problem is going to require
normalization at
Le 1 août 2011 à 18:35, thomas a écrit :
Thanks Alexei,
Thanks Paul,
I played with the solr.PhoneticFilterFactory. Analysing my query in solr
admin backend showed me how and that it is working. My major problem is,
that this filter needs to be applied to the index chain as well as to the
On 8/1/2011 12:42 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Otherwise i need to backup the whole index and try to reindex
overnight when
cms users are sleeping.
With some work you can do this using an extra solr that just pulls everything,
then swaps the indexes (that needs a bit of downtime), then
Hi List
I have been using the JOIN patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272 with great success.
However I have hit a case where it doesn't seem to be working. It
doesn't seem to work when joining to a multi-valued field.
Has anyone any experience using the patch to join on
On 7/31/2011 8:18 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
the syntax isn't really the hard part. where things get tricky is in the
internals of th SolrIndexSearcher and SearchHandler so that you cache
those fqu params independently and then union the results, particularly
when those fq/fqu params need to be
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:58 PM, matthew.fow...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
I have been using the JOIN patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272 with great success.
However I have hit a case where it doesn't seem to be working. It
doesn't seem to work when joining to a multi-valued
If you want to avoid re-indexing, you could consider building a synonym
file that is generated using your rule set, and then using that to
expand your queries. You'd need to get a list of all terms in your
index and then process them to generate synyonyms. Actually, I don't
know how to get a
: thanks for the reply. This is tomcat log files on my Solr Server:
: I found that : if the server returns status=0 and QTime=0, the SolrPhpClient
: will throughs an Exception. But the same query String will not always return
: status=0 and QTime=0. The Query String is valid, I have tested them
On 8/1/2011 1:40 PM, Mike Sokolov wrote:
If you want to avoid re-indexing, you could consider building a
synonym file that is generated using your rule set, and then using
that to expand your queries. You'd need to get a list of all terms in
your index and then process them to generate
It works perfectly! Thank you so much!!!
Ruixiang
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:56 PM, tmahesh mah...@tmahesh.com wrote:
In etc/jetty.xml, at line 204, you should remove the comment (delete line
204
and line 218)
204
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I combined a spatial distance search with a fulltext search as described
in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#geodist_-_The_distance_function .
I'm using solr 3.3 and that works fine.
BUT, I want to use highlighting of fulltext query words but that does
not work.
Before solr
Can you demonstrate the bug against the example data? If so, provide the URL
please.
~ David
On Aug 1, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Ralf Musick wrote:
Hi,
I combined a spatial distance search with a fulltext search as described
in
Hi David,
an example is:
http://localhost:8983/solr/browse?indent=onhl=onhl.fl=name,manusort=score+ascsfield=storejson.nl=mapwt=jsonrows=10start=0q={!func}geodist%28%29pt=45.17614%2C-93.87341fq=%28name%20:+%28canon%29%29^8
I have to say I need the calculated distance as a return field (score)
Ralf,
Highlighting (and search relevancy -- the score) is performed on the user query
which must be in the q parameter. In your case, I see you placed your
geospatial query there and you put your user query into a filter query fq.
You have them reversed.
You stated that the returning the
Hi David,
So that As a temporary workaround for older Solr versions, it's
possible to obtain distances by using geodist or geofilt as the only
scoring part of the main query
and Highlighting do not fit together, right?
Ok, than I have to calculate the distance by my own.
Thank you very much
I'm sure someone asked this before, but I couldn't find a previous post
regarding this.
The problem:
Let's say that I have a multivalued field called myFriends that tokenizes on
whitespaces. Basically, I'm treating it like a List of Lists (attributes of
friends):
Document A:
myFriends = [
I'm looking for an ANTLR parser that consumes solr queries and filters. Before
I write my own, thought I'd ask if anyone has one they are willing to share or
can point me to one?
Thanks
Scott
I think 4.0 supports fl=geodist()
On 8/1/11 3:47 PM, Ralf Musick ra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi David,
So that As a temporary workaround for older Solr versions, it's
possible to obtain distances by using geodist or geofilt as the only
scoring part of the main query
and Highlighting do not fit
This seems like a bug.
On 8/1/11 7:47 AM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never tried but could it be sort=sum(field1,field2,field3)%20desc
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Gastone Penzo gastone.pe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
i need to order by function like:
we have a fairly complex taxonomy in our search system. I want to store the
taxonomy revision that was used to built the Solr index. This revision
number is not specific to a document but it is specific to the entire index.
I want this revision number to be returned as part of every search.
What
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:56 PM, abhayd ajdabhol...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi
I have a xml file which has url, category,subcategory, title kind of
details.
and we crawl the urls in xml using Nutch. Anyway for use to merge both?
[...]
Not sure that I follow your requirements, and it has
been
42 matches
Mail list logo
