Oh, yeah. That was the only thing I did! to make dismax default, instead of
using defType=dismax, as I used to do!
Thanks for the clarification.
Sowmya.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Rafal Piekarski ravba...@gmail.com wrote:
Check that you have used lucene query parser, not dismax or
I think this is correct behaviour. If you go to google and search for Tel,
you will see that telephone is highlighted.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ahmed Boubaker
abdeka.boubake...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am using solr 3 and highlighting is working fine. However when using
prefix query
Hi,
We have a multicore solr with 6 cores. We merge the results using shards
parameter or distrib handler.
I have a problem, I might post one document on one of the cores and then
post it after some days on another core, as I have a time-sliced multicore
setup!
The question is if I retrieve a
I would appreciate some clarifications about DIH
I do not have reliable timestamp, but I do have atomic sequence that
only grows on inserts/changes.
You can understand it as a timestamp on some funky timezone not
related to wall clock time, it is integer type.
Is DIH keeping track of the
Le 6 août 2011 à 02:09, Yonik Seeley a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
my solr is coming to slowly reach its memory limits (8Gb) and the stats
displays me a reasonable fieldCache (1800) but 4820 searchers. That sounds a
bit much to me, each
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
Le 6 août 2011 à 02:09, Yonik Seeley a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
my solr is coming to slowly reach its memory limits (8Gb) and the stats
displays me a reasonable
Le 6 août 2011 à 17:37, Yonik Seeley a écrit :
I have a custom query-handler and a custom response writer.
Do you always retrieve the searcher via
SolrQueryRequest.getSearcher()? If so, there should be no problem...
but if you call SolrCore.getSearcher(), that is where leaks can happen
if
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
Le 6 août 2011 à 17:37, Yonik Seeley a écrit :
I have a custom query-handler and a custom response writer.
Do you always retrieve the searcher via
SolrQueryRequest.getSearcher()? If so, there should be no problem...
Le 6 août 2011 à 19:52, Yonik Seeley a écrit :
I've been using the following:
rb.req.getCore().getSearcher().get().getReader()
Bingo! Code should never do core.getSearcher().get()
since core.getSearcher returns a reference that must be decremented
when you are done.
Using
This is convincing me... I'd like to experiment and close.
So, how can I be sure this is the right thing?
I would have thought adding a document and committing would have created a
Searcher in my current usage but I do not see the reference list actually being
enlarged on my development
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
This is convincing me... I'd like to experiment and close.
So, how can I be sure this is the right thing?
I would have thought adding a document and committing would have created a
Searcher in my current usage but I do
Le 6 août 2011 à 20:21, Yonik Seeley a écrit :
It is creating a new searcher, but then closing the old searcher after
all currently running requests are done using it (that's what the
reference counting is for).
After the searcher is closed, it's removed from the list.
Not if using:
On 8/6/2011 8:49 AM, eks dev wrote:
I would appreciate some clarifications about DIH
I do not have reliable timestamp, but I do have atomic sequence that
only grows on inserts/changes.
I use DIH, but I don't use the built-in timestamp facility at all. I
have an autoincrement field in a
PS: why is RefCounted not using SoftReference?? I think I would not see my bug
then.
Thanks Shawn, nice! I didn't notice you can pass more params all the
way to sql.
So you really do not care about DIH incremental facility, you use it
just as vehicle to provide
- SQL import
- transactional commit to solr on updates...
But keeping DB/solr n sync is externalized (I am trying to
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
Le 6 août 2011 à 20:21, Yonik Seeley a écrit :
It is creating a new searcher, but then closing the old searcher after
all currently running requests are done using it (that's what the
reference counting is for).
After
Le 7 août 2011 à 01:10, Yonik Seeley a écrit :
Oh, I see... you want to re-create the bug so you can see when it is fixed?
To trigger the bug, you need to hit a code path that uses the
getCore().getSearcher().get() code.
So first send a request that hits that buggy code, then add a doc and
How can I run a query to get the result count only? I only need the count
and so I dont need solr to send me all the results back.
q=*:*rows=0
On 8/6/11 8:24 PM, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com wrote:
How can I run a query to get the result count only? I only need the count
and so I dont need solr to send me all the results back.
19 matches
Mail list logo
