I think one problem is that the featurePath is not set correctly.
Note that you are assuming PoS are written somewhere in some annotation
feature so this mean you should've setup the UIMA pipeline to include also,
for example, the HMM Tagger [1] which adds (by default) the posTag feature
to
hi Hoss,
This helps.
Only thing i am not sure is use of TermsComponent. As I understand
TermsComponent allows sorking only on count|index. So I m not sure how
popularity could be used for sort or boost.
Any thoughts around using TermsComponent with popularity? If this is
possible then i dont
Hi,
I indexed my data on my 32-bit computer.Do I need to re-index if I upload my
data to a 64-bit server or does copying the data directories would suffice?
Thank you.
Hi all,
Now I'm doing research on solr distributed search, and it is said documents
more than one million is reasonable to use distributed search.
So I want to know, does anyone have the test result(Such as time cost) of using
single index and distributed search of more than one million data? I
Hi,
The no-op run completed in 20 minutes. The only commented line was
solr.addBean(doc) We've tried SUSS as a drop in replacement for
CommonsHttpSolrServer but it's behavior was weird. We have seen 10Ks of
seconds for updates and it continues for a very long time after sending to
solr is
That was kinda my point. The new cloud implementation
is not about replication, nor should it be. But rather about
horizontal scalability where nodes manage different parts
of a unified index. One of the design goals of the new cloud
implementation is for this to happen more or less
Once a given field has omitted positions in the past, even for just
one document, it sticks and that field will forever omit positions.
Try creating a new index, never omitting positions from that field?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Isan Fulia
Nope
On 9/29/2011 12:17 AM, Pulkit Singhal wrote:
Did you find out about this?
2011/8/2 Yury Kats yuryk...@yahoo.com:
I have multiple SolrCloud instances, each running its own Zookeeper
(Solr launched with -DzkRun).
I would like to create an ensemble out of them. I know about -DzkHost
On 9/29/2011 7:22 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
That was kinda my point. The new cloud implementation
is not about replication, nor should it be. But rather about
horizontal scalability where nodes manage different parts
of a unified index.
It;s about many things. You stated one, but there are
Are you changing just the host OS or the JVM, or both, from 32 bit to 64 bit?
If it is just the OS, the answer is definitely no, you don't need to do
anything more than copy.
If the answer is the JVM, I *think* the answer is still no, but others more
authoritative than I may wish to respond.
Hello,
I was taking a look to my SOLR statistics and i see in part of the
requesthandler a count of 23 by errors. How can i see which requests returns
this errors? Can i log this somewhere?
Thanks
Roy
--
View this message in context:
I think your problem is that you've set
omitTermFreqAndPositions=true
It's not real clear from the Wiki page, but
the tricky little phrase
Queries that rely on position that are issued
on a field with this option will silently fail to
find documents.
And phrase queries rely on position
I am no expert, but here is my take and our situation.
Firstly, are you asking what the minimum number of documents is before it makes
*any* sense at all to use a distributed search, or are you asking what the
maximum number of documents is before a distributed search is essentially
required?
That's normally what you want to do - setup a separate quorum for production.
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:36 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
I'm not a solrcloud guru, but why not start your zookeeper quorum separately?
I also believe that you can specify a zoo.cfg file which will create a
zk quorum from
Specific replies below, but what I'd seriously consider
is writing my own filesystem-aware hook that pushed
documents to known Solr servers rather than using
DIH to pull them. You could use the code from
FileSystemEntityProcessor as a base and go from there.
The FileSystemEntityProcessor isn't
I am not expert, but based on my experience, the information you are looking
for should indeed be in your logs.
There are at least three logs you might look for / at:
- An HTTP request log
- The solr log
- Logging by the application server / JVM
Some information is available at
Hmmm, if treating them as stopwords, wouldn't
you have to list all the possible variants? E.g.
mystuff.msn.com
yourstuff.msn.com
etc? Is that sufficient or do you want
*.msn.com (which isn't legal in a stopword
file as far as I know)?
Best
Erick
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Otis
Hi all,
I have already read the topics in the mailing list that are regarding
spatial search, but I haven't found an answer ...
I have to index a multivalued field of type : geohash via solrj.
Now I build a string with the lat and lon comma separated ( like
54.569468,67.58494 ) and index it in
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
I have some logging by jetty. Every request looks like this:
record
date2011-09-29T12:28:47/date
millis1317292127479/millis
sequence18470/sequence
loggerorg.apache.solr.core.SolrCore/logger
levelINFO/level
classorg.apache.solr.core.SolrCore/class
If you are asking how to tell which of 94000 records failed in a SINGLE HTTP
update request, I have no idea, but I suspect that you cannot necessarily tell.
It might help if you copied and pasted what you find in the solr log for the
failure (see my previous response for how to figure out where
They should be outlined in
CHANGES.txt if there are any. But usually
changes to minor versions don't require any
special steps...
Best
Erick
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Rohit ro...@in-rev.com wrote:
I have been using solr 3.1 am planning to update to solr 3.4, whats the
steps to be
I know I've seen other anomalies with odd characters
in field names. In general, it's much safer to use
only letters, numbers, and underscores. In fact, I
even prefer lowercase letters. Since you're pretty
sure those work, why not just use them?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Luis
Hi all,
I have installed solr on oc4j. but when i try to access the admin page it
throws a 'StackOverflowError'
Sep 28, 2011 3:35:25 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: java.lang.StackOverflowError
is there something i am doing wrong ? any tweak or config that i need to
change ?
Just to explain a bit more,
OC4J standalone version is 10.1.3.5.0 and Solr version is 3.4.0.
Any help will be greatly appreciated guys :)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Raja Ghulam Rasool the.r...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I have installed solr on oc4j. but when i try to access the admin
Biggest red flag is KeywordTokenizerFactory. You don't
say whether your input is multi-word or not, but
that tokenizer does NOT break up input, so
even the input my watche would not trigger a
synonym substitution. Try something like
WhitespaceTokenizer.
Second red flag. Changing your analysis
Hi Alessandro.
I can't think of any good reason anyone would use the geohash field type that
is a part of Solr today. If you are shocked I would say that, keep in mind the
work I've done with geohashes is an extension of what's in Solr, it's not
what's in Solr today. Recently I ported
Agree. Thanks also for clarifying. It helps.
On 09/29/2011 08:50 AM, Yury Kats wrote:
On 9/29/2011 7:22 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
That was kinda my point. The new cloud implementation
is not about replication, nor should it be. But rather about
horizontal scalability where nodes manage
2011/9/29 Yury Kats yuryk...@yahoo.com:
True, but there is a big gap between goals and current state.
Right now, there is distributed search, but not distributed indexing
or auto-sharding, or auto-replication. So if you want to use the SolrCloud
now (as many of us do), you need do a number of
Hi,
On 09/29/2011 03:10 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
I know I've seen other anomalies with odd characters
in field names. In general, it's much safer to use
only letters, numbers, and underscores. In fact, I
even prefer lowercase letters. Since you're pretty
sure those work, why not just use
On 9/29/2011 7:42 AM, roySolr wrote:
I have some logging by jetty. Every request looks like this:
record
date2011-09-29T12:28:47/date
millis1317292127479/millis
sequence18470/sequence
loggerorg.apache.solr.core.SolrCore/logger
levelINFO/level
The following query is failing:
((Google +))
This is ultimately reduced to 'google' by my analysis chain, but the
following is in my log (3.2.0, but 3.4.0 also fails):
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot parse '( (Google
+))':
Good day,
I'm checking if Solr would work for indexing PDFs. My requirements are:
1) I must know which page has what contents.
2) Left to right search support. Such as Hebrew. This has been the most
trickiest to achieve.
I also prefer to know the position of the searched contents on the page
Just a fact of life with the Lucene query parser. You'll need to escape the +
with a backslash for this to work.
Erik
On Sep 29, 2011, at 12:31 , Shawn Heisey wrote:
The following query is failing:
((Google +))
This is ultimately reduced to 'google' by my analysis chain, but
On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Joshua Miller wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT wrote:
cores adminPath=/admij/cores
Was that a cut and paste? If so, the /admij/cores is presumably incorrect,
and ought to be /admin/cores
No, that was a typo -- the config file
Hi all,
I am newbee in Solr. I have my application on Hbase and Hadoop and I want to
provide search functionality using Solr. I read
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler and got to know that there is
support for SQL database.
My question is :
Is Solr is also good for NoSQL like
Hi Pengkai,
my experience is based on http://www.findfiles.net/ which holds 700 Mio
documents, each about 2kb size.
A single Index containing that kind of data should hold below 80 Mio
documents. In case you have complex queries with lots of facets,
sorting, function queries then even 50
I am trying to automate the startup/shutdown of SolrCloud shards and
have noticed that there is a bit of a timing issue where if the server
which is to bootstrap ZK with the configs does not complete it's
process (i.e. there is no data at the Conf yet) the other servers will
fail to start. An
Try lilyproject.com I think they do exactly what you are asking for.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Stuti Awasthi stutiawas...@hcl.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am newbee in Solr. I have my application on Hbase and Hadoop and I want to
provide search functionality using Solr. I
http://www.lilyproject.org
2011/9/29 pulkitsing...@gmail.com
Try lilyproject.com I think they do exactly what you are asking for.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Stuti Awasthi stutiawas...@hcl.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am newbee in Solr. I have my application on Hbase and
Sorry David, probably I misunderstood your reply, what do you mean?
I'm using Lucid Work Enterprise 1.8, and, as I know , it includes geohashes
patch.
I have to index a multivalued location field and I have to make location
queries on it!
So I figured to use the geohash type ...
Any hint about
On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
Sorry David, probably I misunderstood your reply, what do you mean?
I'm using Lucid Work Enterprise 1.8, and, as I know , it includes geohashes
patch.
Solr 3x, trunk, and I suspect Lucid Works Enterprise 2.0 (doubtful 1.8))
supports
Hi,
I've been experimenting with Solr dynamic fields. Here is what I've
gathered based on my research.
For instance, I have a setup where I am catching undefined custom fields
this way. I am using (trie) types by the way.
dynamicField name=int* type=tint indexed=true stored=true
I implemented a similar feature for a categorization suggestion service. I
did the faceting in the client code, which is not exactly the best
performing but it worked very well.
It would be nice to have the Solr server do the faceting for performance.
Burton-West, Tom wrote:
If relevance
hi
i m using solr from trunk 4.0
Also dismax is set as default qt with
str name=qf
text^2.5 features^1.1 displayName^15.0 mfg^4.0 description^3.0
/str
myquery is
=
q=+ab sx+OR+(mfg:abc+OR+sx)+OR+(displayName:abc+OR+sx)qt=dismax
It is not working as per my
Well, you have to tell us what you expected and what
you're seeing. Including the output with debugQuery=on
and telling us what you disagree with would be the best
way.
You might also include your definition from your solrconfig
file. You included a fragment of it, but other parts may
have
Is there a efficient way to handle my case?
Each document has several group fields, some of them are updated
frequently, some of them are updated infrequently. Is it possible to
maintain index based on groups but can search over all of them as ONE
index?
To some extent, it is a three layer of
you cann't use this kind of query syntax against dismax query parser.
your query can by understood by standard query parser or edismax query
parser. qt request parameter is used by solr to select the request
handler plugin, not query parser.
keep in mind that different query parser can understand
Can dismax understand that query in a translated form?
在 Sep 29, 2011 10:01 PM 時，yingshou guo guoyings...@gmail.com 寫到：
you cann't use this kind of query syntax against dismax query parser.
your query can by understood by standard query parser or edismax query
parser. qt request parameter is
I don't understand what do you mean by a translated form. The only
special symbols that dismax query parser can understand is +-, eg
phrase, mandatory and prohibitory semantic, something like: term1
term2 +term3 -term4. Dismax parser will take the other operators as
query string.
I guess when you
anyone?
How to sort for termscomponent?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/autosuggest-combination-of-data-from-documents-and-popular-queries-tp3360657p3381201.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
Now I'm doing research on solr distributed search, and it
is said documents more than one million is reasonable to use
distributed search.
So I want to know, does anyone have the test
result(Such as time cost) of using single index and distributed search
of more than one million data?
hi
建议你自己搭个环境测试一下吧，1M这点儿数据一点儿问题没有
2011/9/30 秦鹏凯 qinpeng...@yahoo.cn:
Hi all,
Now I'm doing research on solr distributed search, and it
is said documents more than one million is reasonable to use
distributed search.
So I want to know, does anyone have the test
result(Such as time cost)
52 matches
Mail list logo
