Hi
I have 3 solr3.4.0 indexes i want to merge them, after searching on web i found
that there are two ways to do it as
1. Using Lucene Merge tool.
2. Merging through core admin
i am using the 1st method for this i have downloaded lucene 3.4.0 and unpack it
and then run following command on
Ok this is a good news !
I will integrate the jar and test the feature :)
Only one question regarding the indexing process in solrj.
We could index the location data in format : lat,lon in the geohash field?
Or we must encode lan lon in the geohash string and then index the encoded
string?
Thank
in my application i need to
implement search functionality with
included special characters
ex1:if i enter search term as (PAGE) i am getting
results, if i enter
search term as () i am getting error .
ex2: eventhough if i enter {,},@,$,%.i need
to get search
results those
Hi there
We are currently upgrading from solr 1.4 to 3.4 and have seen some issues
with our specific use-case.
As background we drop the whole index and then add all our documents in one
big build before we commit and then optimise.
This way we can revert the build if there are any issues and
Hi List,
We have our production search infrastructure as - 1 indexing master, 2
serving identical twin slaves. They are all Solr 1.4 beasts. Apart from this
we have 1 beast on Solr 3.4, which we have benchmarked against our
production setup (against performance and relevancy) and would like to
hi,
can anyone help me this problem? I'm using tika to index data from rich
documents and index by http request. I queried from database to get fields
and then combined with Tika. everything is ok, but i face to face with this
error FileNotFoundException. I known this error, but I want skip
I write a simple program with solrj that index files but after a minute
passed it crashed and the
*java.lang.OutOfmemoryError : java heap space* appear
I used Eclipse and my memory storage is abou 2GB and i set the
-Xms1024M-Xmx2048M for both my VM arg of tomcat and my application in Debug
yaa iorixxx...i found that lucene qury parser class
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/queryParser/QueryParser.html
here
can u pls explain that how i have to use this class in my solr config
files
i already added the following classes in my schema.xml file
filter
Any idea ?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Lord Khan Han khanuniver...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
The no-op run completed in 20 minutes. The only commented line was
solr.addBean(doc) We've tried SUSS as a drop in replacement for
CommonsHttpSolrServer but it's behavior was weird. We have seen 10Ks
I'm in the need of skipping some query analysis steps for some
queries. Or more precisely, make it switchable with a query
parameter.
Use case:
fieldType name=text_spec class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true
analyzer type=index
charFilter
Just to clarify, I'm not worried about the virtual memory getting bigger,
the issue is that after doing a lot of adds without a commit the performance
dramatically decreases until we do the commit.
This didn't use to be a problem with 1.4
Willem
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Willem Basson
We can post the documents from command line by running the post.jar file and
giving the list of files *.xml to the solr to index the document.Here we are
posting the document xml documents which has some unique format i would like
to know what are the advantages that i get from this format?
adddoc
On Sep 30, 2011, at 4:14 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
Ok this is a good news !
I will integrate the jar and test the feature :)
Only one question regarding the indexing process in solrj.
We could index the location data in format : lat,lon in the geohash field?
Or we must encode lan lon
yaa iorixxx...i found that lucene
qury parser class
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/queryParser/QueryParser.html
here
can u pls explain that how i have to use this class in my
solr config
files
i already added the following classes in my schema.xml
file
Well, the Solr XML format is the only format which Solr's XML Update handler
knows about, and it's been baked into Solr from the beginning. That said,
there is now an XSLTUpdateRequesthhandler in trunk and 3.4, which allows the
specification of an XSLT transform to convert an arbitrary XML schema
More fields will cause some increase in memory use, but it's hard to
quantify it, and it will also depend on how much usage the queries can make
of Solr's caches, number of simultaneous queries. In general, the number of
query fields has more impact on performance.
A potentially big memory sink,
I'm testing out the join functionality on the svn revision 1175424.
I've found when I add a single filter query to a join it works fine, but
when I do more then 1 filter query, the query does not return results.
This single function query with a join returns results:
can anyone help me this problem? I'm using tika to index
data from rich
documents and index by http request. I queried from
database to get fields
and then combined with Tika. everything is ok, but i face
to face with this
error FileNotFoundException. I known this error, but I
want skip
SOLR-2355 is definitely a step in the right direction but something I
would like to get clarified:
a) There were some fixes to it that went on the 3.4 3.5 branch based
on the comments section ... are they not available or not needed on
4.x trunk?
b) Does this basic implementation distribute
BTW I update the wiki with the following, hope it keeps it simpel for
others starting out:
Example B: Simple two shard cluster with shard replicas
Note: This setup leverages copy/paste to setup 2 cores per shard and
distributed searches validate a succesful completion of this
example/exercise.
My colleague and I thought the same thing - that this is an O/S
configuration issue.
/proc/sys/vm/max_map_count = 65536
I honestly don't know how many segments were in the index. Our merge factor
is 10 and there were around 4.4 million docs indexed. The OOME was raised
when the MMapDirectory was
Thanks Pulkit!
I'd actually been meaning to add the post.jar commands needed to index a doc to
each shard to the wiki. Waiting till I streamline a few things though.
- Mark
On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Pulkit Singhal wrote:
BTW I update the wiki with the following, hope it keeps it simpel
Hi Ahson,
The wiki page you got your cmdline invocation from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MergingSolrIndexes was missing a space character
between the classpath and org/apache/lucene/misc/IndexMergeTool. I've just
updated that page.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ahson Iqbal
On 9/30/2011 12:26 PM, Pulkit Singhal wrote:
SOLR-2355 is definitely a step in the right direction but something I
would like to get clarified:
Questions about SOLR-2355 are best asked in SOLR-2355 :)
b) Does this basic implementation distribute across shards or across
cores?
From a brief
I just read this response, sorry.
I think this is not possible OOTB
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:30 PM, jame vaalet jamevaa...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks tomas ..
can we set querywindowsize of particular query through url ?
say, i want only a particular set of query's result to be cached and not
Hi,
I¹m using threads with JdbcDataStore and CachedSqlEntityProcessor.
I noticed that if I make it single threaded CachedSqlEntityProcessor behaves
as expected (it only queries the db once and caches all the rows). If I make
it multi threaded it seems to make multiple db queries and when I debug
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:59 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
I am trying to automate the startup/shutdown of SolrCloud shards and
have noticed that there is a bit of a timing issue where if the server
which is to bootstrap ZK with the configs does not complete it's
process (i.e. there is no data at the
I working with a transactional system with RDBMS. We have approximately 200
db transaction per minute at peak usage. I am planning to use Solr for
indexing various part of data. I wanted to keep Solr indexes as up to date
as possible, so the the search result returned to user are as fresh and
It's best run the data import once per minute. Solr updates works best when
updates are batched and commits are infrequent.
Doing a post per document as a transaction would require a solr commit,
which could cause the server to hang under update load. Of course you could
not do the commit but
Hi Lan,
I figured out how to do this in a kludgey way on the client side but it seems
this could be implemented much more efficiently at the Solr/Lucene level. I
described my kludge and posted a question about this to the dev list, but so
far have not received any replies
: Noble? Shalin? what's the point of throwing away a connection that's been
: in use for more then 10 seconds?
: Hoss, as others have noted, DIH throws away connections which have been idle
: for more than the timeout value (10 seconds). The jdbc standard way of
: checking for a valid
This issue disappeared when we reduced the number of documents which were
being returned from Solr.
Looks to be some issue with Tomcat or Solr, returning truncated responses.
-Saroj
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:21 AM, pulkitsing...@gmail.com wrote:
If I had to give a gentle nudge, I would ask
: I figured out how to do this in a kludgey way on the client side but it
: seems this could be implemented much more efficiently at the Solr/Lucene
: level. I described my kludge and posted a question about this to the
It can, and I have -- but only for the case of a single node...
In
a) It depends entirely on what QueryParser you are using.
If your input is from a human i would suggest using dismax or edismax
and not escaping anything - unless you get some type of error, and then
maybe give the user a there was a problem with your query, would you like
to try where
: Another, faulty, option would be to model opening/closing hours in 2
: multivalued date-fields, i.e: open, close. and insert open/close for each
: day, e.g:
:
: open: 2011-11-08:1800 - close: 2011-11-09:0300
: open: 2011-11-09:1700 - close: 2011-11-10:0500
: open: 2011-11-10:1700 - close:
: I have a use case where I would like to search across two fields but I do not
: want to weight a document that has a match in both fields higher than a
: document that has a match in only 1 field.
use dismax, set the tie param to 0.0 (so it's a true max with no
score boost for matching in
hi
i have a document like this
video_id,keyword:seq
for example
1,service:2 support:1
2,support:2
3,service:2
4,service:1
What i want is a query will send video_id and in response i want to see
video with that video_id and all other related videos with keyword in sorted
order by seq
say query is
37 matches
Mail list logo
