i wonder how do you manage 200 instances
On 20 Oct 2011, at 09:21, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes 200 Individual Solr Instances not solr cores.
We get an avg response time of below 1 sec.
The number of documents is not many most of the isntances ,some of
the
instnaces have
Hi,
I'm still fairly new to solr, so please bear with me.
I'm having an amount of difficulty doing a search inside an update request
processor (as in, solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessorChain ) that I'm
trying to write. As far as I can see there's two main options, each of which is
It's certainly possible to develop a Solr admin (or search) UI using Spring
MVC. But we won't be adding any Spring MVC to Solr itself; I'm not sure if you
are proposing that Solr refactor the UI with that technology or not.
Erik
On Oct 20, 2011, at 06:26 , nagarjuna wrote:
Thank u
Thank you Otis for the answer.
I've played around with the solr admin query interface and I've managed
to confuse myself even more.
If I query without the quotes solr seems to form two parsedqueries
+((DisjunctionMaxQuery(( -first word stuff- )) DisjunctionMaxQuery((
-second word stuff- ))
Hi there,
There are many English soundex implementation can be referenced, but I
wonder how to do Chinese soundex(sounds like) filter (maybe).
any idea?
Floyd
Hi all
I am using Solr 3.4 on Windows 7.
Here is the example of a multivalue field:
doc
arr name=field_name
str387/str
str386/str
/arr
/doc
doc
arr name= field_name
str387/str
str386/str
/arr
/doc
doc
arr name= field_name
str387/str
str386/str
str385/str
I am using solr 3.4.0 with spellcheck component.
When I try and search for pre built spelling dictionary for a given
mispelt word , it only works
if I specify BOTH the q and spellcheck.q parameters. If I miss out the q
parameter I get a NullPointerException
error. I believe I have seen reference
-field_name:[ * TO 384] +field_name:[385 TO 386] -field_name:[387 TO *]
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Ellery Leung elleryle...@be-o.com wrote:
Hi all
I am using Solr 3.4 on Windows 7.
Here is the example of a multivalue field:
doc
arr name=field_name
str387/str
str386/str
Hi,
Wow, interesting question. Can soundex even be applied to a language like
Chinese, which is tonal and doesn't have individual letters, but whole
characters? I'm no expert, but intuitively speaking it sounds hard or maybe
even impossible...
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/
its seem that the problem is QParserPlugin2 class
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2011/10/20 karan.jindal1...@rediffmail.com
hi,
while to create customized query parser plugin
Thank you very much for your help!
Follow up question: what if it is a string instead of number? While you can
use [387 TO *] to find out all number that is bigger than 387, how do you
find specific set of string?
Thank you again for any help here.
-Original Message-
From: dan sutton
Wow, interesting question. Can soundex even be applied to a language like
Chinese, which is tonal and doesn't have individual letters, but whole
characters? I'm no expert, but intuitively speaking it sounds hard or maybe
even impossible...
The only two cases I can think of are:
-
Wouldn't the conversion to a western writing followed by Soundex or Metaphone
be the right thing to try?
I thought such conversions were mainstream.
paul
Le 20 oct. 2011 à 12:16, Otis Gospodnetic a écrit :
Hi,
Wow, interesting question. Can soundex even be applied to a language like
Hi Ken,
Indeed, I want to support function like phonetic (pinyin or zhuyin)
search, not soundex (sorry and thanks correct me).
any further idea?
Floyd
2011/10/20 Ken Krugler kkrugler_li...@transpac.com:
Wow, interesting question. Can soundex even be applied to a language like
Chinese,
It certainly is possible to develop search pages, update pages, etc. in any
architecture you like: I think I'd suggest looking at SolrJ if you want to do
that.http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj
PLEASE: Go read through the documentation and tutorial and browse thru the
Wiki and FAQ. It's
Well, since the OS RAM includes the JVM RAM, that is part of your requirement,
yes? Aside from the JVM and normal OS requirements, all you need OS RAM for is
file caching. Thus, for updates, the OS RAM is not a major factor. For
searches, you want sufficient OS RAM to cache enough of the
I wonder. What if, instead of 200 instances, you had one instance, but built a
uniqueKey up out of whatever you have now plus whatever information currently
segregates the instances. Then this would be much more manageable.
In other words, what is different about each of the 200 instances?
I'm still fairly new to solr, so please bear with me.
I'm having an amount of difficulty doing a search inside an
update request processor (as in,
solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessorChain ) that I'm
trying to write. As far as I can see there's two main
options, each of which is
Which one is better performance of setting inOrder=false in solrconfig.xml
and quering with A B~1 AND B A~1 if performance differences?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3437701.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Hello folks,
i have big problems with InvalidTokenOffsetExceptions with highlighting.
Looks like a bug in HTMLStripCharFilter.
H.Wang added a patch in LUCENE-2208, but nobody have time to look at this.
Could someone of the committers please take a look at this patch and commit
it or is this
Hi James,
sorry for the noise but I am not able to using the approach described,
I'm sure I'm misconfiguring something.
Basically, I have 2 fields, `abstract` and `subject`, and a field
`master-dictionary` where the first to have ben copied.
Then, in solrconfig.xml I configured the
All,
We are attempting to convert a fairly large relational database into Solr
index(es).
There are ~100,000 products with ~1,000,000 accessories that can be related to
any number of the products. So if I include the search terms and the
relationships in the same index, we're looking at a
Here's approximately how I've got it set up to do essentially the same thing,
in one of our production indexes:
---
schema.xml has:
fieldType name=text_spelling class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
{ whitespaceanalyzer, stopwordfilter, wordfelimiterfilter, lowercasefilter ...
I would not recommend removing your relational database altogether. You should
treat that as your system of record. By replacing it, you are forcing Solr to
store the unmodified value for everything even when not needed. You also lose
normalization. And if you ever need to add some data to
I'm trying to write and use a custom filter for Solr. I've got a filter
factory in myorg/solr/analysis/TestThingFilterFactory.java:
package myorg.solr.analysis;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.TokenStream;
import org.apache.solr.analysis.BaseTokenFilterFactory;
import
On 10/19/2011 5:15 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi Otis,
Yeah, I saw page, but it says for merging cores, which I presume
must reside locally to the solr instance doing the merging?
What I'm interested in doing is merging across solr instances running on
different machines into a single
Agreed, this will just be a read only view of the existing database for search
purposes. Sorry for the confusion.
From: Brandon Ramirez [brandon_rami...@elementk.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 10:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE:
Hi,
I am trying to use the analysis request handler in php / curl and was
wondering if anyone could help point me in the right direction.
I would like to mimic this command-line example from the wiki but need
to do it with a variable instead of with a file on the filesystem.
curl
Hi,
I am trying to evaluate distributed search for my project by splitting up
our single index on 2 shards with Solr 3.1
When I query the first solr server by passing the shards parameter, I get
correct search results from both shards.
(
I figured it out by passing this as the curl post fields
$postContent=array('wt'='json', 'indent'='true', 'stream.body'= $xmldoc);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, $postContent);
On 10/20/11 8:15 AM, dan whelan wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use the analysis request handler in php / curl
On 10/20/2011 9:33 AM, Rahul Warawdekar wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to evaluate distributed search for my project by splitting up
our single index on 2 shards with Solr 3.1
When I query the first solr server by passing the shards parameter, I get
correct search results from both shards.
(
On 10/20/2011 11:33 AM, Rahul Warawdekar wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to evaluate distributed search for my project by splitting up
our single index on 2 shards with Solr 3.1
When I query the first solr server by passing the shards parameter, I get
correct search results from both shards.
(
If your documents are products, then 100,000 documents is a pretty small
index for solr. Do you know approximately how many accessories are related to
each product on average? If # if relatively small (around 100 or less), then
it should be ok to create product documents with all the related
Interesting Yury. Thanks.
On 10/20/2011 11:00 AM, Yury Kats wrote:
On 10/19/2011 5:15 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi Otis,
Yeah, I saw page, but it says for merging cores, which I presume
must reside locally to the solr instance doing the merging?
What I'm interested in doing is merging
I've got two build systems for my Solr index that I wrote. The first
one is in Perl and uses GET/POST requests via HTTP, the second is in
Java using SolrJ. I've noticed a performance discrepancy when
processing every one of my delete records, currently about 25000 of
them. It takes about 5
Actually, that's the root of my concern. It looks like it product will average
~20,000 associated accessories, still workable, but starting to look painful.
Coming back the other way, I would guess each accessory would be associated
with 100 products on average.
Given that there would be
Mark,
The bug you describe looks the same as SOLR-2726
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2726) which doesn't seem to be part
of 3.4. You might want to try applying the patch, or better yet, just use a
fresh check-out on the 3.x branch as the current state (for un-released 3.5)
I'm using the http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThisHandler
MoreLikeThisHandler to find similar documents. It doesn't immediately
appear that there is any way to tweak the relevance for the similar results.
By default, it sorts those by how *similar* they are to the original
document. However,
I am surprised by the results I am getting from a search in a Solr 3.4
index.
My schema has a multivalued field of type 'string' :
field name=qua_code type=string multiValued=true indexed=true
stored=true/
The field values are 7-digit or 9-digit integer numbers; this corresponds to
a hierarchy.
Hi, I'm new to Solr and trying to get it to index PDFs. Having trouble getting
started. Following examples in ExtractingRequestHandler wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler.
Got Solr running and it indexes html, xml txt files just fine...but when I
try to feed it a .pdf
Hi,
A Solr search for request gives me hits on documents containing
requests, requesting, and requester. How can I turn this feature off
so Solr will return only those documents containing request?
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew,
What you see is the result of stemming. In Solr, certain types of fields get
stemmed (e.g. text), while some do not (e.g. string, which doesn't even get
analyzed).
To turn off stemming, create a new field type in schema.xml and make sure not
to specify any sort of stemming factory in
Hi Jonathan,
Not sure which version of Solr you are using, but look into Join functionality
- hit #1: http://search-lucene.com/?q=joinfc_project=Solr
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
I have about 20k text files, some very small, but some up to 300MB, and would
like to do text searching with highlighting.
Imagine the text is the contents of your syslog.
I would like to type in some terms, such as error and mail, and have Solr
return the syslog lines with those terms PLUS
I have highlighting on in query. If I do a search for Apple, it will
highlight Appl. If I do a search for deleted it will highlight delet,
agreed will highlight agre. How can I get it to highlight the full term
that I'm searching for and not leave off certain letters?
I'm pretty new to Solr,
Thanks that helps.
Regards
Sujatha
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT jay.jae...@dot.wi.govwrote:
Well, since the OS RAM includes the JVM RAM, that is part of your
requirement, yes? Aside from the JVM and normal OS requirements, all you
need OS RAM for is file caching.
Yes its same ,we have a base static schema and wherever required we
use dynamic.
Regards,
Sujatha
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT jay.jae...@dot.wi.govwrote:
I wonder. What if, instead of 200 instances, you had one instance, but
built a uniqueKey up out of whatever you
Just one more thing ,when we are talking about Optimization , we
are referring to HD free space for replicating the index (2 or 3 times
the index size ) .what is role of RAM (OS) here?
Regards
Suajtha
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Sujatha Arun suja.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks that
if solr support hierarchical synonym
for example:
animal-
dog
cat
bird
use animal as query term and the result set should be contains
animal,dog,cat,bird
use dog as query term and the result set should be only contains dog rather
than other words
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
Does anybody know how to implement this idea in SOLR. Please kindly
point me a direction.
For example, when user enter a keyword in Chinese 貝多芬 (this is
Beethoven in Chinese)
but key in a wrong combination of characters 背多分 (this is
pronouncation the same with previous keyword 貝多芬).
There in
50 matches
Mail list logo
