The circumstance I've most typically seen the index. show up is when
an update is sent to a slave server. The replication then appears to preserve
the updated slave index in a separate folder while still respecting the correct
data from the master.
On Sep 5, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Shawn Heisey w
On 9/5/2013 6:48 PM, Aditya Sakhuja wrote:
> I am running solr 4.1 for now, and am confused about the structure and
> naming of the contents of the data dir. I do not see the index.properties
> being generated on a fresh solr node start either.
>
> Can someone clarify when should one expect to see
Nope. You can do this if you've stored _all_ the fields (with the exception
of
_version_ and the destinations of copyField directives). But there's no way
I
know of to do what you want if you haven't.
If you have, you'd be essentially spinning through all your docs and
re-indexing
just the fields
Hello,
I am running solr 4.1 for now, and am confused about the structure and
naming of the contents of the data dir. I do not see the index.properties
being generated on a fresh solr node start either.
Can someone clarify when should one expect to see
data/index vs. data/index., and the index.p
Hello,
I was looking for a good backup / recovery solution for the solrcloud
indexes. I am more looking for restoring the indexes from the index
snapshot, which can be taken using the replicationHandler's backup command.
I am looking for something that works with solrcloud 4.3 eventually, but
sti
: yes sir i did restart the tomcat.
When you look at the Schema Browser for your default solr core (i'm
guessing it's collection1?), does it list ignored_* as a dynamic field?
does this URL below show you that "ignored_*" is using type "ignored" ?
...
http://localhost:8983/solr/#/collection1
Update: It is a bit too soon to tell, but about 6 hours into testing there
are no crashes with this patch. :)
We are pushing 500 batches of 10 updates per second to a 3 node, 3 shard
cluster I mentioned above. 5000 updates per second total.
More tomorrow after a 24 hr soak!
Tim
On Wednesday, 4
: I currently have Solr 4.3 set up with about 400 cores set to load upon
: start up. When starting Solr with an empty index for each core, Solr is
: able to load all of the cores and start up normally as expected.
: However, after running a dataimport on all cores and restarting Solr, it
: h
Hello,
I'm trying to find out how Solr runs a query for "*foo*". Google tells me that
you need to use NGramFilterFactory for that kind of substring search, but I
find that even with very simple fieldTypes, it just works. (Perhaps because
I'm testing on very small data sets, Solr is willing to
Is it possible to configure solr cell to only extract and store the body of
a document when indexing? I'm currently doing the following which I
thought would work
ModifiableSolrParams params = new ModifiableSolrParams();
params.set("defaultField", "content");
params.set("xpath", "/xhtml:html/
Hello list,
A student of a friend of mine made his masters on that topic, especially about
federated ranking.
I have copied his text here:
http://direct.hoplahup.net/tmp/FederatedRanking-Koblischke-2009.pdf
Feel free to contact me to contact Robert Koblischke for questions.
Pa
On 9/5/2013 10:03 AM, Andreas Owen wrote:
> i would like to filter / replace a word during indexing but it doesn't do
> anything and i dont get a error.
>
> in schema.xml i have the following:
>
> multiValued="true"/>
>
>
>
>
> pattern="Zahlungsverkehr" replacement="A
And show us an input string and a query that fail.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 2:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: charfilter doesn't do anything
On 9/5/2013 10:03 AM, Andreas Owen wrote:
i would like to f
Peter:
I don't quite get this. Formatting to display is trivial as it's
usually done for just a few docs anyway. You could also
just store the original unaltered value and add an additional
"normalized" field.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:02 PM, PETER LENAHAN wrote:
> Chris Hostetter
using solr 4.4 , i used collection admin to create a collection 4shards
replication - factor of 1
i did this so i could index my data, then bring in replicas later by adding
cores via coreadmin
i added a new core via coreadmin, what i noticed shortly after adding the
core, the leader of the
Hi,
I'm having a problem when solr indexes.
It is updating documents already indexed. Is this a normal behavior?
If a document with the same key already exists is it supposed to be updated?
I has thinking that is supposed to just update if the information on the
rss has changed.
Appreciate your h
Is there a way to get the count of buckets (ie unique values) for a field
facet? the rudimentary approach of course is to get back all buckets, but
in some cases this is a huge amount of data.
thanks,
steve
I currently have multiple spellchecks configured in my solrconfig.xml to
handle a variety of different spell suggestions in different languages.
In the snippet below, I have a catch-all spellcheck as well as an
English only one for more accurate matching (I.e. my schema.xml is set
up to captur
Hello,
I currently have Solr 4.3 set up with about 400 cores set to load upon start
up. When starting Solr with an empty index for each core, Solr is able to load
all of the cores and start up normally as expected. However, after running a
dataimport on all cores and restarting Solr, it hangs
i would like to filter / replace a word during indexing but it doesn't do
anything and i dont get a error.
in schema.xml i have the following:
my 2. question is where can i say that the expression is multilined like in
javascript i can
Ya, looks like this is a bug in Datastax Enterprise 3.1.2. I'm using
their enterprise cluster search product which is built on SOLR 4.
:(
On 9/5/13 11:24 AM, "Jack Krupansky" wrote:
>I just tried commitWithin with the standard Solr example in Solr 4.4 and
>it works fine.
>
>Can you reproduce
They have modified the mechanisms for committing documents…Solr in DSE is not
stock Solr...so you are likely encountering a boundary where stock Solr
behavior is not fully supported.
I would definitely reach out to them to find out if they support the request.
On Sep 5, 2013, at 8:27 AM, "Ryan,
I just tried commitWithin with the standard Solr example in Solr 4.4 and it
works fine.
Can you reproduce your problem using the standard Solr example in Solr 4.4?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Ryan, Brent
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:39 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: JSON upd
I'm prototyping a search product for us and I was trying to use the
"commitWithin" parameter for posting updated JSON documents like so:
curl -v
'http://localhost:8983/solr/proposal.solr/update/json?commitWithin=1'
--data-binary @rfp.json -H 'Content-type:application/json'
However, the com
The grouping (field collapsing) feature somewhat addresses this - group by a
"site" field and then if more than one or a few top pages are from the same
site they get grouped or collapsed so that you can see more sites in a few
results.
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
https://
If you run into this again, try a jstack trace. You should see
evidence of being stuck in SolrCmdDistributor on a variable
called "semaphore"... On current 4x this is around line 420.
If you're using SolrJ, then SOLR-4816 is another thing to try.
But Mark's patch would be best of all to test, If
The very first thing I'd do is see if you can _not_ use joins. Especially
if you're coming from a RDBMS background. Joins in Solr are
somewhat specialized and are NOT equivalent to db joins.
First of all there's no way to get fields from the "from" part
of the join returned in the results. Secondl
Hi,
I have a doubt about the raw query that is parsed from a edismax query.
Form example the query:
_query_:"{!edismax mm=100% bf='log(div(9900,producttier))'
pf='name_synonyms~100^3 name~100^6 heading~100^20' pf2='name_synonyms~100^3
name~100^6 heading~100^20' qf='name_synonyms^3 name^6 heading^
Dimitri
I've added you to the https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ContributorsGroup - feel
free to improve the wiki :)
- Stefan
On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Dmitri Popov wrote:
> Upayavira,
>
> I could edit that page myself, but need to be confirmed human according to
> http://wiki
We had a similar case for multivalued fields with a lot of unique values
per field in some cases. Using facet.method=enum instead of facet.method=fc
fixed the problem. Can run slower though.
Dmitry
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Dennis Schafroth wrote:
> We are harvesting and indexing bibliogr
30 matches
Mail list logo
