Re: Solr cloud replica nodes missing some documents

Any pointer guys. From: Sanjay Lokhande/India/IBM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Date: 08/18/2017 02:12 PM Subject:Solr cloud replica nodes missing some documents Hello guys, I am having 5 nodes solr cloud setup with single shard. The solr version is 5.2.1. server1

Re: Return only matched multi-valued field

Hi, I don't think Lucene/Solr can know which field matches the query you posted. You should usually use Highlighter to know it. Koji On 2017/08/22 2:46, ruby wrote: Is there a way to return only the matched field from a multivalued field using filtering? -- View this message in context:

Re: FastVector does not highlight for phrase query when it contains stop word/s

Recent discussions have recommended that you not use stop words in any case. Cheers -- Rick On August 21, 2017 11:47:11 AM EDT, Jagdish Vasani wrote: >Hi Solr Users, > >I come across issue that fast Vector highlighter does not highlight >field values when

Re: Huge Facets and Streaming

The current approach for high cardinality aggregations is the MapReduce approach: parallel(rollup(search())) But what Yonik describes would be much more efficient. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Thanks

Re: Huge Facets and Streaming

Thanks for sharing this idea, Younik! I've raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11271. On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I need to count really wide

Return only matched multi-valued field

Is there a way to return only the matched field from a multivalued field using filtering? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Return-only-matched-multi-valued-field-tp4351494.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: FastVector does not highlight for phrase query when it contains stop word/s

Hi, Do you analyze your text with StopFilterFactory, in your field type? Regards. On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Jagdish Vasani < jagdish.vas...@thedigitalgroup.com> wrote: > Hi Solr Users, > > I come across issue that fast Vector highlighter does not highlight field > values when search for

FastVector does not highlight for phrase query when it contains stop word/s

Hi Solr Users, I come across issue that fast Vector highlighter does not highlight field values when search for phrase query contains stop word. For example , Query is "blue is the sky" , it will return result but highlighting will not available for this field. I have applied,

Re: Solr sort incorrectly

Thanks a lot Erick! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sort-incorrectly-tp4351419p4351463.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr sort incorrectly

String types do no analysis whatsoever. Therefore case matters, All upper case sorts before all lower case. Punctuation matters. Spaces matter etc. What people often do is create a special field for sorting and normalize it by folding case etc. Usually you have to do this on the input. You might

Re: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work

Have you explored eDismax? You specify what fields you want the query distributed over, often in solrconfig.xml in a request handler. Best, Erick On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Guilleret Florian wrote: > Ok perfect I will do that then i have only 5-6 field so its

facet processing module in Version 6.x needs significantly more time compared to version 4.10

Hi, I can't figure out the reason why the facet processing in version 6 needs significantly more time compared to version 4. The debugging response (for 30 million documents) solr 4 280.00.0280.0 (once the query is cached) before caching: between 1.5 and 2 sec solr 6.x (my last try was with 6.6)

Re: Huge Facets and Streaming

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Hello! > > I need to count really wide facet on 30 shards index with roughly 100M > docs, the facet response is about 100M values takes 0.5G in text file. > > So, far I experimented with old facets. It calculates per

Re: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work

Ok perfect I will do that then i have only 5-6 field so its ok. Thank you for your help ! Guilleret Florian Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06 2017-08-21 13:32 GMT+02:00 Junte Zhang : > Unfortunately not. I would recommend not to use a catch-all

RE: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work

Unfortunately not. I would recommend not to use a catch-all field (saves storage!), but list all the fields you consider "fulltext" in your application in a disjunction query. This should not come at the expensive of performance, unless you have a huge amount of fields. Then it should work.

Huge Facets and Streaming

Hello! I need to count really wide facet on 30 shards index with roughly 100M docs, the facet response is about 100M values takes 0.5G in text file. So, far I experimented with old facets. It calculates per shard facets fine, but then a node which attempts to merge such 30 responses fails due to

Solr sort incorrectly

I am passing a Solr query to fetch few results. Im trying to sort the data based on field of "string" type - documenttitle_s. Below is the full query that is getting passed:

Re: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work

Yes i use the catch all field like : And you rights when I request solr like = this ?df=textNgramStr2 it works perfectly. But is there a way to still use the catch all field ? Because i have other file like name and description who are only in the _text_ and not in textNgramStr2 Kind regards

RE: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work

You have to specify the field where you specified this field analyzer in your request. If you use the catch all field by omitting the field, it does not use your filter factory. /JZ -Original Message- From: Guilleret Florian [mailto:guilleret.flor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August