Hi Shawn,
So I’ve tried running MIGRATE on solr 7.3.1 using the following parameters:
1) “split.key=”
2) “split.key=!”
3) “split.key=DERP_”
4) “split.key=DERP/0!”
For 1-3, I am seeing the same ERRORs you see. For 4, I do not see any ERRORs.
Interestingly, I’m seeing this WARN message for all 4
Hi,
Would like to know , if the CDCR traffic is encrypted.
Thanks
Ra
"And that managed-schema will reorder the entries and delete the comments
on first API modification." - This is something very irritating when
comparing files with the default version of Solr to see what has changed.
When upgrading schemas/configs for new version of Solr, such automatically
Hi folks,
Looks like LUCENE-5795
(https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/173a44e67c7c3c1a9ffbe7259ea8b45f1f53b015#diff-d3409eb300a059322d46e4c9f43717ed)
changed the “lessThan” condition in FreqQ PriorityQueue to actually be less
than in order to only collect top N terms.
However,
On 6/21/2018 9:41 AM, Matthew Faw wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. According to the MIGRATE documentation, the split.key
> parameter is required, and removing it returns a missing parameter exception.
> I’ve tried setting the “split.key=DERP_”, and after doing that I still see
> no documents
SolrNet is not part of the Apache Solr project and isn't supported by them.
I thought the SolrNet project was abandoned, but it seems like work's been
completed on it recently. You might have better luck asking over at the
SolrNet git page: https://github.com/SolrNet/SolrNet.
Best,
Chris
On Fri,
On 6/22/2018 9:29 AM, Prathyusha Kondeti wrote:
> when I search for java using below query
>
> curl
> http://localhost:8983/solr/test/select?fl=score,id=(java)=json=score
> desc
>
> I am expecting the content with *Id :2* should come first as it contains
> more matches related to java.But solr is
Hi Shawn et al,
Thanks a lot for the prompt answer.
It looks to me that I made quite a few mistakes in formulating those solr
queries. Setting shards.qt to the name of the core was completely wrong. I
tried to search for shards.qt in http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/
but it did not give
Hi Support,
We are using Solr 4.2.0 version for one of our ecommerce application where
we are storing entire our catalogue / products.
Application developed in ASP.Net 4.5.2 and hosted in IIS 8.5
Ecommerce application flow is
1. Home page
2. Product Listing page
3.
Hi,
if you add to the request the param : debugQuery=on you will see what
happens under the hood and understand how the score is assigned.
If you are new to the Lucene Similarity that Solr version uses ( BM25[1])
you can paste here the debug score response and we can briefly explain it to
you the
Hi Joel,
Thanks for the reply!
I have indexed graph data in solr where an "event" can have one or more
"participants". Thus, it's a graph of "participants" connected to each
other via "events". Because participants are multiple, I am indexing the
graph as follows.
Hi,
I am using *Solr v6.2.1* .We are not getting accurate results using "sort
score desc".
let's assume we have a list of documents in our index as below
[{ "id": "1", "content": ["*java* developer"] },
{ "id": "2", "content": ["*Java* is object oriented.*Java* robust
language.Core *java* "] },
I'm getting an error on some of the nodes in my solr cloud cluster under
heavy indexing load. Once the error happens, that node, just repeatedly
gets this error over and over and will no longer index documents until a
restart. I believe the root cause of the error is:
File
On 6/22/2018 8:12 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I wonder if having an invalid handler contributed to the speed.
Further thought about this:
I can't say whether having an invalid handler name would cause speed
problems, but based on my limited understanding of the code involved, I
don't think it
On 6/22/2018 6:50 AM, Arturas Mazeika wrote:
I grabbed the 2.7.1 version of solr, created a 4 core setup with
replication factor 2 on windows using [1], I've restarted the setup with
2GB for each node [2], inserted the html docs from the german wikipedia
archive [3], and obtained top 10 terms
Hi Kamal,
Sorry for the late reply. If you're still unsure, the "lucene" query
parser is the default one. The first ref-guide link you posted refers
to it almost ubiquitously as the "Standard Query Parser", but it's the
same thing as the lucene query parser. (The page does say this, but
it's
Hi Solr-Team,
I am familiarizing myself with solr cloud and I am trying out and compare
different processing setups. Short story: term-query ran on shard gives
lower numbers compared querying the complete index. I wonder why.
Long story:
I grabbed the 2.7.1 version of solr, created a 4 core
Hello
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/how-solrcloud-works.html#logical-concepts
A collection can be partitioned into multiple Shards, which contain a
subset of the Documents in the Collection.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/collections-api.html#create-parameters
numShards
The
Hello Team,
I have set up Solr cloud with two Solr nodes connected to a Zookeeper, all
on my local machine. I wanted to know if this whole setup of two nodes and
one Zookeeper constitutes one shard or are these two shards as we have got
two Solr nodes.
Please, enlighten me also about the
Does somebody use LUWAK for percolator functionality in UpdateProcessor? I
noticed that when I passed my docs in batches (3000 docs in batch) through
Monitor I don't get all matching pairs. When I passed my docs in batches
with one doc per batch I get all results. What can it be? Has LUWAK batch
20 matches
Mail list logo
