Hi,
I am getting below error while converting json to my object. I am using Gson
class (gson-2.2.4.jar) to generate json from object and object from json.
gson fromJson() method throws below error.
Note: This was working fine with solr-solrj-5.2.0.jar but it causing issue when
i uses
Thank you for jumping in @hastings.recurs...@gmail.com
I have an index with raw addresses in a nonstandardized format such as "123
main street" or "main street 123", and I am looking to search this index and
pull the closest addresses from another raw input with a similar unpredictable
format.
I’ll add to that since I’m up. Stopwords are in a practical sense useless and
serve no purpose. It’s an old way to save index size that’s not needed any
more. You’d need very specific use cases to want to use them. Maybe you do, but
generally you never do unless it’s for training a machine or
obj = new JavabinCodec().unmarshal();
Utils#writeJson()
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:54 AM Wei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reliable way to convert solr's javabin response to json format?
> We use solrj client with wt=javabin, but want to convert the received
> javabin response to json for
That makes sense, thank you for the clarification!
@wun...@wunderwood.org If you can, please build on your explanation as It
sounds relevant.
-Original Message-
From: Dave
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2019 7:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: jornfra...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Is
It clarifies yes. You need new fields. In this case something like
Address_us
Address_uk
And index and search them accordingly with different stopword files used in
different field types, hence the copy field from “address” into as many new
fields as needed
> On Dec 2, 2019, at 7:33 PM,
To clarify, a document would look like this :
{
address: "123 main Street",
country : "US"
}
What I'd like to do when I configure my index is to apply a set of different
stop words to the address field depending on the value of the country. For
example, something like this :
If (country
Hi Lewin,
Not sure I follow your example. From what I read, you could have one field
lowercased and other not and filter on the first field and facet on the second.
There is probably something that I am missing, so some example would probably
help.
Thanks,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management -
There are two different interpretations of “exact match” going on here, don’t
be confused!
Emir’s version is “the text has to match the _entire_ input. So a field with “a
b c d” will NOT match “a b” or “a b c” or “b c", but only “a b c d”.
David’s version is “The text has to contain some
Hi Omer,
From performance perspective, it is the best if you index title as a single
token: KeywordTokenizer + LowerCaseFilter
If you need to query that field in some other way, you can index it differently
as some other field using copyField.
HTH,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management -
if the query is in quotes it will work. also, not sure if youve been
following, but get rid of:
StopFilterFactory and all stopwords, or just make your stop word file empty
if you need it to work in non quotes, add them to the query post
submission ?
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:44 PM OTH wrote:
>
Hello,
What would be the best way to get exact matches (if any) to a query?
E.g.: Let's the document text is: "united states of america".
Currently, any query containing one or more of the three words "united",
"states", or "america" will match with the above document. I would like a
way so
The best approach is to not use stop words at all. That gives better relevance
with less configuration, so it is a total win.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Dec 2, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Jörn Franke wrote:
>
> You can have different
You can have different fields by country. I am not sure about your stop words
but if they are not occurring in the other languages then you have not a
problem.
On the other hand: it you need more than stop words (eg lemmatizing,
specialized way of tokenization etc) then you need a different
Hi,
I have an index that stores addresses from different countries.
As every country has different stop words, I was wondering if it is possible to
apply a different set of stop words depending on the value of a field.
Or do I need different indexes/do itnat the ETL step to accomplish
Is there any builder for the XMLQueryParser so that we don't need to build as a
String?
And what query DSL are you referring to?
On Mon, 02 Dec 2019 08:00:57 -1100 m...@apache.org wrote
and Query DSL as well. Although, it didn't get the point in the topic
starter.
On Mon, Dec 2,
and Query DSL as well. Although, it didn't get the point in the topic
starter.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:16 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> What about XMLQueryParser:
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/other-parsers.html#xml-query-parser
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov
What about XMLQueryParser:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/other-parsers.html#xml-query-parser
Regards,
Alex.
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 22:43, wrote:
>
> I am trying to simulate the following query(Lucene query builder) using Solr
>
>
>
>
> BooleanQuery.Builder main = new
This is a Solr parameter, how Drupal allows you to pass it on would probably be
a better asked of Drupal.
> On Dec 2, 2019, at 10:01 AM, Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> wrote:
>
> This parameter referers to the Solr request, for example:
>
>
This parameter referers to the Solr request, for example:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_0/result-grouping.html#grouping-by-query
Drupal should expose it in the API, I guess?
Cheers,
diego
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 12/02/19 14:47:06To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Where would I put this parameter ?
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
You can use group.limit parameter to get required number of results per
group. This value is 1 result per group by default.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 7:58 PM alee2 wrote:
> Hello everyone, I need some help with the number of results that is
> generated
> per group, what I need is to control how many
Hello everyone, I need some help with the number of results that is generated
per group, what I need is to control how many results appear per group type,
currently they are sorting out a little bit in a disorderly way, and I can't
get that. end user see all categories, would you like to know if
first of all thank you very much. i was looking for good resource to read
on solr.
i actually already tried the term vector. but for it to work i had to set
the fl=content which response with the value of content field (which really
really big)
Hi,
https://livebook.manning.com/book/solr-in-action/chapter-3 may help (I'd
suggest reading the whole book as well).
Basically what you're looking for is the 'term position'. The
TermVectorComponent in Solr will allow you to return this for each result.
Cheers
Charlie
On 02/12/2019
yes
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 13:29, Bernd Fehling
wrote:
> In short,
>
> you are trying to use an indexer as a full-text search engine, right?
>
> Regards
> Bernd
>
> Am 02.12.19 um 12:24 schrieb eli chen:
> > hi im kind of new to solr so please be patient
> >
> > i'll try to explain what do i
In short,
you are trying to use an indexer as a full-text search engine, right?
Regards
Bernd
Am 02.12.19 um 12:24 schrieb eli chen:
> hi im kind of new to solr so please be patient
>
> i'll try to explain what do i need and what im trying to do.
>
> we a have a lot of books content and we
hi im kind of new to solr so please be patient
i'll try to explain what do i need and what im trying to do.
we a have a lot of books content and we want to index them and allow search
in the books.
when someone search for a term
i need to get back the position of matchen word in the book
for
This sounds like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13963
Solr 8.3.1 is likely to be available soon - RC2 is at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.3.1-RC2-reva3d456fba2cd1b9892defbcf46a0eb4d4bb4d01f/solr/
Re-index on it, and see if you still have issues.
On Sun, 1
29 matches
Mail list logo
