Hi Alexandre,
Yes, these are the same PDF files running in windows and linux. There are
around 30 pdf files and I tried indexing single file, but faced same error. Is
it related to how PDF stored in linux?
And with regard to DIH and TIKA going away, can you share if any program which
extracts
I guess this gets into the point of whether "children" or whatever
field is used for child documents actually needs to be in the schema.
Schemaless mode creates one, but that's not a defining factor. Because
if it needs to be in the schema, then the code should reflect its
cardinality. But if it
Are you running with solr.lock.type=hdfs
?
Have you defined your DirectoryFactory - something like:
true
true
43
name="solr.hdfs.blockcache.direct.memory.allocation">true
16384
true
true
128
1024
Good morning! To add more context on the question, I can successfully use the
Java API to build the list of new Clauses. However, the problem that I have is
that I don't know how to "write" those changes back to solr using the Java API.
I see there's a writeMap method in the Policy class
I think you’re experiencing this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14711
No idea why the bin/solr script won’t work with SSL...
Jan
> 24. aug. 2020 kl. 15:52 skrev Patrik Peng :
>
> Greetings
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a SolrCloud cluster with 3 Zookeeper
> and 3 Solr
The issue seems to be more with a specific file and at the level way
below Solr's or possibly even Tika's:
Caused by: java.io.IOException: expected='>' actual='
' at offset 2383
at
org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.BaseParser.readExpectedChar(BaseParser.java:1045)
Are you indexing the
Hello,
We are using TikaEntityProcessor to extract the content out of PDF and make the
content searchable.
When jetty is run on windows based machine, we are able to successfully load
documents using full import DIH(tika entity). Here PDF's is maintained in
windows file system.
But when
Greetings
I'm in the process of setting up a SolrCloud cluster with 3 Zookeeper
and 3 Solr nodes on FreeBSD and wish to enable SSL between the Solr nodes.
Before enabling SSL, everything worked as expected and I followed the
instructions described in the Solr 8.6 docs
Hi Community members,
I tried the following approaches but non of them worked for my use case.
1. For achieving exact match in solr we have to kept sow='false' (solr will
use field centric matching mode) and grouped multiple similar fields into
one copy field. It does solve the problem of
Thanks.
I just copied the config file under
solr/solr-8.6.0/server/solr/configsets/_default and made minor changes.
Tried the console - I think SKMF is doing it.
Regards,
Jayadevan
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 5:45 PM Dominique Bejean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need to know how is analyzed your catch_all
I don’t think you’ll find an official EOL announcement. Here’s
a guide, but do note the phrase “on demand” for minor releases.
You should interpret “on demand” as when the developers feel
the issues in the current point-release code base are numerous
enough or critical enough to warrant the
Hey man,
I'm wondering where the announcement is, I'm searching the EOL rule of ZK
but found nothing.
can u send me the link of the announcement?I will be very thankful.
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
this is consistent with the data disappearing from Zookeeper due
to misconfiguration and/or some external process removing it when
you reboot.
So here’s what I’d do next:
Go ahead and reboot. You do _not_ need to start Solr to run bin/solr
scripts, and among them are
bin/solr zk ls -r / -z
Hi,
We need to know how is analyzed your catch_all field at index and search
time.
I think you are using a stemming filter and "apache" is stemmed as "apach".
So "apache" and "apach" match the document and not "apac".
You can use the console in order to see how terms are removed or
transformed
Pay attention to this line
SOLR_ULIMIT_CHECKS=falseGC_TUNE=" \
you lost a new line after false.
SOLR_ULIMIT_CHECKS=false
GC_TUNE=" \
Ciao,
Vincenzo
--
mobile: 3498513251
skype: free.dev
> On 24 Aug 2020, at 01:41, Walter Underwood wrote:
>
> Also, what platform is this on and what
Hi all,
I am learning the basics of Solr querying and am not able to figure out
something. The first query which searches for 'apac' fetches no documents.
The second one which searches for 'apach' , i.e. add h - one more
character, fetches a document.
curl -X GET "
On 8/24/2020 12:46 AM, Wang, Ke wrote:
We are using Apache SOLR version 8.4.4.0. The project is planning to
upgrade the Linux server from Oracle Enterprise Linux (Red Hat
Enterprise Linux) 6 to OEL 7. As I was searching on the Confluence
page and was not able to find the information, can I
Yes, it should be no issues to upgrade to RHEL7.
I assume you mean Solr 8.4.0. You can also use the latest Solr version.
Why not RHEL8?
> Am 24.08.2020 um 09:02 schrieb Wang, Ke :
>
Hi there,
We are using Apache SOLR version 8.4.4.0. The project is planning to upgrade
the Linux server from Oracle Enterprise Linux (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) 6 to
OEL 7. As I was searching on the Confluence page and was not able to find the
information, can I please confirm if:
* Apache
>
> Interestingly, I was forced to add children as an array even when the
> child was alone and the field was already marked multivalued. It seems
> the code does not do conversation to multi-value type, which means the
> query code has to be a lot more careful about checking field return
> type
20 matches
Mail list logo
