Hi Henrik,
Try setting up a copyfield in your schema and set the copied field to use
something like 'text_ws' which implements LowerCaseFilterFactory. Then sort on
the copyfield.
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Ossipoff Hansen [mailto:h...@entertainment-trading.com]
Hi Jason,
Assuming you're using DIH, why not build a new, unique id within the query to
use as the 'doc_id' for SOLR? We do something like this in one of our
collections. In MySQL, try this (don't know what it would be for any other db
but there must be equivalents):
select
Hi,
About once a week the admin system comes up with SolrCore Initialization
Failures. There's nothing in the logs and SOLR continues to work in the
application it's supporting and in the 'direct access' mode (i.e.
http://123.465.789.100:8080/solr/collection1/select?q=bingo:*).
The cure is to
SOLR-118, seems an old issue...
On 4 Jul 2013 06:43, David Quarterman da...@corexe.com wrote:
Hi,
About once a week the admin system comes up with SolrCore
Initialization Failures. There's nothing in the logs and SOLR
continues to work in the application it's supporting and in the 'direct
Hi Fabio,
Sandeep is right - it'll take time. SOLR isn't straightforward when you first
start out but the tutorial is the best first step. You can then adapt the
various config files in the tutorial to adapt to your situation. I'd recommend
a simple approach to get the hang of it and just
Hi Fabio,
Like Jack says, try the tutorial. But to answer your question, SOLR isn't a
bolt on to SQLServer or any other DB. It's a fantastically fast
indexing/searching tool. You'll need to use the DataImportHandler (see the
tutorial) to import your data from the DB into the indices that SOLR
: David Quarterman [via Lucene]
ml-node+s472066n4074772...@n3.nabble.com
Date: 02/07/2013 16:57 (GMT+00:00)
To: fabio1605 fabio.to...@btinternet.com
Subject: RE: Newbie SolR - Need advice
Hi Fabio,
Like Jack says, try the tutorial. But to answer your question, SOLR isn't a
bolt
Hi Alvaro,
I agree with Otis Alexandre (esp. Windows + PHP!). However, there are plenty
of people using Solr PHP out there very successfully. There's another good
package at http://code.google.com/p/solr-php-client/ which is easy to implement
and has some example usage.
Regards,
DQ
Hi Erick,
Funnily enough, I cracked it about 5 minutes before your email arrived! Problem
was using WhiteSpaceTokenizer instead of Standard AND had the LowerCaseFilter
after the PorterStemmingFilter. Getting them in the right order has solved all
the problems and we get all our engineer boots,
Hi Marcelo,
Looked through your site and the framework looks very powerful as an
aggregator. We do a lot of data aggregation from many different sources in many
different formats (XML, JSON, text, CSV, etc) using RDBMS as the main
repository for eventual SOLR indexing. A 'one-stop-shop' for
AM, David Quarterman wrote:
This is definitely driving us mad now! Changed to PorterStemming and there's
very little difference.
If we add fq=engineer, we get 0 results. Add fq=engineer* and we get the 90
in the system. Try with fq=ankle* and we get 2. Correct. Try with fq=harness*
and we
: Re: Edismax odd results
When you get back to this tomorrow, also try and paste the parsed query bits
you get back when you append debug=all. Sometimes it's surprising what the
parsed query _really_ looks like
Best
Erick
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, David Quarterman da...@corexe.com
about
Best
Erick
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:13 AM, David Quarterman da...@corexe.com wrote:
Hi Erick,
Debug=all posted on http://justpaste.it/davidqhogdebug. Can't see
anything obvious myselfbut then I'm not an expert!
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Hi all,
We have an index of boots which contains harness boots, engineer boots , ankle
boots, etc. An edismax search on the index for 'harness boots' brings back
2,175 boots with 'harness' results at the top. 'Searching 'engineer boots'
brings back everything but 'engineer boots', same for
to comparing the scoring.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: David Quarterman
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Edismax odd results
Hi all,
We have an index of boots which contains harness boots, engineer boots , ankle
boots, etc
level of INFO) should have a record of what parameters
were actually received when the query was made.
Thanks,
Shawn
On 2/19/2013 9:14 AM, David Quarterman wrote:
Hi Jack,
Here's q test query we've been using:
select?q=+engineer+bootsdefType=edismaxfl=prodnameqf=prodnameplural
spf2
Hi Shawn/Jack,
The log shows the query going in okay, nothing gets stripped out so we're still
at a loss to understand this. Could it be theta Snowball stemming is too
invasive?
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: David Quarterman [mailto:da...@corexe.com]
Sent: 19 February 2013 16
reduces 'engineer' to 'engin' so I'd have expected a lot more
results.
Anyone got any ideas?
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: David Quarterman [mailto:da...@corexe.com]
Sent: 19 February 2013 17:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Edismax odd results
Hi Shawn/Jack
Hi Shawn,
Now finished for the day but will post the schema tomorrow. Thanks for the help
(and Jack too).
Regards,
DQ
P.S. did reindex after changing schema and the analyzer/query stuff matches
precisely!!
Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 2/19/2013 11:16 AM, David Quarterman wrote
We had a similar requirement and found the best solution (unfortunately)
was to spend a small amount of money. Have a look at Sematext's site
(www.sematext.com). Their Autocomplete is awesome and we have a
fantastic looking AC now on our development site, grouped by category,
product brand with
Fernando,
Pretty much the problem we came up against. We had a basic AC running
using SpellChecker a while ago but it was the grouping that floored us
and sent us elsewhere. Again, multiple queries seemed like the only
possible answer but in an AC scenario, even with SOLR's speed, probably
too
Hi,
We've been using V4.x of SOLR since last November without too much
trouble. Our MySQL database is refreshed daily and a full import is run
automatically after the refresh and generally produces around 86,000
products, obviously on unique doc_id's.
So, we upgraded to 4.0 Beta a few days
44/solr/
There will be an RC2 sometime, a couple of problems have been found, but
using RC1 should minimize any update to the official 4.0 plus have a lot
of improvements over BETA...
Best
Erick
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, David Quarterman da...@corexe.com
wrote:
Hi,
We've been using V4.x
23 matches
Mail list logo