Hi all,
I uploaded a patch (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5972) that
contains a new statistics result for a field - existInDoc.
It returns the number of documents in which the field has a value (not missing).
This patch is bason on Solr 4.4.
For multivalue fields there is a
Hi all,
I am trying to apply SOLR-6024 patch to Solr 4.8.
I have some compilation errors with it (detailed in Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/SOLR-6024).
How can I change the patch to be applied to 4.8?
Thanks.
shalinman...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Elran,
You need to explicitly specify the DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory
in the chain and then add your custom processor after it.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your suggestion.
I
.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov Solr resources and
newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers
community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
On 26 October 2014 12:00, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Thanks for your response
(the value of the increment from the input
document).
On 27 October 2014 18:03, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
I will explain with an example.
Let's say field_a is sent in the update with the value of 5. field_a
is already stored in the document with the value 8.
After the update
Hi all,
Did anyone have a chance to review my idea?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:42 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: suggestion for new custom atomic update
Hi all,
This is my use case:
I have a stored field, field_a, which is atomic updated
Subject: RE: suggestion for new custom atomic update
Can't you do the calculation in custom UpdateRequestProcessor?
Regards,
Alex
On 26/10/2014 4:17 am, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Hi all,
Did anyone have a chance to review my idea?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From
Hi all,
This is my use case:
I have a stored field, field_a, which is atomic updated (let's say by inc).
field_a is stored but not indexed due to the large number of distinct values it
can have.
I need to index field_b (I need facet and stats on it) which is not in the
document but its value
Hi all,
I created a patch for new statistics facet capabilities to StatsComponent facet
- limit, sort and missing.
This can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5972
Can it have committer attention?
Thanks.
you think?
But when no value is sent with severity, and the default of 0 is used, the fix
doesn't seem to work.
How can I make it work also for default values?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 3:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi all,
I have an enumField called severity.
these are its relevant definitions in schema.xml:
field name=severity type=severityType indexed=true stored=true
docValues=true default=0/ fieldType name=severityType
class=solr.EnumField enumsConfig=enumsConfig.xml enumName=severity/
copyField
Are you saying that default values are for query and not for indexing?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 9:38 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: copy EnumField to text field
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Elran
the source input value to the default value if it is missing,
but you would have to specify an explicit value for the URP to use.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 4:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: copy EnumField to text
, before the
actual field type has had a chance to process it in any way.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 8:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: copy EnumField to text field
So if I have a document without severity, I can't see
: change in EnumField configuration - what do you think?
Would both then be supported? I see where it would be easily detectable.
And I also assume that this wouldn't break back-compat?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am the one
Hi all,
I am the one that contributed EnumField code to Solr.
There was a long discussion how the integer values of an enum field should be
indicated in the configuration.
It was decided that the integer value wouldn't be written explicitly, but would
be implicitly determined by the value
Hi all,
In my index, I have an EnumField called severity. This is its configuration in
enumsConfig.xml:
enum name=severity
valueNot Available/value
valueLow/value
valueMedium/value
valueHigh/value
valueCritical/value
/enum
My index contains
Does anyone have an answer for this?
Thanks.
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is there a way to change transientCacheSize dynamically without
restarting Solr
Hi All,
Is there an API in Solr to change transientCacheSize dynamically
Hi,
Did anyone have a chance to take a look at this issue?
Thanks.
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Reloading core with param vs unloading and creating with params
Hi all,
I created a new patch https://issues.apache.org/jira
there is way to do that right now.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Does anyone have an answer for this?
Thanks.
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is there a way to change
Hi All,
Is there an API in Solr to change transientCacheSize dynamically without the
need to restart Solr?
Is there other Solr configuration parameters that can be changed dynamically?
Thanks.
Hi all,
I created a new patch https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6063 ,
enabling changes in core properties without the need to unload and create it.
Considering the change in patch,
is reloading a core with transient=true and loadOnStartup=false equivalent in
memory footprint to
Does anyone know a way to do this?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 4:11 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: How can I convert xml message for updating a Solr index to a
javabin file
I want to measure xml vs javabin update message
Hi all,
Is there a way I can covert a xml Solr update message file to javabin file? If
so, How?
How can I use curl to update Solr by javabin message file?
Thank you very much.
file
Why would you want to do this? Javabin is used by SolrJ to communicate with
Solr. XML is good enough for communicating from the command line/curl, as is
JSON. Attempting to use javabin just seems to add an unnecessary complication.
Upayavifra
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Elran Dvir
that your network is just slow, that's certainly a difference between
the local and remote case, but that's a stab in the dark.
Not much help I know,
Erick
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Erick, Thanks for your response.
We are upgrading our system
at 2:54 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am using Solr 4.4 with multi cores. One core (called template) is my
routing core.
When I run
http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/template/select?rows=5000q=*:*shards=127.
0.0.1:8983/solr/core1,
it consistently takes about 7s.
When I
Hi all,
I am using Solr 4.4 with multi cores. One core (called template) is my
routing core.
When I run
http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/template/select?rows=5000q=*:*shards=127.0.0.1:8983/solr/core1,
it consistently takes about 7s.
When I run http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/core1/select?rows=5000q=*:*,
Subject: Re: new field type - enum field
OK, if you can attach it to an e-mail, I'll attach it.
Just to check, though, make sure you're logged in. I've been fooled once or
twice by being automatically signed out...
Erick
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote
attach it.
Just to check, though, make sure you're logged in. I've been fooled once or
twice by being automatically signed out...
Erick
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Thanks, Erick.
I have tried it four times. It keeps failing.
The problem reoccurred
should be able to attach a patch, wonder if there was some temporary glitch
in the JIRA. Is this persisting.
Let us know if this continues...
Erick
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Hi,
I have created an issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Hi,
I have implemented like Chris described it:
The field is indexed as numeric, but displayed as string, according to
configuration.
It applies to facet, pivot, group and query.
How do we proceed
Hi,
I have implemented like Chris described it:
The field is indexed as numeric, but displayed as string, according to
configuration.
It applies to facet, pivot, group and query.
How do we proceed? How do I contribute it?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter
Hi All,
We have encountered a use case in our system where we have a few fields
(Severity. Risk etc) with a closed set of values, where the sort order for
these values is pre-determined but not lexicographic (Critical is higher than
High). Generically this is very close to how enums work.
To
Hi all,
StatsComponent doesn't work if field's type is TextField.
I get the following message:
Field type
textstring{class=org.apache.solr.schema.TextField,analyzer=org.apache.solr.analysis.TokenizerChain,args={positionIncrementGap=100,
sortMissingLast=true}} is not currently supported.
My
component to break them up.
At least there's no filter that I know of that takes a delimited set of numbers
and transforms them.
FWIW,
Erick
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Hi all,
StatsComponent doesn't work if field's type is TextField.
I get
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade Solr index from 4.0 to 4.2.1
LUCENE_40 since your original index was built with 4.0.
As for the other, I'll defer to people who actually know what they're talking
about.
Best
Erick
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
My
-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:48 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Upgrade Solr index from 4.0 to 4.2.1
Why LUCENE_42?Why not LUCENE_41?
Do I still need to run IndexUpgrader or just loading will be enough?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Erick
Hi all,
I have a 4.0 Solr (sharded/cored) index.
I upgraded Solr to 4.2.1 and tried to load the existing index with it. I got
the following exception:
May 21, 2013 12:03:42 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: null:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unable to create core:
4.0 to 4.2.1
This is always something that gives me a headache, but what happens if you
change luceneMatchVersion in solrconfig.xml to LUCENE_40? I'm assuming it's
LUCENE_42...
Best
Erick
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 4.0 Solr
40 matches
Mail list logo
