Sounds reasonable. File a Jira!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Johnson
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 11:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: DateMathParser question
I have found that DateMathParser is extremely useful in providing nice
labels back
The similarity class is only invoked at query time, so it doesn't
participate in indexing.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 6:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: does one need to reindex when changing similarity
white space as white
space here.
And update the Lucene Javadoc contract to be more explicit.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; solr-user
Subject: RE: WhitespaceTokenizer to consider
quoted, and then analyzed to nothing for text fields but is still a string
for string fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lanke,Aniruddha
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: eDisMax parser and special characters
Sorry
Definitely sounds like a bug! File a Jira. Thanks for reporting this. What
release of Solr?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pawel Rog
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 3:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Edismax parser and boosts
Hi,
I use edismax query
The LucidWorks product has builtin crawler support so you could crawl one or
more web sites.
http://lucidworks.com/product/fusion/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Vishal Sharma
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 2:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Best way
separate clusters
for larger groups of customers, maybe with a smaller cluster with a
collection that maps the customer ID to a Solr cluster, and then the
application layer can direct requests to the Solr cluster that owns that
customer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
the string term to match, which won't happen since only the full
string is indexed.
Generally, you need to escape all special characters in a query. Then
hopefully your string field will match.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Hubold
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11
on the string field, but a
tokenized phrase match on the text field, and support partial matches on the
text field as a phrase of contiguous terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Hubold
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 12:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
What exactly do you think that filter query is doing? Explain it in plain
English.
My guess is that it eliminates all your document matches.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: PeterKerk
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 12:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
to apply a boost
to all un-fielded terms for a field, you otherwise need to apply any boost
on a term, not a field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: PeterKerk
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flexible search field analyser
That's a reasonable description for Solr/Lucene scoring, but use the latest
release:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_10_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/similarities/TFIDFSimilarity.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: mdemarco123
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 6:06 PM
Yes, either term can be used to confuse people equally well!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alejandro Calbazana
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: Re: Solr + Federated Search Question
Thanks Ahmet. Yay! New
token gets analyzed into - that's what your wildcard prefix must
match. Sometimes (usually!) you will be surprised.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Wayne W
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 7:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Wildcard search makes no sense!!
Hi
Unless you consider yourself to be a Solr expert, it would be best to
implement such query translation in an application layer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: sagarprasad
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 3:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Adding filter
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr + Federated Search Question
Hi,
Federation is possible. Solr has distributed search support with shards
parameter.
Ahmet
On Wednesday
The special characters (colon) are treated as term delimiters for text
field. How do you really intend to query this string. You could make it
simply a string field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: J'roo
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:08 AM
To: solr-user
of
the terms rather than any of the three terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: shamik
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Boost Query (bq) syntax/usage
Hi,
I'm little confused with the right syntax of defining boost
The + signs in the parsed boost query indicated the terms were ANDed
together, but maybe you can use the q.op and mm parameters to change the
default operator (I forget!).
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: shamik
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:19 PM
To: solr-user
with
dismax and then specify edismax for bq using the localParam notation.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Boost Query (bq) syntax/usage
The + signs in the parsed boost query
That's called phrase query - selecting documents based on the order of the
terms. Just enclose the terms in quotes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tomer Levi
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: multiple terms order
You can perform boolean operations using parentheses. So you can OR a
sequence of sub-queries, and each sub-query can be an AND of the desired
search term and the constraining values for other fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shamik Bandopadhyay
Sent: Monday
And you can also check out the tutorials in any of the Solr books, including
my Solr Deep Dive e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent
pf and ps merely control boosting of documents, not selection of documents.
mm controls selection of documents.
So, hopefully at least doc3 is returned before doc2.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Tomer Levi
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:39 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: multiple
And how is the schema field declared. Seems like it's a TrieDoubleField,
which should be a simple floating point value. You should be using the
spatial field types.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 12:20 PM
To: solr-user
The wildcard query is “constant score” to make it faster, so unfortunately that
means there is no score differentiation between the wildcard matches.
You can simple add the wildcard prefix as a separate query term and boost it:
q=text:carre* text:carre^1.5
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Pigeyre
I am not aware of any such feature! That doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but
I don't recall seeing it in the Solr source code.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Luis Betancourt Gonzalez
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:31 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
Or simply enclosed the full term in quotes:
q=path:my path
Which is more properly encoded as:
q=path:%22my+path%22
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: query for space
name=echoParamsexplicit/str
int name=rows10/int
str name=dftext/str
/lst
...
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Luis Betancourt Gonzalez
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:02 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Changed behavior in solr 4 ??
Hi:
I’m
Do a copyField to a numeric field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to summarize a String Field ?
You cannot do this as far as I know, it must be a numeric field
You can use an update request processor to filter the input for large
values. You could write a script with the stateless script processor which
ignores or trims large input values.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Gross
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 7:58 AM
page as a string field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 8:39 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Solr Exceptions -- immense terms
May not need a script for that:
http://www.solr-start.com/javadoc/solr-lucene/org/apache/solr
Waiting for a positive response!
-1
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rakesh Varna
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 10:18 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mongo DB Users
Remove
Regards,
Rakesh Varna
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Ed Smiley ed.smi
for string field
queries, and that don't use wildcard, fuzzy, or range queries. And maybe
also keyword tokenizer text fields that don't have any filters, which might
as well be string fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: FiMka
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 9:34 AM
To: solr
It is mostly a matter of how you expect to query that data - do you need
different queries for different sources, or do you have a common conceptual
model that covers all sources with a common set of queries?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vineet yadav
Sent: Tuesday
Out of curiosity, what would be an example query for your application that
would depend on sentence tokenization, as opposed to simple term
tokenization? I mean, there are no sentence-based query operators in the
Solr query parsers.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep
to
short queries. Keep in mind that auto-detection for indexing full documents
is a different problem that auto-detection for very short queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ilia Sretenskii
Sent: Sunday, September 7, 2014 10:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
Payload really don't have first class support in Solr. It's a solid feature
of Lucene, but never expressed well in Solr. Any thoughts or proposals are
welcome!
(Hmmm... I wonder what the good folks at Heliosearch have up their sleeves
in this area?!)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
relevance.
The similarity vector is created during item processing and indicates the most
important terms or concepts in the item and the corresponding weight.”
See:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ff521597(v=office.14).aspx
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Jürgen Wagner (DVT)
Sent: Friday
the same source text in multiple fields, one for each
language. You can then do a dismax query on that set of fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ilia Sretenskii
Sent: Friday, September 5, 2014 10:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to implement
Sounds like a great future to add to Solr, especially if it would facilitate
more automatic relevancy enhancement. LucidWorks Search has a feature called
unsupervised feedback that does that but something like a docvector might
make it a more realistic default.
-- Jack Krupansky
listing up to date, including regional availability and any
specialties.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: elisabeth benoit
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 4:02 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: looking for a solr/search expert in Paris
Hello,
We are looking
how to define and use custom
analyzers as well.
No, Solr does not have that feature per se - you have to specify a custom
field TYPE to specify the analyzer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ankit Jain
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 2:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: How many of your collections need to be
simultaneously active? Say, in a one-hour period, how many of them will be
updating and serving queries, and what query load per-collection and total
query load do you need to design for?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Christoph
be great to have a standalone DIH that runs as a separate server
and then sends standard Solr update requests to a Solr cluster.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lee Chunki
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: external indexer
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 11:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: external indexer for Solr Cloud
On 9/1/2014 7:19 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
It would be great to have a standalone DIH that runs as a separate
simply
query:
php_skill:[5 TO *] AND ruby_skill:[2 TO *]
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: amid
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 12:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Indexing search list of Key/Value pairs
Hi,
I'm using solr and trying to index a list of key/value
AND 10 or more years of Software Development.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: amid
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 12:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Indexing search list of Key/Value pairs
Hi Jack,
Thanks for the fast response.
I assume that using
scenario at this time. Certainly suggestions for future
enhancement can be made though.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 4:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Scaling to large Number of Collections
we see at least
You close with two great questions for the community!
We have a similar issue over in Apache Cassandra database land (thousands of
tables).
There is no immediate, easy, great answer. Other than the kinds of
workarounds being suggested.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
for a few shards or even just a single shard, and to instead focus
the attention on large number of collections rather than heavily-sharded
collections.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
an application layer that
forces that filter to be added.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: cmd.ares
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 2:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: solr result handler??
I have a blackliststring save some keywords,and the query results need
What exactly are you referring to by the term external indexer?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lee Chunki
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 7:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: external indexer for Solr Cloud
Hi,
Is there any way to run external indexer for solar
That said, maybe you could provide a couple of examples of exactly what you
want to do.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ankit Jain
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Specify Analyzer per field
Hi All,
I would like to use schema less
Different field TYPES, not different fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Specify Analyzer per field
Hi,
I think he wants to change query analyzer dynamically, where index
But that doesn't let him change or override the analyzer for the field type.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:55 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Specify Analyzer per field
Can't you just use old fashion dynamic fields
My other thought was that maybe he wants to do index updates outside of the
cluster that is handling queries, and then copy in the completed index.
Or... maybe take replicas out of the query rotation while they are updated.
Or... maybe this is yet another X-Y problem!
-- Jack Krupansky
-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/URLClassifyProcessor.html
The official doc is... pitiful, but I have doc and examples in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
, you could use a regex query term, but better to avoid that if at
all possible.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: nutchsolruser
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 12:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr range query issue
Hi ,
I Am using solr 4.6.1 . I have name
chosen
hardware, both a single machine and a small cluster, and measure how much
load it can handle and how it performs. And then scale your cluster based on
that application-specific performance data.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: lalitjangra
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Is the high usage just suddenly happening after a long period of up-time
without it, or is this on a server restart? The latter can happen if you
have a large commit log to replay because you haven't done hard commits.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent
by adding this attribute:
luceneMatchVersion=4.3
But... the old behavior is now deprecated, so it mostly likely will not be
in Solr 5.0.
I'll think about this some more as to whether there might be some workaround
or alternative.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
I agree that it's a bad situation, and wasn't handled well by the Lucene
guys. They may have had good reasons, but they didn't execute a decent plan
for how to migrate existing behavior.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 6:51 AM
That's a completely different concept, I think - the ability to return a
single field value as a structured JSON object in the writer, rather than
simply loading from a nested JSON object and distributing the key values
to normal Solr fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shay Sofer
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:02 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Exact search with special characters
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I thought that google search work the same (quotes stand for exact match).
Example
, try adding enablePositionIncrements=false, reindex, and see
what happens.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with StopFilterFactory
A valid search:
http://pastie.org/pastes/9500661
to make Solr more automatic and more
approachable, not an even more complicated toolkit.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 9:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: embedded documents
Jack et al - there’s now this, which
And a comparison to Elasticsearch would be helpful, since ES gets a lot of
mileage from their super-easy JSON support. IOW, how much of the ES
advantage is eliminated.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 1:59 PM
To: solr-user
, but the concept of exact match is not
supported for tokenized and filtered text fields.
So, please describe, in plain English, plus examples, exactly what you
expect your analyzer to do, both in terms of how it treats text to be
indexed and how you expect to be able to query that text.
-- Jack
be problematic.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Pitsounis
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 7:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: embedded documents
Hello everybody,
I had a requirement to store complicated json documents in solr.
i have modified
confused
the discussion here by failing to do so on at least one occasion, and
possibly in this latest response although I can't tell for sure.
5. We'll confirm either any mistakes you've made, recommendations, and
whether there are any bugs.
Fair enough?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
so that we can see what was really generated for the
query.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 12:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with StopFilterFactory
I don't see any confusions, the problem is clearly explained
Just to confirm, the generated phrase query is generated using the analyzed
terms, so if the stop filter is removing the terms, they won't appear in the
generated query. It will be interesting to see what does get generated.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent
use case clearly - there may be some
better way to try to achieve it.
Use the analysis page of the Solr Admin UI to see the detailed query and
index analysis of your terms. You'll be surprised.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automotive-Service
in the original query, the
implementation (BooleanQuery) uses the terms generated by the analysis
process, which can break up source terms into multiple terms and generate
extra terms as well. Any MM number or percentage will count the terms output
by analysis, not the source terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
Uhhh... UIMA... and parameter checking... NOT. You're probably missing
something, but there is so much stuff.
I have some examples in my e-book that show various errors you can get for
missing/incorrect parameters for UIMA:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early
For the sake of completeness, please post the parsed query that you get when
you add the debug=true parameter. IOW, how Solr/Lucene actually interprets
the query itself.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:03 AM
To: solr-user
performance, as long
as the prefix isn't too short (e.g., cat*). See PrefixQuery:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_9_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/PrefixQuery.html
ngram filters can also be used, but... that can make the index rather large.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Umesh
to confirm whether you really need to use
string as opposed to text field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth S
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Substring and Case In sensitive Search
Hi,
I am very new to solr.How can I
CPU-bound or I/O-bound?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: SolrUser1543
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 2:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Performance of Boolean query with hundreds of OR clauses.
I am using Solr to perform search for finding similar pictures
What release of Solr?
Do you have autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true on the field?
And when you said But any of these does, did you mean But NONE of these
does?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 2:34 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
In any case, besides the raw code and the similarity Javadoc, Lucene does
have Javadoc for file formats:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_9_0/core/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene49/package-summary.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Sunday, August 17
query, and pivot query, with
QTime, and debug=true timing to show which search components are consuming
the time.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Oded Sofer
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:29 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Question
Hello
We are implementing
patterns, which you will
have to test for yourself, you will probably need to use an application
layer to shard your 100s of billions to specific SolrCloud clusters.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Wilburn, Scott
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 11:05 AM
To: solr-user
Why? The semantics are defined by the code and similarity matching
algorithm, not... files.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: abhi Abhishek
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:40 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: explaination of query processing in SOLR
Thanks
Could you clarify what you mean with the term cloud, as in per cloud and
individual clouds? That's not a proper Solr or SolrCloud concept per se.
SolrCloud works with a single cluster of nodes. And there is no
interaction between separate SolrCloud clusters.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
with a rule of thumb of 100 million documents per node (and
that is million, not billion.) That could be a lot higher - or a lot lower -
based on your actual schema and data value distribution.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Wilburn, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Use the parse date update request processor:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_9_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html
Additional examples are in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7
The use of a wildcard suppresses analysis of the query term, so the special
characters remain, but... they were removed when the terms were indexed, so
no match. You must manually emulate the index term analysis in order to use
wildcards.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
Generally, large requests are an anti-pattern in modern distributed
systems. Better to have a number of smaller requests executing in parallel
and then merge the results in the application layer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Mannina
Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014
that it is not a massive, blocking request.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Mannina
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 6:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How can I request a big list of values ?
Hi Anshum,
I can do it with 3.6 release no ?
my main problem, it's that I have
potential of a system, which in this case is
parallel execution of distributed components.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Mannina
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 6:01 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How can I request a big list of values ?
Hi Jack,
ok
(Search
Components), but none of it is down at that Lucene file level.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: abhi Abhishek
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 7:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: explaination of query processing in SOLR
Hello,
I am fairly new to SOLR, can
And the Solr Support list is where people register their available
consulting services:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Support
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 9:12 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Help Required
We don't mediate
and use more powerful hardware.
Architect your application and model your data around the strengths of Solr
(and Lucene.) And also look at your queries first, to make sure they will
make sense.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lisheng Zhang
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 5:25
The word delimiter filter is actually combining 100-001 into 11. You
have BOTH catenateNumbers AND catenateAll, so 100-R8989 should generate
THREE tokens: the concatenated numbers 100, the concatenated words R8989,
and both numbers and words concatenated, 100R8989 .
-- Jack Krupansky
almost anything you want, but its
up to you to decide what you want to index. IOW, it is your obligation to
come up with a data model. And the data model should be driven in large part
by the query and access requirements mentioned above.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
OR tractor.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Corey Gerhardt
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 1:14 PM
To: Solr User List
Subject: Suggestion for term searches
I have an interesting situation of searching Business Names where results
should be partially sorted by position.
Searching
a stream of
flat documents.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ali Nazemian
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: indexing comments with Apache Solr
Dear Alexandre,
Hi,
Thank you very much. I think nested document is what I need. Do you
An update request processor could do the trick. You can use the stateless
script update processor to code a JavaScript snippet to do whatever logic
you want. Plenty of examples in my e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product
401 - 500 of 2475 matches
Mail list logo
