Re: Configuring shardhandler factory for select handler

figured out referred to the docs here https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/0ce635ec01e9d3ce04a5fbf5d472ea9d5d28bfee?short_path=421a323#diff-421a323f596319f0485e0b03070d94e6 Thanks Jay On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:38 PM Jay Potharaju wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to update the conn

Configuring shardhandler factory for select handler

Hi, I am trying to update the connection & sockettime out value for my `select` handler. After updating the configs i do not see that value being set and it defaults to 60 sec. How can i update these values? Also looks like the docs have sockeTimeout & connectionTimeout values swapped.

Re: cdcr replicator NPE errors

Thanks Shawn! Can any of the committers comment about the CDCR error that I posted above? Thanks Jay On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:56 PM Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 10/25/2019 3:22 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote: > > Is there a solr slack channel? > > People with @apache.org email addres

Re: cdcr replicator NPE errors

Is there a solr slack channel? Thanks Jay Potharaju On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:00 AM Jay Potharaju wrote: > Hi, > I am frequently seeing cdcr-replicator null pointer exception errors in > the logs. > Any suggestions on how to address this? > *Solr version: 7.7.2* > > Ex

cdcr replicator NPE errors

Hi, I am frequently seeing cdcr-replicator null pointer exception errors in the logs. Any suggestions on how to address this? *Solr version: 7.7.2* ExecutorUtil Uncaught exception java.lang.NullPointerException thrown by thread: cdcr-replicator-773-thread-3 java.lang.Exception: Submitter stack

Solr field auditing

Hi, I am trying to implement some auditing fields in solr to track when was the last time a document was updated. Basically when a document is updated, I would like to store when the last time updated + the current timestamp. example : *First time indexing* Doc1 : {id:1, category:shoes,

Re: Relevance by term position

boost for earlier matches. > The other approach suggested was to use Payloads (which got better > since the original thread). > > Regards, > Alex. > >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 22:01, Jay Potharaju wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I am trying to implement autocomplete f

Relevance by term position

Hi, I am trying to implement autocomplete feature that should rank documents based on term position in the search field. Example- Doc1- hello world Doc2- blue sky hello Doc3 - John hello Searching for hello should return Hello world John hello Blue sky hello I am currently using ngram to do

Autocomplete results from multiple fields

Hi I am trying to implement autocomplete feature from two fields, name & attribute1. I have setup ngram for both the fields and have copyfield that stores the ngrams results. fl only contains name which is used by ui. Is it possible to display records that match on values from attribute1? The

CDCR - shards not in sync

Hi, I have a collection with 8 shards. 6 out of the shards are in sync but the other 2 are lagging behind by more than 10 plus hours. The tlog is only 0.5 GB in size. I have tried stopping and starting CDCR number of times but it has not helped. >From what i have noticed there is always a shard

Solr 7.7 - group faceting errors

java:721) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getTermCounts(SimpleFacets.java:497) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getTermCounts(SimpleFacets.java:426) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.lambda$getFacetFieldCounts$0(SimpleFacets.java:826) ... 46 more Thanks Jay Potharaju

Re: Re: solr _route_ key now working

I was reading the debug info incorrectly it is working as expected ...thanks for the help. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:58 PM Jay Potharaju wrote: > Edwin, I tried escaping the special characters but it does not seems to > work. I am using 7.7 > Than

Re: Re: solr _route_ key now working

the shard. fq=fieldB:456=shard1. Any suggestions why that would not be working when using _route_ to query the documents. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:58 AM Branham, Jeremy (Experis) < jb...@allstate.com> wrote: > Jay – > I’m not familiar with the document I

Re: Java 9 & solr 7.7.0

I just learnt that java 11 is . Is anyone using open jdk11 in production? Thanks > On Mar 23, 2019, at 5:15 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote: > > I have not kept up with jdk versions ...will try with jdk 11 and see if it > addresses the high cpu issue. Thanks > > >> On M

Re: solr _route_ key now working

, so it requires escaping during > the search. > You can try to search with query _route_="a\:b!". > > Regards, > Edwin > >> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 07:59, Jay Potharaju wrote: >> >> Hi, >> My document id has a format of a:b!c, when I query _route_=&

solr _route_ key now working

Hi, My document id has a format of a:b!c, when I query _route_="a:b!" it does not return any values. Any suggestions? Thanks Jay Potharaju

Re: Java 9 & solr 7.7.0

I have not kept up with jdk versions ...will try with jdk 11 and see if it addresses the high cpu issue. Thanks > On Mar 23, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Jay Potharaju wrote: > > Thanks for that info Tim > >> On Mar 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Tim Underwood wrote: >> >> We

Re: Java 9 & solr 7.7.0

gt;> Finally, there was one issue with JDK 9 and Kerberos that I’m unsure what >> the resolution is, if there is any. If you use Kerberos, be sure to test >> that first. >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >>> On Mar 23, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Jay Potharaju >> wrot

Re: Java 9 & solr 7.7.0

Thanks I missed that info. Will try running with jdk9 and see if it addresses the issue. Jay > On Mar 23, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > >> On 3/23/2019 8:12 AM, Jay Potharaju wrote: >> Can I use java 9 with 7.7.0. I am planning to test if fixes issue with high

Java 9 & solr 7.7.0

Hi Can I use java 9 with 7.7.0. I am planning to test if fixes issue with high cpu that I am running into. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129861 Was solr 7.7 tested with java 9? Thanks Jay

Re: CDCR issues

This might be causing the high CPU in 7.7.x. https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/eb652b84edf441d8369f5188cdd5e3ae2b151434#diff-e54b251d166135a1afb7938cfe152bb5 That is related to this JDK bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129861. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Thu, Mar 21, 2019

CDCR issues

Hi, I just enabled CDCR for one collection. I am seeing high CPU usage and the high number of tlog files and increasing. The collection does not have lot of data , just started reindexing of data. . Solr 7.7.0 , implicit sharding 8 shards I have enabled buffer on source side and disabled buffer

Re: copyfield not working

ient side or by an > UpdateRequestProcessor). > > Cheers, > Andrea > > On 14/01/2019 08:46, Jay Potharaju wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a copy field in which i am copying the contents of text_en field > to > > another custom field. > > After indexing i was expect

Re: copyfield not working

copyfield syntax from my schema file... Thanks Jay On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:46 PM Jay Potharaju wrote: > Hi, > I have a copy field in which i am copying the contents of text_en field to > another custom field. > After indexing i was expecting any of the specia

copyfield not working

Hi, I have a copy field in which i am copying the contents of text_en field to another custom field. After indexing i was expecting any of the special characters in the paragraph to be removed, but it does not look like that is happening. The copied content is same as the what is there in the

Re: Search query with & without question mark

: 32.0 = docFreq 275.0 = docCount 0.82538307 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 1.2 = parameter k1 0.75 = parameter b 3.4436364 = avgFieldLength 5.224489

Search query with & without question mark

Hi, When searching I get different results when the query contains question mark vs without question mark . The field i am searching on does not have any question marks. Any suggestions? < tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> < filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>

Re: CDCR Custom Document Routing

Solr cdcr : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12380 deletebyid: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8889 Thanks Jay Potharaju On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:41 PM Jay Potharaju wrote: > Hi Amrit, > I am using a curl command to send a request to solr for deleting >

Re: CDCR Custom Document Routing

uot;: {"id":"documentid13123123"} }' The deletes doesn't seem to propagate correctly to the target side. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:37 PM Amrit Sarkar wrote: > Jay, > > Can you sample delete command you are firing at the source to understand > the

CDCR Custom Document Routing

: 8 shards : 2 on each node Solr:6.6.4 Thanks Jay Potharaju

Re: deletebyQuery vs deletebyId

hat the deletions can be routed to the correct leader > > by hashing on the id field. > > > > Best, > > Erick > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks Emir & Shawn for chim

Re: deletebyQuery vs deletebyId

> Thanks, > Emir > -- > Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection > Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ > > > > > On 23 May 2018, at 02:35, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi,

deletebyQuery vs deletebyId

Hi, I have a quick question about deletebyQuery vs deleteById. When using deleteByQuery, if query is id:123 is that same as deleteById in terms of performance. Thanks Jay

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

that would explain about inner working of solrcloud networking? Thanks Jay org.apache.solr.update.StreamingSolrClients > > org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor$DistributedUpdatesAsyncException: > Async exception during > On May 13, 2018, at 9:21 PM, Jay Pothara

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

nitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection > Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ > > > > > On 8 May 2018, at 17:53, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Emir, > > I was seeing this error

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

work blip and there are a few errors for streaming solr client...but have never seen this error before. Thanks Jay Thanks Jay Potharaju On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Emir Arnautović < emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Hi Jay, > This is low ingestion rate. What is the size of

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

I have about 3-5 updates per second. > On May 7, 2018, at 5:02 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > >> On 5/7/2018 5:05 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote: >> There are some deletes by query. I have not had any issues with DBQ, >> currently have 5.3 running in p

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

Thanks for explaining that Shawn! Emir, I use php library called solarium to do updates/deletes to solr. The request is sent to any of the available nodes in the cluster. > On May 7, 2018, at 5:02 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > >> On 5/7/2018 5:05 PM, J

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

There are some deletes by query. I have not had any issues with DBQ, currently have 5.3 running in production. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > The updates are pushed in real time not batched. No complex

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

The updates are pushed in real time not batched. No complex analysis and everything is committed using autocommit settings in solr. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Emir Arnautović < emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > How do you send documents? Large batches

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

I didn't see any OOM errors in the logs on either of the nodes. I saw GC pause of 1 second on the box that was throwing error ...but nothing on the other node. Any other recommendations? Thanks Thanks Jay Potharaju On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

Ah thanks for explaining that! Thanks Jay Potharaju On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Emir Arnautović < emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Node A receives batch of documents to index. It forwards documents to > shards that are on the node B. Node B is having issues with GC

Re: Async exceptions during distributed update

. thanks Thanks Jay Potharaju On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Emir Arnautović < emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Hi Jay, > My first guess would be that there was some major GC on other box so it > did not respond on time. Are your nodes well balanced - do they serve equal &

Async exceptions during distributed update

Hi, I am seeing the following lines in the error log. My setup has 2 nodes in the solrcloud cluster, each node has 3 shards with no replication. From the error log it seems like all the shards on this box are throwing async exception errors. Other node in the cluster does not have any errors in

Re: How to ptotect middile initials during search

A is part of stopwords ...that is why it got dropped. Protected words will only stop it from stemming https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/language-analysis.html Thanks Jay Potharaju On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Wendy2 <wendy@rcsb.org> wrote: > Hi fellow Users, > &g

Re: solr 6.6.3 intermittent group faceting errors(Lucene54DocValuesProducer)

LR-7867>. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2018 8:44 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > >> The other possibility is that you have LuceneMatchVersion set to >> 5-something in solrconfig

Re: solr 6.6.3 intermittent group faceting errors(Lucene54DocValuesProducer)

(SimpleFacets.java:803) Thanks Jay Potharaju On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > Has anyone seen issues with group faceting on multivalued fields in solr > 6x? Can any of the committers comment? > Thanks > Jay > > On Ap

Re: solr 6.6.3 intermittent group faceting errors

Hi Has anyone seen issues with group faceting on multivalued fields in solr 6x? Can any of the committers comment? Thanks Jay > On Apr 16, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I deleted my collection and rebuilt it to check if there are any issues w

Re: solr 6.6.3 intermittent group faceting errors

but rather on small subset of data, which is fixed by reindexing. Any suggestions on what else to check for?? Thanks Jay Potharaju On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am testing solr 6.6.3 and have been running into interm

solr 6.6.3 intermittent group faceting errors

Hi, I am testing solr 6.6.3 and have been running into intermittent group faceting errors. I did some bulk indexing to initially setup the collection I have multiple facet fields it only throws error on one of the fields. The issue goes away when I reindex the data. I am upgrading from solr

this IndexWriter is closed

Hi, I am getting Indexwriter is closed error only on some of my shards in the collection. This seems to be happening on leader shards only. There is are other shards on the box and they are not throwing any error. Also there is enough disc space on the box available at this time. Solr: 5.3.0.

Re: Solr 6.6.3: Errors when using facet.field

This is my query: facet=true=true=true=product_id=true=category_id Field def: Tried adding both docvalues & without docvalues. Shards: 2 Has anyone else experienced this error? Thanks Thanks Jay Potharaju On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com

Re: Solr 6.6.3: Errors when using facet.field

It looks like it was fixed as part of 6.6.3 : SOLR-6160 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6160>. FYI: I have 2 shards in my test environment. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am runn

Solr 6.6.3: Errors when using facet.field

.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) 500 The above query worked in solr 5.3. Any suggestions ? Thanks Jay Potharaju

Re: Solr 6.6.3: Cant create shard name with hyphen

nvm i see the first comment on the ticket ...that hypens are allowed but not when it is the first character. It looks like 5.5 was the last version where it was supported. Thanks Jay Thanks Jay Potharaju On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:29 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: Solr 6.6.3: Cant create shard name with hyphen

Thanks for the reply Shawn. Was this a recent change ? As per the ticket it was fixed in 6.0. Is this change(no hyphens as starting of name ) applicable to all 6x versions. Thanks > On Mar 14, 2018, at 6:25 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > >> On 3/14/2018 6:20

Re: Solr 6.6.3: Cant create shard name with hyphen

I tested in solr 6.5.1 and there also it is broken. Any recommendation which version of 6 is that feature functioning. At this time the shard name cant be changed because of dependency with other applications. Thanks Thanks Jay Potharaju On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspot

Solr 6.6.3: Cant create shard name with hyphen

Hi , I am creating a new collection in solr 6.6.3 and it wont allow me create a shard with hyphen. This ticket( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8725) was closed earlier. But it is not working for me in 6.6.3. Upgrading from 5.3 to 6.6.3. Thanks Jay

Re: SynonymGraphFilterFactory with WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory usage

Thanks Jay Potharaju On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote: > Jay > Did you try using text_en_splitting copied out of another release? > Though if someone went to the trouble of removing it from the example, > there could be something broken in it

Re: SynonymGraphFilterFactory with WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory usage

I am upgrading to solr 6.6.3 and one of my fields uses text_en_splitting. Are there any recommendations on how to adjust the fieldtype definition for these fields. Thanks Thanks Jay Potharaju On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 5:09 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Webster, >

book on solr

for scaling would also be great. Thanks Jay Potharaju

Best practices for backup & restore

Hi, I was wondering if there are any best practices for doing solr backup & restore. In the past when running backup, I stopped indexing during the backup process. I am looking at this documentation and it says that indexing can continue when backup is in progress.

Re: solrcloud load balancing

<apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 10/22/2016 6:19 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote: > > I am trying to understand how load balancing works in solrcloud. > > > > As per my understanding solrcloud provides load balancing when querying > > using an http endpoint. When a que

Re: solrcloud load balancing

of the sub-request QTimes. > > Best, > Erick > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to understand how load balancing works in solrcloud. > > > > As per my understanding so

solrcloud load balancing

Hi, I am trying to understand how load balancing works in solrcloud. As per my understanding solrcloud provides load balancing when querying using an http endpoint. When a query is sent to any of the nodes , solr will intelligently decide which server can fulfill the request and will be

Re: json facet - date range & interval

start : "NOW/DAY%2D10DAYS", > end : "NOW/DAY", > gap : "%2B1DAY" > > } > } > > > On 06/28/2016 01:19 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote: > >> json.facet={daterange : {type : range, field : datefield, start : >> &q

Re: json facet - date range & interval

PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > First thing I'd do is escape the plus. It's probably being interpreted > as a space. > > Best, > Erick > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am tr

json facet - date range & interval

Hi, I am trying to use the json range facet with a tdate field. I tried the following but get an error. Any suggestions on how to fix the following error /examples for date range facets. json.facet={daterange : {type : range, field : datefield, start :"NOW-10DAYS", end : "NOW/DAY", gap : "+1DAY"

Re: Sorting & searching on the same field

ctory.html > > Regards, > Alex. > > Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: > http://www.solr-start.com/ > > >> On 24 June 2016 at 13:42, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Any ideas on how to handle case insensitive sea

Re: Sorting & searching on the same field

> > Regards, > Alex > On 24 Jun 2016 9:01 AM, "Jay Potharaju" <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > yes, that is what i thought. but was checking to see if there was > something > > I was missing. > > Thanks > > > > On Thu, Jun

clarification on using docvalues for sorting

Hi, I am trying to do a case insensitive sorting on couple of fields. For this I am doing the following Above would not allow using this datatype with docvalues. Docvalues can only be used with string & trie fields. And also docvalues are recommended for sorting &

Slow facet range performance

Hi, I am running facet query on a date field and the results are coming back on an avg 500ms. The field is set to use docvalues & field type is tdate. SOLR - 5.5

Re: Sorting & searching on the same field

d field. > Sorting requires a single value (token) to be meaningful. > > Ahmet > > > > On Thursday, June 23, 2016 7:43 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Hi, > I would like to have 1 field that can used for both searching and case > insensitiv

Sorting & searching on the same field

Hi, I would like to have 1 field that can used for both searching and case insensitive sorting. As far as i know the only way to do is to have two fields one for searching (text_en) and one for sorting(lowercase & string). Any ideas how the two can be combined into 1 field. -- Thanks

Re: result grouping in sharded index

ction. " On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Do you have to group, or can you collapse instead? > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collapse+and+Expand+Results > > Cheers > > Tom > > On Tue, Ju

Re: result grouping in sharded index

Any suggestions on how to handle result grouping in sharded index? On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am working on a functionality that would require me to group documents > by a id field. I read that the ngroups feature

result grouping in sharded index

Hi, I am working on a functionality that would require me to group documents by a id field. I read that the ngroups feature would not work in a sharded index. Can someone recommend how to handle this in a sharded index? Solr Version: 5.5

Re: Slow date filter query

Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > That does seem long, but you haven't provided many details > > about the fields. Are there 100 docs in your index? 100M docs? 500M docs? > > > > Are you using NOW in appropriately? See: > > > > On Fri, May 27, 201

Slow date filter query

Hi, I am running filter query(range query) on date fields(high cardinality) and the performance is really bad ...it takes about 2-5 seconds for it to come back with response. I am rebuilding the index to have docvalues & tdates instead of "date" field. But not sure if that will alleviate the

Re: debugging solr query

W/DAY+1] > =fieldA:abc > =dt1 asc,field2 asc, fieldC desc > > Play with the caches. > Also consider disabling caching, and/or supplying execution order for the > filer queries. > Please see : > https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/02/10/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/ > &g

Re: debugging solr query

suggestions on how handle filtering/querying/sorting on high cardinality date fields? Index size: 30Million Solr: 4.3.1 Thanks On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the feedback. The queries I run are very basic filter queries > wi

Re: debugging solr query

vide performance benefits. - Would there be a performance penalty because majority of the documents(!fieldA:abc) dont have values in the new columns? Thanks On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any links that illustrate and talk about solr

Re: debugging solr query

Any links that illustrate and talk about solr internals and how indexing/querying works would be a great help. Thanks Jay On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the feedback. The queries I run are very basic filter queries

Re: How to save index data to other place? [scottchu]

rver\slolr, e.g. /local/solr-5.4.1/server/solr/cugna. > Index data is also saved there. But wish to save index data on other > folder, say /var/sc_data/cugna. How can I dothis? > > scott.chu，scott@udngroup.com > 2016/5/26 (週四) > -- Thanks Jay Potharaju

Re: How to perform a contains query

rmation.\"", >> : > >> : > "summary": >> "java/org/apache/catalina/core/AsyncContextImpl.java in >> : > Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.40 does not properly handle the throwing >> of a >> : > RuntimeException in an AsyncListener in an application, which allows >> : > context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive request information >> intended >> : > for other applications in opportunistic circumstances via an >> application >> : > that records the requests that it processes.", >> : > >> : > "summary": "Session fixation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat >> 7.x >> : > before 7.0.66, 8.x before 8.0.30, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2, when >> different >> : > session settings are used for deployments of multiple versions of the >> same >> : > web application, might allow remote attackers to hijack web sessions >> by >> : > leveraging use of a requestedSessionSSL field for an unintended >> request, >> : > related to CoyoteAdapter.java and Request.java.", >> : > >> : > "summary": "The (1) Manager and (2) Host Manager applications >> in >> : > Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before >> 9.0.0.M2 >> : > establish sessions and send CSRF tokens for arbitrary new requests, >> which >> : > allows remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism by >> using a >> : > token.", >> : > >> : > "summary": "The setGlobalContext method in >> : > org/apache/naming/factory/ResourceLinkFactory.java in Apache Tomcat >> 7.x >> : > before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M3 does not >> consider >> : > whether ResourceLinkFactory.setGlobalContext callers are authorized, >> which >> : > allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager >> : > restrictions and read or write to arbitrary application data, or >> cause a >> : > denial of service (application disruption), via a web application >> that sets >> : > a crafted global context.", >> : >> : >> >> -Hoss >> http://www.lucidworks.com/ >> > > -- Thanks Jay Potharaju

Re: debugging solr query

> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Is it QueryComponent taking time? > > Ot other components? > > > > Also make sure there is plenty of RAM for OS cache. >

debugging solr query

Hi, I am trying to debug solr performance problems on an old version of solr, 4.3.1. The queries are taking really long -in the range of 2-5 seconds!!. Running filter query with only one condition also takes about a second. There is memory available on the box for solr to use. I have been looking

Re: Filter queries & caching

filter(B) > q=filter(A) > q=filter(B) > > would only require two. Yet all of them would be satisfied only by > looking at the filterCache. > > Aside from the example immediately above, which one you use is largely > a matter of taste. > > Best, > Erick > > On Mon

Error on creating new collection with existing configs

Hi, I created a new config and uploaded it to zk with the name test_conf. And then created a collection which uses this config. CREATE COLLECTION: /solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE=test2=1=2=test_conf When indexing the data using DIH I get an error.

Re: Filter queries & caching

m.invalid> wrote: > Hi, > > As I understand it useful incase you use an OR operator between two > restricting clauses. > Recall that multiple fq means implicit AND. > > ahmet > > > > On Monday, May 9, 2016 4:02 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> > w

Re: Filter queries & caching

he filter cache. Since scores are not cached, all documents that match the filter produce the same score (0 by default). Cached filters will be extremely fast when they are used again in another query. Thanks On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote

Re: understanding phonetic matching

help you > out. > > Thanks, > Susheel > > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for the feedback, I was getting correct results when searching for > > jon & john. But when I tried other names like 'khloe

Re: understanding phonetic matching

in the > > two boxes in the UI? I am not sure what "look at my solr data" means > > in this particular context. > > > > Regards, > >Alex. > > > > Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: > > http:/

Re: Filter queries & caching

> would have three simple filters running simultaneously. For low to > medium query loads on a server with a whole bunch of CPUs, where there > is plenty of spare CPU power, this can be a real gain in performance ... > but if the query load is really high, it might be a bad thing. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > -- Thanks Jay Potharaju

Re: Filter queries & caching

Thanks Shawn,Erick & Ahmet , this was very helpful. > On May 6, 2016, at 6:19 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > >> On 5/5/2016 2:44 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote: >> Are you suggesting rewriting it like this ? >> fq=filter(fromfield:[* TO NOW

Re: Filter queries & caching

AY-7DAY TO *] ) fq=filter(type:abc) Is this something that I would need to determine by running some test Thanks On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you suggesting rewriting it like this ? > fq=filter(fromfield:[* TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]&&a

Re: Filter queries & caching

uery so it will be cached independently. > > Also consider disabling caching (using cost) in expensive queries: > http://yonik.com/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/ > > Ahmet > > > > On Thursday, May 5, 2016 8:25 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Hi

Filter queries & caching

Hi, I have a filter query that gets documents based on date ranges from last n days to anytime in future. The objective is to get documents between a date range, but the start date and end date values are stored in different fields and that is why I wrote the filter query as below

Re: query action with wrong result size zero

> i found a strange thing with solr query，when i set the value of query > field like "brand:amd"，the size of query result is zero,but the real data > is not zero，can some body tell me why，thank you very much！！ > my english is not very good，wish some body understand my words! > -- Thanks Jay Potharaju

Using updateRequest Processor with DIH

Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to use Update Request Processor with DIH. I would like to update an index_time field whenever documents are added/updated in the collection. I know that I could easily pass a time stamp which would update the field in my collection but I was trying to do it

  1   2   >