of the SQL handler.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:09 AM, GW <thegeofo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear reader,
>
> I've found that using the distinct clause gives me the list I want.
>
> I also have a multivalued rpt_location in the col
. This doesn't require any specific sort but it is limited in size by
how much data can fit in the hash map.
You can parallelize both joins using the parallel function to improve
scalability and performance.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Zheng Lin
You can also checkout
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Tokenizers#Tokenizers-RegularExpressionPatternTokenizer
.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Susheel:
>
&g
There isn't a cat function yet. The closest function we have currently is a
merge function:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Streaming+Expressions#StreamingExpressions-merge
But I've been meaning to add a cat function so feel free to create the jira.
Joel Bernstein
http
findings in the ticket.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Joe Obernberger <
joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Tim. I appreciated the tips. At this point, I'm just trying to
> understand how to use it. The 30 tweets that I've sel
the same seems odd though. The idfs_ds in
particular were designed to be accurate when there are multiple training
sets in the same collection.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Joe Obernberger <
joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
You'll probably get better results by trying to get more performance out of
your single threaded postfilter. If you can post the code in you collect()
method you may get some ideas on how to improve the performance.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:13 PM
There isn't a jira issue for this yet. FOr Solr 6.6 there are few important
features lined up:
1) SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT)
2) Date/Time function support
3) Arithmetic function support
4) SELECT ... INTO ...
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Damien
.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Pratik Patel <pra...@semandex.net> wrote:
> Wow, this is interesting! Is it going to be a new addition to solr or is it
> already available cause I can not find it in documentation? I am using solr
>
count(*)),
gt(count(*),1))),
fl="concept_name",
on="ancestors=conceptid")
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Pratik Patel <pra...@semandex.net> wrote:
> H
Yeah, there has been a lot of changes to configs in Solr 6. All the
streaming request handlers have now been made implicit so the
solrconfig.xml doesn't include them. Something seems to be stepping on the
implicit configs.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12
Yeah, something is wrong with the configuration, because /export only
should be returning json. Have you changed the configurations?
What were the exact steps you used in setting up the server?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
explain a little more about the use case?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Pratik Patel <pra...@semandex.net> wrote:
> I have two types of documents in my index. eventLink and concepttData.
>
> eventLink { ancestors:[,] }
> concep
Ok. I updated the other thread with a URL to run based on what I've seeing
in the logs. Try running that URL and let's see what comes back.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
try running the following query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/email/export?{!terms+f%3Dfrom}ed...@mail.com
=false=from,to=to+asc,from+asc=json=2.2
Let's see what comes back from this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwi
Looks like there might be something strange with your configuration. Did
you upgrade an existing install or is this a standard Solr 6.4.1 install?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
&g
You're getting json parse errors, that look like your getting an XML
response. Do you see any errors in the logs other then the stack trace. I
suspect there might be another error above the stack trace which shows the
error from the server that causing it to respond with XML.
Joel Bernstein
Are you sorting on a single field, or multiple fields?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:49 PM, alexpusch <a...@getjaco.com> wrote:
> As have been said, only the top N results are collected, but in order to
> find
> out which of the results
the query on the storeid.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Pratik Patel <pra...@semandex.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to write a streaming expression with 'having' function in it.
> Following is my simple query.
>
>
Syntax looks ok. The logs should have a stack trace.
One thing it could be is that gatherNodes will only work on single value
fields currently.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
&g
The /export handler does exactly what you described, but it stream
documents rather trying to sort everything in memory at once. In Solr 4.11
the class is called SortingResponseWriter. You can take a look at the
approach used.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017
ou have other questions about how to structure the data or
run the queries.
Adding multi-value field support is a fairly high priority so I would
expect this to be coming in a future release.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Pratik Patel <
. The Having clause is implemented in the SQL handler
though, not in the json facet API.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:55 PM, lazarusjohn <lazarusj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to get average of amount between two values(min and max
ill release as part of the first release of the significantTerms
expression in Solr 6.5.
Solr 6.6 will likely have support for all stream source and parallel
SQL/JDBC.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:19 PM, OTH <omer.t@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
Yes, I think Apache OpenNLP should be fine.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Avtar Singh Mehra <asmehr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Well i have created some filters using Apache OpenNLP. Will it work?
>
> On 6 March 2017 at 00:30, Joel B
The significantTerms streaming expression could be useful as a
co-occurrence based suggester. This coming in Solr 6.5 but could be easily
backported to earlier releases. This blog describes how it works:
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2017/02/anomaly-detection-in-solr-65.html
Joel Bernstein
http
I believe StanfordCore is licensed under the GPL which means it will be
incompatible with the Apache License. Would it be possible to port to a
different NLP library?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
lists are also stored along with documents and passed to Solr to support
document level access control during the search.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Tim Casey <tca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would possibly extend this a b
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8092.
Fixing this problem would likely resolve your scenario as well.
I haven't broken ground on it yet though.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:52 PM, ronbraun <ronbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
&g
eeper ties into the
Solr schema.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi <yasufumi0...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a newbie and trying SQL interfaces on Solr 6.4.1.
>
> Firstly, I tried to get the values of all fields, b
on the
first and second pass and is not cached, the so query/collapse need to be
run twice for facets.
The fix for this would be to start caching the DocSets needed for faceting.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Ronald K. Braun <ronbr...@gmail.com>
Also you can see in the final iteration of the model that there are 8 true
positives and 8 false positives. So this model classifies everything as
positive. At that you know that it's not a good model.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Joel Bernstein
it selects. Then you need multiple examples for each feature.
I was testing with the enron ham/spam data set. It would be good to
download that dataset and see what that looks like.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.
Can you post the final iteration of the model?
Also the expression you used to train the model?
How much training data do you have? Ho many positive examples and negatives
examples?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Susheel Kumar <sushe
ill include the "groupId"
in the ancestor field of each doc id.
You'll find that when master the graph expression syntax you'll be able to
do all kinds of interesting graph queries on the data set you've described,
which is really a best treated as a graph.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blo
Take a look at the graph expressions:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Graph+Traversal
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> What about collapse and expand with overriden query.
simple aggregations over buckets, but not
the kind of automatic date range faceting you're currently using.
Aggregations are going to be getting more attention in Streaming
Expressions soon, to support additional functionality Parallel SQL.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu
Also this presentation discusses the RankQuery (Starting on slide 16)
http://www.slideshare.net/lucidworks/managed-search-presented-by-jacob-graves-getty-images
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/ReRankQParserPlugin.java
And the base class this extends:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/AbstractReRankQuery.java
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Feb 1
/JDBCStream.java
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Probably not, but writing your own little Java process to do it would be
> trivial with Kafka 0.9.X or 0.10.X. You can also look at the Confluen
,
but the overhead was so low that it seemed acceptable.
This is quite different then what you describe and also quite different
then the stats caching approach which is currently in Solr.
Maybe I'm just bias to my own approach, but it seems simple and fast.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
about this issue and update this thread with the issue number.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying out the Streaming Expressions in Solr 6.3.0.
>
> Currently,
Reading your blogs now.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok my mistake, I was thinking you were writing your own component and
> needed a fast way to get global IDF. You're looking for fas
the query and fetch the IDF, then pass it along to the shards?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>
wrote:
> Specifically, I’m talking about this:
>
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
&g
Ah, I thought you were just interested in a fast way to get at IDF. This
approach does take a callback but it's really fast.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>
wrote:
> I know how to do it. You
.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>
wrote:
> I tried running with the LRUStatsCache for global IDF, but the performance
> penalty was pretty big. The 95th percentile response time went from 3.4
> second
I'd have to put some thought into this. The problem with timeAllowed is
that it won't return all the results. So if you're using timeAllowed and
performing a join or aggregation it will just give incorrect answers. I'm
not we want to have that.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat
When you work with relational algebra operations you'll need to specify the
/export handler in the search expressions so that all of the tuples are
operated on by the join.
search(ParentDocuments, q=DocId:1042, fl="Id,DocId,SubDocId", sort="Id asc",
q="/expor
I'm pretty sure that time allowed and the /export handler are not currently
compatible.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:57 PM, radha krishnan <dradhakrishna...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> am trying to query a core with 60 million doc
Also take a look at:
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2016/10/solr-63-batch-jobs-parallel-etl-and.html
It describes a very flexible approach to do batch re-indexing jobs.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Yago Riveiro <yago.rive...@gmail.com>
The time functions aren't supported in the SQL interface currently.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:44 AM, radha krishnan <dradhakrishna...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can we write an SQL statement and use the /sql handler to get the
>
The http parameter is 'expr', you're using stream.body.
The docs contain the basic syntax:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Streaming+Expressions
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>
Currently these are not settable.It's easy enough to add a setter for this
values. What types of behaviors have you run into when CloudSolrClient is
having timeouts issues?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Yago Riveiro <yago.rive...@gmail.com>
We have this fixed in Solr 6.4 coming out next week. Here is the jira:
SOLR-9495.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Yago Riveiro <yago.rive...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The CloudSolrStream client (Solr 6.3.0) assumes that the sort para
IS NULL and IS NOT NULL predicate are not currently supported.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:05 PM, radha krishnan <dradhakrishna...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> solr version : 6.3
>
> will WHERE <> IS NULL / IS NOT NULL
This issue is resolved for Solr 6.4:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9919
I also created an issue to resolve future bugs of this nature:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9924
Thanks for the bug report!
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9
Luckily https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9103 is available in
Solr 6.3
So you can register the random expression through the solrconfig. The
ticket shows an example.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com>
sure I remember testing random at scale through the /stream
handler so I'm not sure how this missed getting committed.
I will fix this for Solr 6.4.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Joe Obernberger <
joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'
There are test cases with multiple order by fields for SELECT DISTINCT and
GROUP BY. But not for simple SELECT.
We are just about to release a new version of the SQL interface which uses
Apache Calcite rather then Presto. I'll make sure that this is working in
the new release.
Joel Bernstein
This would be a bug. I'll take a look at the test cases and see if there is
a test case for this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:17 PM, radha krishnan <dradhakrishna...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when i was trying out the SQL functional
/solrj/io/comp/FieldComparator.java
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Chetas Joshi <chetas.jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> I don't have any solr documents that have NULL values for the sort fields I
> use in my queries.
>
>
Ok, based on the stack trace I suspect one of your sort fields has NULL
values, which in the 5x branch could produce null pointers if a segment had
no values for a sort field. This is also fixed in the Solr 6x branch.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:44 PM
The Streaming API may have been throwing exceptions because the JSON
special characters were not escaped. This was fixed in Solr 6.0.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Chetas Joshi <chetas.jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I
of stress tests and I've never been able to make it happen.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I plan on using this thread to address questions that were posted to
&g
are stream expressions robust enough to be used in
production?
5) Is there any more deep dive documentation about topic(). I would love to
know its stats for query volume as big as ours (9-10 million). Or, I would
love to know how its working internally.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
like exceptions being thrown when searchers are opened too frequently.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Trey Grainger <solrt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shawn and Joel both answered the question with seemingly opposite answers,
> but Joel's sho
: is an on-deck searcher a warming searcher: the
answer is basically yes.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 12/8/2016 6:08 PM, Brent wrote:
> > Is there a difference between an &qu
ses.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Joe Obernberger <
joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just some data points.
> main is an alias for the collection UNCLASS.
>
> 'stmt=SELECT TextSize from main LIMIT 10' fails
> 's
I'll take a look at the StatsStream and see what the issue is.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Damien Kamerman <dami...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aggregated selects only work with lower-case collection names (and no
> dashes). (Bug in StatsSt
Hi,
It looks like the outcome field my not be correct or it may have missing
values. You'll need to populate this field for all records in the training
set.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Joe Obernberger <
joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote:
more useful algorithms.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] <
daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
> Does Lucene/Solr include any tools for measuring the entropy/information
> of a field? My intuition is that this wou
Solr 5 was very early days for Streaming Expressions. Streaming Expressions
and SQL use Java 8 so development switched to the 6.0 branch five months
before the 6.0 release. So there was a very large jump in features and bug
fixes from Solr 5 to Solr 6 in Streaming Expressions.
Joel Bernstein
http
In Solr 5 the /export handler wasn't escaping json text fields, which would
produce json parse exceptions. This was fixed in Solr 6.0.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hmm, that should work
Thanks for digging into this, let's create a jira ticket for this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:23 PM, sandeep mukherjee <
wiredcit...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> I have more progress since my last mail. I figured out that in the
> StreamCo
.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ray Niu <newry1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello:
>Any follow up?
>
> 2016-11-03 11:18 GMT-07:00 Ray Niu <newry1...@gmail.com>:
>
> > the soft commit is 15 seconds and hard commit is
This might be useful. In this scenario you load you content into Solr for
staging and perform your ETL from Solr to Solr:
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2016/10/solr-63-batch-jobs-parallel-etl-and.html
Basically Solr becomes a text processing warehouse.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
Are you doing heavy writes at the time?
How many concurrent reads are are happening?
What version of Solr are you using?
What is the field definition for the double, is it docValues?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Ray Niu <newry1...@gmail.
what relationships they wanted to traverse.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
wrote:
> The other way to think about is: I want to put labels on the edges. In my
> case, the label is the relations
author"], "level":1},
{"node":"Maria","collection":"reviews","field":"user_s","
ancestors":["book2"], "relationships":["author"], "level":1},
{"EOF":true,"RE
ssions.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Chetas Joshi <chetas.jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using /export handler to stream data using CloudSolrStream.
>
> I am using fl=uuid,space,timestamp where uuid and space are Stri
the group head. Recently the sort parameter was added to
collapse, but this likely is not nearly as fast as using the min/max for
selecting group heads.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Originally c
, is to do
it in a way that does not hurt the original performance goal of collapse.
Otherwise we'll be back to just have slow grouping.
Perhaps the new API's that are being worked could have a facade over
grouping and collapsing so they would share the same API.
Joel Bernstein
http
systems.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Joel -- thanks! Got this working and now feel in a better shape to grok
> what's happening
>
> Out of curiosity, is th
Currently the joins in the Streaming API don't support joining on
multi-value fields. It will be difficult to support merge joins on
multi-value fields but hash joins would be possible in the future. Also the
gatherNodes graph expression will support multi-value fields in the future.
Joel
interface is so
important. Currently it doesn't support joins, but when it does, it will
build the proper streaming expression to do the relational algebra.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Gurdeep Singh <gurdeep
Ok, I'll test this out.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Markko Legonkov <maxl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> here is the stacktrace
>
> java.io.IOException: Unable to construct instance of
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.strea
Also you'll probably need to specify the /export handler in the search
expressions, so you get the entire result set.
qt="/export"
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I
Ok, I took a closer look at the expression. I believe this is not supported:
sale_price_d!=c_sale_price_d
Possibly the complement expression might accomplish what you're trying to
do.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Joel Bernstein <jo
Hi can you attach the stack traces in the logs? I'd like to see where this
exception coming, this appears to be a bug.
I'll also need to dig into your expression and see if there is an issue
with the syntax.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Markko
will need to experiment with your document set and performance
requirements to find your optimal shard size.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 9/23/2016 2:33 PM, Jeffery Yuan wrote:
> > In
et open to have scoreNodes operate directly on the facet()
function so you don't have to deal with
the select() function. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9537. I'd
like to get to this soon.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Doug Turnbul
This is great, I'll try to make it up to Boston a day earlier for this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Charlie Hull <char...@flax.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you're coming to Lucene Revolution next month in Boston, we're run
Alessandro, I'll be doing some testing with the re-ranker as part of
SOLR-9403 for Solr 6.3. I'll see if I can better understand the issue
you're bringing up during the testing. I'll report back to this thread
after I've done some testing.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep
would make a good jira issue.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Read this article and thought it could be interesting as a way to do
> ingestion:
>
> https://dzone.com/article
-with-Streaming-Expressions-LeftOuterJoin-td4290526.html
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Aswath Srinivasan (TMS) <
aswath.sriniva...@toyota.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm exploring the Parallel SQL. I don't see any SQL JOIN featu
I'm currently working on upgrading Alfresco from Solr 6.0 to Solr 6.2.
Should be easy. Think again. Lucene analyzer changes between Solr 6.0 and
Solr 6.2 and a new assert in ConjunctionDISI have caused days of work to
perform this simple upgrade.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
I'm not understanding where the inconsistency comes into play.
The re-ranking occurs on the shards. The aggregator node will be sent some
docs that have been re-scored and others that are not. But the sorting
should be the same as someone pages through the result set.
Joel Bernstein
http
Parallel SQL only supports the following functions currently: (SUM, AVG,
MIN, MAX, COUNT).
More functions and compound functions are on the roadmap.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Praveen Babu <subramani@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
technique.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Praveen Babu <subramani@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi ,
>
>
> Does parallel sql support Multi valued field?
>
> I am unable to group by on Multi valued field when I choose
>
> /sql?aggre
Getting aliases working is a high priority and fairly easy to do. We should
have this in for Solr 6.3.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Tali Finelt <tal...@il.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We saw there is an open issue regarding this s
301 - 400 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
