On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Peter Karich peat...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi,
Please add preserveOriginal=1 to your WDF [1] definition and reindex
(or
just try with the analysis page).
but it is already there!?
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eric Martin e...@makethembite.com wrote:
Hi,
I searched google and the wiki to find out how I can force a full re-index
of all of my content and I came up with zilch. My goal is to be able to
adjust the weight settings, re-index my entire database and then
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Eric Martin e...@makethembite.com wrote:
Ah, I am using an ApacheSolr module in Drupal and used nutch to insert the
data into the Solr index. When I using Jetty I could just delete the data
contents in sshd and then restart the service forcing the reindex.
2010/11/17 Jón Helgi Jónsson jonjons...@gmail.com:
I'm using index time boosting and need to specify every field I want
to search (not use copy fields) or else the boosting wont work.
This query with 1 saerchterm works fine, boosts look good:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Peter Blokland pe...@desk.nl wrote:
hi.
i'm using solr and am trying to limit my resultset to documents
that either have a publication date in the range * to now, or
have no publication date set at all (field is not present).
however, using this :
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Peter Blokland pe...@desk.nl wrote:
hi,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:54:48AM -0500, Ken Stanley wrote:
pubdate:([* TO NOW] OR (NOT *))
Instead of using NOT, try simply prefixing the field name with a minus
sign. This tells SOLR to exclude the field
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
For (1) you probably need to write a custom transformer. Something like:
public Object transformRow(MapString, Object row) {
String language_code = row.get(language_code);
String text = row.get(text);
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Ken Stanley doh...@gmail.com wrote:
CREATE TABLE documents (
id INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
language_code CHAR(2),
tags CHAR(30),
text TEXT,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
);
I apologize, but I couldn't leave the typo in my last post
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Tri Nguyen tringuye...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Can I configure solr to schedule imports at a specified time (say once a day,
once an hour, etc)?
Also, does solr have some sort of heartbeat mechanism?
Thanks,
Tri
Tri,
If you use the DataImportHandler (DIH),
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:11 PM, robo - robom...@gmail.com wrote:
How do people email this list without getting spam filter problems?
Depends on which side of the spam filter that you're referring to.
I've found that to keep these emails from entering my spam filter is
to add a rule to Gmail
the various tag keywords for each blog entry;
this is where multiValued comes in handy.
I hope that this helps to clarify things for you.
- Ken Stanley
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Christopher Gross cogr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ken.
I'm using a script with Java/SolrJ to copy documents from their original
locations into the Solr Index.
I wasn't sure if the copyField would help me, but from your answers it seems
that I'll have to
/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory
- Ken Stanley
definition and reindexing to see if that gives you what you're looking
for?
- Ken Stanley
PS. If this came through twice, I apologize; I got a bounce-back
saying my original reply was blocked, so I'm trying to re-send as
plain text.
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Em mailformailingli...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi List,
I got an issue with my Solr-environment in Tomcat.
First: I am not very familiar with Tomcat, so it might be my fault and not
Solr's.
It can not be a solr-side configuration problem, since everything worked
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Em mailformailingli...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Ken,
thank you for your quick answer!
To make sure that there occurs no mistakes at my application's side, I send
my requests with the form that is available at solr/admin/form.jsp
I changed almost nothing from the
with SOLR has a dismax parser that you can modify
to your needs.
- Ken Stanley
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
That's not the response I get when I try your query, so I suspect
something's not quite right with your test...
But you could also try putting parentheses around the words, like
]]/str
/lst
/formatter
/highlighting
It is worth noting that I have not done anything (except formatting) to the
highlighting configuration in solrconfig.xml. Any help, assistance, and/or
guidance that can be provided would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Ken Stanley
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(10/11/02 23:14), Ken Stanley wrote:
I've noticed in the stack trace that this exception occurs when trying to
build the query for the highlighting; I've confirmed this by copying the
params and changing hl=true to hl
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Tod listac...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a number of fields I need to do an exact match on. I've defined
them as 'string' in my schema.xml. I've noticed that I get back query
results that don't have all of the words I'm using to search with.
For example:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:12 PM, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have a city named 's-Hertogenbosch
I want it to be indexed exactly like that, so 's-Hertogenbosch (without
)
But now I get:
lst name=city
int name=hertogenbosch1/int
int name=s1/int
int
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Ron Mayer r...@0ape.com wrote:
If I want to move a core from one physical machine to another,
is it as simple as just
scp -r core5 otherserver:/path/on/other/server/
and then adding
core name=core5name instanceDir=core5 /
on that other server's solr.xml
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Ephraim Ofir ephra...@icq.com wrote:
How is this better than replication?
Ephraim Ofir
It's not; for our needs here, we have not set up replication through SOLR.
We are working through OOM problems/performance tuning first, then best
practices second. I just
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
I don't think we should do this until it becomes a real problem.
The number of job offers is tiny compared to dev emails, so far, as
far as I can tell.
Mike
By the time that it becomes a real problem, it
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
If I get your question right, you probably want to use the AND binary
operator as in samsung AND andriod AND GPS or +samsung +andriod +GPS
N.b. For these queries you can also pass the q.op
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Alex Matviychuk alex...@gmail.com wrote:
Getting this when deploying to tomcat:
[INFO][http-4443-exec-3][solr.schema.IndexSchema] readSchema():394
Reading Solr Schema
[INFO][http-4443-exec-3][solr.schema.IndexSchema] readSchema():408
Schema name=tsadmin
/field1
field2more data/field2
...
/CHILD_NODE
/XMLROOT
Also note that, in my experience, case sensitivity matters when parsing your
xpath instructions.
I hope this helps!
- Ken Stanley
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, pghorp...@ucla.edu wrote:
dataConfig
dataSource name=myfilereader type=FileDataSource/
document
entity name=f rootEntity=false dataSource=null
processor=FileListEntityProcessor fileName=.*xml recursive=true
baseDir=C:\data\sample_records\mods\starr
Parinita,
In its simplest form, what does your entity definition for DIH look like;
also, what does one record from your xml look like? We need more information
before we can really be of any help. :)
- Ken
It looked like something resembling white marble, which was
probably what it was:
Andrea,
Using the SOLR dismax query handler, you could set up queries like this to
boost on fields of your choice. Basically, the q parameter would be the
query terms (without the field definitions, and a qf (Query Fields)
parameter that you use to define your boost(s):
isn't
it?
Regards
Andrea
--
*From:* Ken Stanley [mailto:doh...@gmail.com]
*To:* solr-user@lucene.apache.org
*Sent:* Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:05:31 +0200
*Subject:* **SPAM** Re: boosting injection
Andrea,
Using the SOLR dismax query handler, you could set up queries
Ron,
In the past I've worked with SOLR for a product that required the ability to
search - separately - for companies, people, business lists, and a
combination of the previous three. In designing this in SOLR, I found that
using a combination of explicit field definitions and dynamic fields (
, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Ken Stanley doh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am using SOLR-1.4.1 with the DataImportHandler, and I am trying to follow
the advice from
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg11887.htmlabout
converting date fields to SortableLong fields
in the exception I've
described (displaying the date in the incorrect format).
Thanks,
Ken Stanley
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:42 AM, swapnil dubey swapnil.du...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am using the full import option with the data-config file as mentioned
below
dataConfig
dataSource type=JdbcDataSource driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
url=jdbc:mysql:///xxx user=xxx password=xx /
Hello all,
I am using SOLR-1.4.1 with the DataImportHandler, and I am trying to follow
the advice from
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg11887.html about
converting date fields to SortableLong fields for better memory efficiency.
However, whenever I try to do this using
in both (determined by the resourceId, which
exists on both)?
Cheers,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ken Stanley [mailto:doh...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 October 2010 20:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching Across Multiple Cores
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Lohrenz
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Lohrenz, Steven
steven.lohr...@hmhpub.comwrote:
Hi,
I am trying to figure out if how I can accomplish the following:
I have a fairly static and large set of resources I need to have indexed
and searchable. Solr seems to be a perfect fit for that. In addition
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
If you are using the DataImportHandler, you will not be able to search new
data until the full-import or delta-import is complete and the update is
committed. When I do a full reindex, it takes about 5 hours, and until it
($solrquery-getFields() as $field) {
// Do something
}
}
?
This is a minor request, I know. But, I feel that it would go a long way
toward polishing the extension up for general consumption.
Thank you,
Ken Stanley
PS. I apologize if this request has come through the pipes already
41 matches
Mail list logo
